Male 💪, 6'1''🧍♂️, 6.5'' 😉, Not single 🚫.
your moms house
Joined January 2024
- Tweets9.9K
- Following7
- Followers129
- Likes5.8K
When your IQ is just high enough to see that there is an issue, but not high enough to understand the simple reason as to why it is an issue.
Me getting serious about getting women to do their share of the below items:
Overall employed workers: Men ~53% (≈52.9% men / 47.1% women)
Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations: Men ~94%
Construction and extraction occupations: Men ~96%
Installation, maintenance, and repair occupations: Men ~96%
Production, transportation, and material moving occupations: Men ~75%
Construction industry: Men ~87–89%
Manufacturing industry: Men typically 70–80%
Many specific trades (carpenters, construction laborers, roofers, welders, machinists, heavy truck drivers, mining roles, etc.): Men 90–99%
Workplace fatalities: Men ~92%
Women still do 2.5 times more unpaid care work than men.
We're serious about changing that. Are you? 👀
#ShareTheCare
Remember, watch what they respond to, not what they say they like.
I don’t know if men will get this, but many women can find a man absolutely gorgeous yet feel ZERO attraction to him.
I think Henry Cavill is the perfect-looking man, but I’d never be with someone who looks like that, even if given the chance… even if he was tatted up 😩😭🫣
Some beauty you just admire, without feeling any desire.
"And men almost NEVER date someone less attractive than themselves" 🤣
She believes this because women rate 80% of men as below average which is not how averages work. Modern women are so retarded.
Something about female attraction that a lot of men don’t understand is that we don’t find it immutable
For women, his physical attractiveness ties directly to her impression of him
This is why women will often date & marry men similar in attractiveness if not a bit “lower”
And men almost NEVER date someone less attractive than themselves
Because for women, if there’s a baseline attraction AND he is funny, kind, admirable, and a little bit sexually aggressive, he will become physically hotter to her (this is why women tend to be pretty forgiving of the “dad bod”)
So likely what happened was he literally became unattractive to her in the pods because their exchange was so painfully awkward
When women describe “the ick” they are vocalizing that something in his behavior in that moment made him PHYSICALLY less attractive to her — and if the attraction is only base line, it is much harder for him to come back from
If he was suave in that exchange, she likely wouldn’t have reacted that way
(Plausibly why she agreed to give him another chance when he came across much more confident and “cool” in the reunion they had)
Women tend to prefer long-term partners (husbands/cucks) who command substantial resources and social capital yet remain relatively pliable, while favoring short-term sexual partners (Chads) who display the interpersonal dominance needed to shape the interaction itself.
Women, like all of us, are first and last creatures of the eye. The few men whose faces and frames kindle an immediate, involuntary spark are granted the only currency that matters: attention. Everyone else—the thoughtful, the sharp, the quietly extraordinary—never enters the frame at all. They are not rejected; they are unperceived. And what is never perceived cannot exist.
In that sense the tragedy is not cruelty, but prior selection. Most interesting men do not lose the competition. They are never allowed to compete.
When men are the main consumers of something (porn), it is labeled a male problem. When women are the main participants in something (hookup culture, in which many women sleep with a small subset of men), it is still labeled a male problem. The standard for assigning responsibility appears to shift depending on which gender is being discussed.
Women love to pretend that relationships are not transactional.
People stay in relationships because the benefits (companionship, sex, status, emotional regulation, practical support, money, social proof, identity) outweigh the costs. When that balance shifts, most leave (women) or check out (men). This is true of friendships, marriages, family, and romantic partnerships.
Evolutionary psychology, attachment research, and everyday divorce/breakup data all point the same way: sustained investment tracks perceived value and expected return. “Unconditional” love is is a fairytale reserved for young children and rare, extreme cases. The rest is conditional.
UnHinged retweeted
Low IQ gaslighting by Allie and other Christian women.
Ryan correctly points out the obvious disconnect here. In public, Christian women talk about how a man's character/values/love of God trump all, that those are truly the qualities they're looking for.
BUT...in private these women crave looks/status and select men on the same qualities used by secular women. Religious values go out the door because it can't overcome human biology & female hypergamy. Allie & others refuse to admit that Christian women are no different.
"You don't know what it's like to be a woman!"
Have you considered that you don't know what it's like to be a man?
If a fetus is just a "clump of cells", then how are women deciding to have abortions when it's a boy?
UnHinged retweeted
If feminists want to argue that aborting baby boys for simply being boys is ok then they have admitted to the following things being true
- gender is defined at birth
- women have become the oppressive class, since killing someone solely because of sex in definitionally oppressive.
- you are dumb beyond words for wanting to kill men but still somehow can’t help but have sex with them.