Dellena

If you genuinely want better treatment and more opportunities for someone, why does your advocacy always seem to require mentioning who else is getting them? Repeatedly pointing out that someone else has a solo schedule, while another “has nothing” isn’t holding the company accountable, it deliberately creates a narrative of one person being favoured while the other is being deprived. And after a while, it becomes very obvious who you’re trying to make people resent. You can advocate for a member without consciously or unconsciously making another the villain. Direct your demands to the company only, and leave others out of it. Acknowledge that his opportunities are the result of his hard work, and stop turning his success into evidence of another’s mistreatment. If your argument genuinely holds up, you shouldn’t need to make someone else’s success part of the problem.