Decoding Things (@DecodingThing) header
Decoding Things (@DecodingThing) profile picture

Human behavior. Technology. Intelligence. Civilization. Nothing is random once you see the pattern.

Joined August 2025
Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)Photo by Decoding Things (@DecodingThing)
The biggest missing piece in promises of an AI paradise is how the wealth reaches everyone else. Suppose machines can produce far more with far less human labour. Who owns them? How do people who lose their wages gain a claim on that production? Cheaper goods would help. But cheaper goods and a dependable income are different promises. If the answer is that wealthy owners will voluntarily provide for everyone, we need considerably more than their enthusiasm about the future. Show us the ownership arrangements, the funding and the rights people would actually have. Can the payments be withdrawn? Who decides? What happens when the company changes hands? A future where everyone can afford to live needs a distribution mechanism. The robots alone don’t provide one.
1
108
Replying to @brockpierson
That’s the way aha aha I like it!
8
Replying to @XCosmosOfficial
HAHAHAHA! 🤣 I can hear the gears grinding! Come on, come on… almost there… Wait! Don’t tell me! The answer is about to arrive from eternity past! 😂
6
Decoding Things retweeted
Who else remembers using this?
There’s an entire generation of people who have never experienced the emotional roller coaster of burning a CD and having it fail at 98.7%
10
2
43
1,760
Replying to @brockpierson
I had a DVD writer that missed at 99.99% all the time. I replaced it after burning 50 unreadable DVDs!
3
Replying to @UAPWixy
Wait… was Elon Musk one of the aliens who came back? That would explain his obsession with returning to Mars. Wrong planet, Elon! 😂👽
2
528
Replying to @ARIKAHENRY
My eyes just went cross-eyed trying to figure out what that even means. 😂 Can we go back to being bored without needing a PhD in philosophy?
5
Replying to @PierceLilholt
Absolutely. We did an entire series on colonizing Mars. Radiation, toxic dust, low gravity, life support, psychological isolation, astronomical costs… We’re romanticizing life on a planet where stepping outside without a spacesuit means dying. Somehow, we’re calling that humanity’s future.
1
18
Replying to @PierceLilholt
Mechanomorphism? Great. Now machines can misunderstand humans just as badly as humans misunderstand machines. 😂
1
3
28
Wait a minute. A roaring creature in the woods, government agents in white trucks, radar and laptops? In 1991?! Larry, you can’t just drop an X-Files episode on us and walk away! 😂 What happened next?
1
10
I want those contact lenses! All that technology right in your eyes, and your ass hanging out because nobody invented underwear! 😂👽
3
We come in peace. Wonderful! But first, put some fucking pants on! 🤣🤣🤣
3
106
Replying to @175050e @maniaUFO
What about oil change then?!? 😅
1
1
82
Replying to @Unexplained2020
What kind of logic is that? We have exactly ZERO publicly verified evidence that extraterrestrials have ever visited Earth. Not one confirmed case. Yet we’re supposed to believe that civilizations capable of crossing thousands of light-years have been coming here for centuries, perhaps millennia, just to watch us from the shadows? Why? What’s the point? Why travel across the galaxy only to hide indefinitely? You can invent a thousand hypothetical explanations, but none of them is evidence. At some point, speculation needs to meet reality.
27
C’mon, man! NASA spacesuits have around 14 layers to protect astronauts from the vacuum of space, extreme temperatures, and radiation. And you’re telling me these little Greys are exploring the universe wearing skin-tight pajamas? What are they, Goa’uld from Stargate SG-1? Next thing you’ll tell me there’s a symbiote inside and their eyes glow when they’re pissed off. JAFFA, KREE!
2
3
97
Interesting theory! Huge eyes could suggest adaptation to low-light environments. But then where did they evolve? Underground? On a planet orbiting a dim star? Or did future humans spend so much time staring at screens that evolution finally surrendered? And more importantly, why did evolution eliminate their underwear? 😂
1
4
31
Replying to @Unexplained2020
Always the same argument: they’re millions of years ahead of us, so we couldn’t possibly understand their intentions. Fine. But what’s the point of visiting and monitoring humanity for thousands of years without ever making contact? If we’re a potential future threat, keeping us technologically inferior might actually be in their interest. And imagine what would happen if a civilization with vastly superior knowledge and technology openly revealed itself to ancient humanity. We might have worshipped them as gods. So yes, there are plenty of hypothetical reasons to remain hidden. But none of them proves they’re actually here.
1
57
Replying to @OMApproach
I’m almost done building my bunker too! It’s only 10 square feet, compared to Zuckerberg’s 5,000, but who cares? I’ve got enough room for a chair, a flashlight, and approximately half a sandwich. And unlike those billionaires, I don’t have to worry about my security guards overthrowing me. There’s no room for a coup. If the apocalypse lasts more than 20 minutes, though, I’m screwed.
6
232
Replying to @maniaUFO
Forget the alien mothership. That’s Pinocchio floating through space! And judging by the length of his nose, someone at NASA has been telling an awful lot of lies. Disney’s lawyers are going to have a field day with this one. 😂
102
Replying to @Juyuwm
Wait, aren’t the names of Operation Paperclip scientists already documented in declassified US government records? The National Archives has extensive personnel files and historical records. And unless I’m missing something, the picture itself already identifies 105 individuals! The real question is whether this particular photograph has been correctly attributed to Operation Paperclip.
1
2
18
Replying to @XCosmosOfficial
Interesting question with no easy answer Yes / No / Maybe / Sure Is probably the best answer
1