Anmol Singh

One of the hardest truths about trading: You can have a great strategy and still be a terrible trader. And the scary part? Most traders don’t even realize when they’re sabotaging themselves. That’s why so few ever become consistent.

Stop asking traders how much money they made. Start asking how much they risked to make it. Making $10,000 while risking $50,000 isn't impressive. Risk-adjusted performance tells the real story.

Unpopular opinion: I think the crypto thesis is breaking down. And the market has already moved on. I know that's a tough pill to swallow. Especially for people who've spent years believing in Bitcoin and crypto. I could be completely wrong. This is just my opinion, take it for whatever it's worth. But I've been discussing this in my trading communities for over a year now, long before the recent price action. And my argument comes down to one thing: Capital has found a better place to go. For years, crypto was THE big technological revolution. The future of finance. The next great investment opportunity. Then AI happened. Suddenly, investors had an entirely new technological revolution to allocate capital toward. One with potentially trillions of dollars in economic value, real-world applications, massive infrastructure spending, and companies already generating substantial revenue. Think about it. Even if Bitcoin doubles from here, that's a 100% return. Fantastic. But institutional capital is looking at AI and seeing opportunities that could potentially generate 5x, 10x, or more over the coming years. And with more AI companies eventually going public, where do you think all that investment capital is going to come from? Money doesn't appear out of thin air. It rotates. And I believe we're witnessing one of the biggest capital rotations in years. Here's something newer investors need to understand: Markets operate in THEMES. And themes eventually change. Remember marijuana stocks? The GameStop/AMC short-squeeze mania? Ebola stocks? COVID work-from-home stocks? Every cycle has its narrative. Every narrative attracts capital. And eventually, capital finds something else. Crypto was a much longer-lasting theme than most. But that doesn't mean it's immune to the same cycle. And here's where things get uncomfortable. Bitcoin launched in 2009. Nearly 18 years later, how much of the original promise has actually materialized? First, the argument was that blockchain and cryptocurrencies would revolutionize the entire financial system. When mass adoption didn't materialize as expected, the narrative increasingly shifted toward decentralization, sovereignty, and freedom from traditional institutions. Now even parts of that thesis face questions about regulation, centralization, and eventually quantum computing. Then came the argument that Bitcoin was simply a store of value. Digital gold. But a store of value still needs to be evaluated against its volatility, purchasing power, and alternative investments. Depending on your entry point, even a multiyear holding period can produce disappointing results while other assets compound. bitcoin:native Which brings me to something I believe far too many investors overlook: OPPORTUNITY COST. Let's say you're holding a cryptocurrency that's down 70%. You tell yourself, "I'll just hold it for another 5 or 10 years. Eventually it'll come back." Maybe it will. But what if, during those same years, you could have compounded your capital in equities or other productive assets? Even if your crypto eventually returns to your purchase price, you haven't necessarily won. You've potentially sacrificed YEARS of compounding. Being right eventually isn't the same as making a good investment. And I say this as someone who has personally experienced it. I was extremely optimistic about Algorand (algorand:native ). In fact, I still believe its underlying technology is among the strongest in the crypto ecosystem. But here's the problem: The market doesn't care what I believe. The price action has spoken. Adoption and investor demand haven't translated into the returns I expected. I still own ALGO, but mentally I've essentially written that investment off. If it eventually recovers, wonderful. That would be a positive surprise. But I'm no longer building my investment thesis around hoping it does. And that's an important lesson. You can love the technology. You can understand the fundamentals. You can have an incredibly convincing argument. And you can STILL be wrong about the investment. A good investor needs to recognize when the market is telling them something different from what they expected. That's not weakness. That's discipline. Now, does this mean Bitcoin can't rally again? Of course not. Could crypto experience another massive short squeeze, speculative run, or even another bull market? Absolutely. But there's a difference between a tradable rally and a sustainable long-term investment thesis. I'm questioning the latter. I believe the bigger picture has changed. The original promise of crypto hasn't materialized to the degree investors expected, and the market now has another technological revolution competing for that capital. AI. And unlike crypto's early promises, AI is already changing how businesses operate, spend money, and generate revenue. That doesn't guarantee AI investments will outperform. Valuations matter, and plenty of AI companies will fail too. But the next generation of 10x opportunities may increasingly come from AI rather than crypto. That's where I believe capital sees the greater opportunity today. Again, I could be completely wrong. And if the market proves me wrong, I'll gladly admit it. But investing isn't about defending a narrative forever. It's about recognizing where opportunity exists, where capital is flowing, and when the original thesis has changed. The market doesn't owe your investment thesis a happy ending. Sometimes the hardest thing for an investor to accept is that the world has moved on while they're still waiting to be proven right. Tough pill to swallow. Curious what everyone thinks: Is crypto still the future, or has AI quietly taken its place as the market's next great wealth-creation opportunity?

You might be addicted to the idea of getting rich. Not the actual process of building wealth. Because building wealth is usually slow, repetitive, and boring. And that's exactly why most people keep chasing shortcuts.

You don't need another trading indicator. You need to stop doing stupid things with the indicators you already have. Harsh? Maybe. True? Absolutely.

Nobody’s talking about the real reason Jensen stepped back. This was a psyop. He needed two things: 1. An excuse to stop being around his family so no one bothers him 2. A way out of the AI grind so he has free time Two birds, one stone. Man just wanted to lock in and play GTA 6 in peace. Smart king.

Bought a new position today . Long $ANGX I think thas has a lot of potential to head higher towards the end of the year..$7+

Hey @grok if Bitcoin just vanished overnight, what would actually break in the real world or financial systems? Credit cards, payment processing, online transactions, banks — would any of that stop working, or does everything just keep functioning completely as normal?

The highest premium is often a trap. Wrong stock or wrong price, and "getting paid to wait" means owning something you never wanted. I'll show how I pick both, live + free, Thu Nov 19, 7 PM ET: specials.livetraders.com/opt… Options trading involves risk. Not financial advice.

Most traders already know what to do. The hard part is doing it the 50th time, under pressure, when nobody is watching. That's what Evolve is for: accountability, direct access to me and a peer group. Apply: livetraders.com/evolve-maste… Not financial advice.

If you've bought three courses and still don't have a plan, the problem isn't effort. Nothing connected the pieces. That's what I'm fixing on Black Friday. Priority list: specials.livetraders.com/bla… Not financial advice.

Most traders spend years trying to solve the wrong problem. They keep searching for something better, hoping it’ll finally change their results. But what if the thing holding you back has nothing to do with finding the next great trade? It’s something I see traders struggle with over and over again. Watch this before placing your next trade. What’s been your biggest struggle in trading? #DayTrading #TradingPsychology #StockMarket #TradingTips #LiveTraders

Watching my P&L tick up and down is the fastest way I know to abandon a good plan. So I hide it and watch my levels instead: my stop, my target, and the price that would change my mind. livetraders.com/level-1?utm_… Not financial advice.

Trade of the Day: $NVDA It gapped down hard. I didn't chase the selloff; I waited for buyers near $150, then went long. Entry $151.38, stop $144. Target hit as NVDA ran past $161. Called it live in my room. 7 days for $7: livetraders.com/level-1?utm_… Not financial advice.

If your trading strategy only works when you're right, you don't have a strategy. You have a prediction. Real traders make money by managing what happens when they're WRONG. That's the difference.

Wow. Jensen Huang just popped the entire AI bubble with his dick. Sir, the charts are flaccid now. Take a bow. $NVDA

Before I click buy, I decide four things: ✓ How much I'm willing to lose ✓ My position size ✓ Where my stop goes ✓ What would prove the trade wrong That's the core of my free Market Decoder training: specials.livetraders.com/mar… Not financial advice.

Three habits that turn small mistakes into big losses: • Buying late • Chasing fakeouts • Averaging down My free Market Decoder training shows why, and what a risk-first trader does instead: specials.livetraders.com/mar… Not financial advice.