Pinned Tweet
Derivatives Trading 82âŹht/mois :
➠Macroéconomie, microéconomie & géopolitique appliquées aux marchés
➠Instruments financiers (dérivés compris)
âž Analyse de lâenvironnement de marchĂ© & approche quantitative
âž ComprĂ©hension de lâactivitĂ© des market makers (hedging, grecques, etc.)
➠Méthodologie de trading (processus décisionnel, routine, gestion du risque)
➠Exercices corrigés : études de cas & mises en situation
➠Simulation de gestion de portefeuille type Hedge Fund Multi stratégies
âž 3 Briefings par jour
âž Flow options Indices Live
âž Flow option single Stocks Live
âž Bloomberg Pro Terminal
➠Flow et données professionnelles Forex, Metals, Bonds, Energies, Grains
Chaque module de formation est découpé en sous-modules. Il y a un socle commun accessible à tous, et des contenus plus avancés.
0 conflit dâintĂ©rĂȘt avec Brokers et Propfirms. Pas de codes promo ni lien dâaffiliation
Public :
Amateurs (Actuel 70%)
Ătudiants Finance (Actuel 20%)
Professionnels (Actuel 10%)
Les banques se sont plantées sur leur consensus haussier post-midterms. JPM, UBS, Citadel lisaient le scrutin comme un « clearing event »
Ăa nâen Ă©tait pas un.
ClĂŽture jeudi : NDX 26 629 (â1 807 pts / â6,36 %).
Mercredi était le dead cat comme dit hier matin.
Chez les hyperscalers, câest lâoversight des data centers et la pause narrative IA, un risk premium rĂ©glementaire, pas le clear que le street avait vendu. Le NFP peut amplifier ou digĂ©rer today.
Derivatives Trading retweeted
Replying to @DerivativeProFR
Bien jouĂ© Ă toi ! Et ton post mâa aidĂ© Ă activer des alertes de mon cĂŽtĂ© đđ»đđ»
Derivatives Trading retweeted
Replying to @DerivativeProFR @FFNFunding
A flat funded account costs the firm zero. No exposure, no risk. So what is a dormancy rule protecting? Nothing. It just pushes traders to force entries they don't believe in.
No dormancy rule at Phidias. No minimum trading days, no counter running in the background. We have never closed an account because a trader waited for the market to come to him, and we never will. Break the drawdown and you're out. That's it.
Waiting is the job.
since when is NOT trading a violation??
one of my students just got 3 accounts shut down by @FFNFunding. 2 of them funded, one in profit. he didn't blow anything, didn't break a single drawdown rule
the reason? their "dormancy" rule. less than 3 trading days in 29 days and your account is gone
dormancy. like a bank account nobody has touched in 10 years. except this guy was there, watching the market, waiting for his setup. he runs his own company, has a day job on top of that, and he only trades when it's clean. which is exactly what I teach him
no setup, no trade. that's not dormancy, that's discipline
and think about it for 2 sec. when he doesn't trade, FFN takes zero risk. zero. a funded account sitting flat costs them nothing. so what is this rule protecting exactly? the only thing it does is push people to click buttons for no reason. and who wins when you overtrade? not you
when he pushed back, support literally told him "I'm just the customer service guy, I'm just following policies"
so it's simple @FFNFunding. either you explain how being patient hurts you, or you refund him. you can't keep the fees AND close the accounts for doing nothing wrong
@PhidiasPropfirm @DojiFunding curious how you guys handle this. would you ever close a funded trader for being patient?
Hier SPX 7 688,62 (+1,58 %), Nasdaq 25 736,51 (+1,44 %) : dead cat bounce.
Le marchĂ© a pricĂ© un Trump bridĂ© + moins dâĂ©missions de dette, + moins de latitude sur lâIran aprĂšs le blue sweep.
Une partie du move, câĂ©tait du vanna, pas un vrai risk-on structurel.
Tant que le bid or et le rally taux restent en place, le reclaim equity dâhier ressemble plus Ă un unwind de hedges quâĂ un rĂ©gime nouveau.
Hier SPX 7 688,62 (+1,58 %), Nasdaq 25 736,51 (+1,44 %) : dead cat bounce.
Le marchĂ© a pricĂ© un Trump bridĂ© + moins dâĂ©missions de dette, + moins de latitude sur lâIran aprĂšs le blue sweep.
Une partie du move, câĂ©tait du vanna, pas un vrai risk-on structurel.
Tant que le bid or et le rally taux restent en place, le reclaim equity dâhier ressemble plus Ă un unwind de hedges quâĂ un rĂ©gime nouveau.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"âwhether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasnât sharp enough down the stretch. Iâm sure thatâs true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollsterâone of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday weâd lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (Sheâs also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcementâby focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, âI told you soâ: youâre right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Letâs take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Blue sweep â gridlock fiscal.
UST : 2a 4,5996 % (â1 pb), 10a 4,9291 % (â2 pb), 30a 5,3093 % (â1 pb).
2s10s ~33 pb, 10s30s ~38 pb.
Le 10a a mené le rally (bas Asie 4,897 %) ; le 30a reste au-dessus de 5,30 % = la prime de terme ne se vend pas.
Le cheque de 5 000 $ Trump est mort ; moins de stimulus, moins de besoin de duration longue.
Pétrole, cracks & courbe
Crack 3-2-1 ~46,9 $ (Ă©tait ~55,7 $ le 30/10, â2,3 $ hier). Diesel crack ~89 $ vs essence ~25 $ : la chaĂźne tient sur le distillat, pas sur le gasoline.
BrentâWTI ~8,1 $. Courbe toujours en backwardation (~17 % annualisĂ© jusquâĂ fin nov); le physical nâa pas lĂąchĂ© avec le prompt.
Hier le front a purgĂ© : WTI â7,4 % Ă 96,46 $, Brent â7,6 % Ă 104,77 $ sur une ouverture diplomatique (feu vert Khamenei + Hormuz en 48 h si conditions). Le prompt est redescendu ; cracks et timespreads, eux, nâont pas collapsĂ©.
Cette nuit, frappes US sur Qeshm â WTI ~98,04 $ (+1,58). Bid gĂ©o de retour, mais sans rupture Hormuz le rallye front nâa pas dâoxygĂšne. Le trade reste sur la courbe et les cracks, pas sur le headline.
ClÎture cash de vendredi : S&P 500 7 580,07 (-1,82 %), Nasdaq 100 28 384,85 (-3,46 %). Ce matin les futures rebondissent : ES 7 648,00 (+0,45 %), NQ 28 776,50 (+0,85 %). Vendredi, le Nasdaq a fait presque deux fois la baisse du S&P, donc c'est la tech qui mÚne le tape. Reste à voir si le marché recommence à payer le capex des hyperscalers sans visibilité sur les retours.
Les gens apprennent chez nous et se régalent.
Fabrice qui est lĂ depuis plus dâun an par exemple, a appris Ă trader en spreads et en options. Il se rĂ©gale.
Vous avez lâembarras du choix sur les formations.
Faites un tour un tour chez nous. Vous ne serez pas déçus si vous bossez.
Nasdaq-100 futures Ă 29 647,50 (â332 / â1,11 %).
$GOOGL : ~10 % aprĂšs hours : miss ads, FCF â9,07 Md$, capex maintenu Ă 195â205 Md$. LâIA qui mange le search, et le search qui ne monĂ©tise plus comme avant.
$MSFT tient (+~3 % AH) grĂące au cash flow Azure.
Le Nasdaq ne subit pas les taux ce matin : il digĂšre le trade IA, hyperscalers vs returns. ES Ă 7 761 (â22,25) suit, mais le pain est dans le NDX.
Derivatives Trading retweeted
Un tweet de @DerivativeProFR est passé dans mon fil. Curieux, j'ai rejoint la formation.
Bilan : je comprends enfin les options, la volatilitĂ© et la gestion du risque, avec un accompagnement pro. Aucun regret, je recommande. đŻ














