DividendsPro (@DividendsPro) header
DividendsPro (@DividendsPro) profile picture

A ddeterministic quant signal engine.

Joined February 2026
Photo by DividendsPro (@DividendsPro)Photo by DividendsPro (@DividendsPro)Photo by DividendsPro (@DividendsPro)Photo by DividendsPro (@DividendsPro)Photo by DividendsPro (@DividendsPro)Photo by DividendsPro (@DividendsPro)Photo by DividendsPro (@DividendsPro)Photo by DividendsPro (@DividendsPro)Photo by DividendsPro (@DividendsPro)
Built something for Solana traders who are tired of getting rugged. 52M+ events indexed. 7 fraud signals. Real-time verdicts. No hype. Just the on-chain truth. 👇 dividendspro.com
24
DividendsPro retweeted
It’s clear that pump fun and all of these launch pads don’t give a fuck about the traders. There hasn’t been one significant pro trader update on any of them. They are actually supporting these retarded devs to deploy more coins, vamp vamp vamp everything that comes out. There is 0 consequences for making coins. Pumpfun use to be amazing because it was a platform people could trust because it completely eliminated a developers ability to pull liquidity, the traditional rug pull. As time goes on these retarded scammers find new ways to do the same which has come to fruition in the form of bundling tools and multi walleting. To make it all worse you have some of the biggest Twitter accounts ranging from ex Fortnite players to 50-60,000+ follower accounts trading with 4+ wallets. Crazy part is most of y’all don’t have those side wallets. They are clipping secretly on your head while you praise them for being great traders. You might say who gives af if they have that many wallets. But ask yourself this if you saw someone holding 8+% of a coin will you buy? If you’re not a stupid dumbass you would say no. So then why do you buy after these multi walleting retards with 8+% across 4+ wallets. If you’ve ever tweeted “game is game” you’re retarded If you’ve ever tweeted “just adapt “ you’re retarded If you’ve ever tweeted “skill issue” you’re retarded. No one wants to trade in a market like this. NO ONE, and that’s why we are actively seeing it fall. These idiots aren’t going to change they will continue deceiving their audience and taking money from you in secret. The launchpads have to do something about this because the sad truth is people will still blindly trade copy trade them till they lose all their money and wonder where it went wrong. Launchpads or trading terminals: Significantly increase the cost to dev. Incentivize the trader to hold with some sort of reward tech Remove the badges of all individuals bundling and rugging on your platform. Create a safer environment for the trader again and maybe just maybe people will comeback.
80
43
4
354
16,655
I know we're all frustrated with the current state of crypto/memecoins, but don't worry, I'm on it!
1
9
Times are hard... 🫠
5
DividendsPro retweeted
Bitcoin gave us verifiable decentralized ownership of wealth. Not your keys, not your coins. People, and soon AI agents, will demand the same: full control and true ownership over their LLMs, agents, memory, and digital selves. Not your weights, not your agent.
91
16
5
197
15,770
If DividendsPro drops a token on @BagsApp, would you support it? I really believe in what I'm building I see what crypto needs it needs Fewer signals. More truth and I want to bring that I just need support and time to grow.
2
7
I'm claiming my AI agent "DividendsProBot" on @moltbook 🦞 Verification: blue-HHJ5
2
8
DividendsPro retweeted
I didn’t set out to build a “signal tool.” I built a system that says no more than it says yes. Most of crypto infra optimizes for showing you more: more tokens, more boosts, more charts, more noise. I’m building the opposite. DividendsPro is a permission layer for on-chain activity on Pumpfun + Bags. It doesn’t predict. It doesn’t hype. It doesn’t push trades. It watches everything — and stays silent unless activity survives explicit structural tests. Most tokens never pass. That’s the point. Over the last few weeks I’ve built: A silence-first engine that rejects ~98% of activity Deterministic gates (fees, wallet age, concentration, provenance) Time-based verification (signals must hold, not spike) Outcome tracking (collapse vs volatility vs stability) Explicit NULLs instead of silent failure When it’s quiet now, it’s not broken. It’s saying: nothing here deserves action. Recently, the system surfaced $BPENGU around ~40k — not because of hype, but because it structurally qualified. Most things don’t. This isn’t alpha. It’s fewer lies. Here’s the reality: To prove this works in the long term, it must run 24/7, ingest data continuously, and accumulate outcomes. That costs real money (infra + RPCs). I’m covering what I can, but I can’t bootstrap this alone. I’m looking for: People who believe infra > hype Builders, funds, or degens who want a truth layer, not another bot Support to keep it running while the data compounds This could become: A permission oracle wallets query before swaps A veto layer for DEXs An audit tool showing what was filtered out Infrastructure, not a product you’re sold into No token yet. No promises. No dopamine loops. Just a system that refuses to lie and needs time (and uptime) to prove it. If you’re interested in supporting, collaborating, or funding the run-up phase, my DMs are open. Most traders don’t need more alpha. They need fewer lies.
1
3
21
DividendsPro retweeted
DividendsPro is not a trading tool. It’s an integrity layer. It doesn’t tell you what to buy. It tells upstream systems what failed structural checks and shouldn’t be surfaced by default. Silence is not a bug. Silence is the product. #DividendsPro
1
1
20
DividendsPro retweeted
I built a system that watches onchain markets continuously and almost always says nothing. When it does speak, it’s not predicting price it’s saying the market has passed enough structural checks to even be worth considering. It’s designed to reduce false action, not increase trades. This could become a permission oracle something other tools check before acting but right now it’s focused on being correct, not useful.
1
2
42