There are actually two issues here: 1. It is a foul for an illegal block in the back. 2. The receiving team player being block is considered “passive” since he is not actively engaged with the kicking team player. That block forces him into the ball. Since he is considered “passive”, he is deemed *not* to have touched the ball. Assuming no one else from the receiving team touched the before the kickers, the ball should belong to the receiving team at the spot of the kicking team recovery. <sarcasm> I eagerly await the weekly suspension list from the SEC for the Referee overseeing this disaster. <end sarcasm>