Domain investor https://xitter.cf/t.co/SH7J5A3SOi https://xitter.cf/t.co/LKCP4XHlTU https://xitter.cf/t.co/HXodNK9iuH

Domain
Joined November 2025
It reached $425 in the final minutes, but I won’t accept that, especially since I set a reserve price, and the bids didn’t even come close to it.
🚨 First bid is in $100 The auction is officially underway 🔥 Place your bid now👇 atom.com/domain-auctions/inj…
7
Limited time offer .si domains pumped.si - $3000 injection.si $3000 Quantities.si $2000 TheMoney.si $2000 TwoWay.si $2000 Phonex.si $1500 Flamingos.si $1000
34
🚨 First bid is in $100 The auction is officially underway 🔥 Place your bid now👇 atom.com/domain-auctions/inj…
injection .si available on Atom auction
1
42
injection .si available on Atom auction
1
90
NeoGrid.si available for acquisition
39
Before the .si hype: Domain appraisal tools are a joke, Never trust automated valuations After Atom started giving .si domains high valuations: Atom values my domain at $25,000, but I'm letting it go for ONLY $2,999 What a steal Funny how quickly opinions change 😂 Yesterday, appraisal tools were worthless. Today, they're suddenly the gold standard of domain valuation. The tools didn't change. The numbers just started flattering their owners 🤡
3
10
958
Pumped.si available for acquisition
2
109
GoMeet.si available for acquisition
Haha, just as I was talking about interesting patterns in .si sales today… here comes another surprise! 😅 At this point, I’m starting to think there’s no pattern at all. Almost anything can surprise us in this market! #si #superintelligence #domains #domaininvesting
1
6
199
Kboard.si available for acquisition
2
151
I came across a post about a domain sale, only to realize it was a domain I had previously sold for much less. Apparently, the seller might be the same person who bought it from me. The funniest part? He blocked me, and I don't even know him 😂 My friend, this is the domain business. You spotted an opportunity, bought low, and sold high. Congratulations 🎉 Yes, I sold it cheaply because of a mistake, but I have no regrets. That's how this market works. I'm just curious about one thing… why the block 😂
1
6
408
An interesting start for Superintelligence.ly. I recently received a $350 offer for the domain, which I declined. A good starting point, but we're still a zero away from an interesting conversation 😅
68
Received an offer for Injection .si and sent back a counteroffer. Let's see where this deal goes🍿
78
Sold Quantity .si at auction for $125 😬 I had listed it for auction and thought I had already canceled it. When I realized it was still active, I went to cancel it, only to discover that someone had already placed a bid 🤦 I also own Quantities.si
9
1
1
41
1,721
Don't be an enemy Buy Superintelligence.ly
JUST IN: Trump declares anyone who uses the term Artificial Intelligence instead of Super Intelligence is “THE ENEMY!”
91
Superintelligence.ly available for sale
JUST IN: U.S. Justice Department directs employees to use “super intelligence” instead of AI — including in official court filings — under Trump’s executive order.
1
76
Sold. It expires in about a month, and since I wasn’t planning to renew it, I decided to lower the price.
1
142
This makes me even more confident that I made the right move when I acquired atm .app
On July 31, I bought Supa .app for ~$1K and sold it a month later for 41x. Yesterday, I spotted Kore .app at auction. Similar quality and commercial potential, so I bid $2,600. Not enough. Now I wonder if I share too much publicly. Congrats to the buyer!
1
1
712
Hey @MichaelArnaldi , you’ve got Effectful .co and Effect .website, but somehow Effectss.com is still out there. Just thought I’d put it on your radar.
1
124
Gname auction system is making serious bidding unnecessarily difficult. I really like @gnamedotcom, and their support team has been excellent in my experience. Fast, responsive, and genuinely helpful. But their auction deposit system needs to be reconsidered. Why should I have to deposit and lock 20% of my intended bid just to participate in an auction? And if someone outbids me? I have to lock another 20% based on the new amount just to continue bidding. Imagine an auction going from $1,000 → $2,000 → $3,000 → $5,000. You’re not simply bidding anymore. You’re constantly moving more money into the platform and locking it just to keep participating. For serious domain investors, especially those bidding on multiple names, this can tie up a substantial amount of capital for no real reason. I understand the logic behind it. Gname wants to make sure bidders actually have the money and prevent winners from walking away without paying. But there are other ways to enforce that. If someone wins an auction and refuses to pay, ban the account from future auctions. Make the consequences serious enough that people have an incentive to honor their bids. That seems much more reasonable than forcing every legitimate bidder to repeatedly deposit and lock additional funds every time the auction price increases. And there’s another problem. Deposited funds aren’t simply available to withdraw whenever you want, which makes the whole process even more restrictive. I honestly don’t understand why a bidder should need to keep capital locked up just to have the option to bid. The auction should be about who is willing to pay the most, not who is willing to keep the most money locked inside the platform. Gname has a great platform and, in my experience, great customer support. But this particular system feels unnecessarily complicated and unlike what domain investors are accustomed to elsewhere. I really hope Gname takes another look at this. Simplify the bidding. Keep the accountability. Give serious bidders more flexibility.
2
2
107