It reached $425 in the final minutes, but I won’t accept that, especially since I set a reserve price, and the bids didn’t even come close to it.
🚨 First bid is in $100
The auction is officially underway 🔥
Place your bid now👇
atom.com/domain-auctions/inj…
Limited time offer .si domains
pumped.si - $3000
injection.si $3000
Quantities.si $2000
TheMoney.si $2000
TwoWay.si $2000
Phonex.si $1500
Flamingos.si $1000
🚨 First bid is in $100
The auction is officially underway 🔥
Place your bid now👇
atom.com/domain-auctions/inj…
Before the .si hype:
Domain appraisal tools are a joke, Never trust automated valuations
After Atom started giving .si domains high valuations:
Atom values my domain at $25,000, but I'm letting it go for ONLY $2,999 What a steal
Funny how quickly opinions change 😂
Yesterday, appraisal tools were worthless.
Today, they're suddenly the gold standard of domain valuation.
The tools didn't change. The numbers just started flattering their owners 🤡
GoMeet.si available for acquisition
Haha, just as I was talking about interesting patterns in .si sales today… here comes another surprise! 😅
At this point, I’m starting to think there’s no pattern at all. Almost anything can surprise us in this market!
#si #superintelligence #domains #domaininvesting
I came across a post about a domain sale, only to realize it was a domain I had previously sold for much less.
Apparently, the seller might be the same person who bought it from me. The funniest part? He blocked me, and I don't even know him 😂
My friend, this is the domain business. You spotted an opportunity, bought low, and sold high. Congratulations 🎉
Yes, I sold it cheaply because of a mistake, but I have no regrets. That's how this market works.
I'm just curious about one thing… why the block 😂
An interesting start for Superintelligence.ly.
I recently received a $350 offer for the domain, which I declined.
A good starting point, but we're still a zero away from an interesting conversation 😅
Sold Quantity .si at auction for $125 😬
I had listed it for auction and thought I had already canceled it. When I realized it was still active, I went to cancel it, only to discover that someone had already placed a bid 🤦
I also own Quantities.si
Don't be an enemy
Buy Superintelligence.ly
Superintelligence.ly available for sale
Sold. It expires in about a month, and since I wasn’t planning to renew it, I decided to lower the price.
injection.si
It’s time to inject the next leap from ai to si.
This makes me even more confident that I made the right move when I acquired atm .app
Hey @MichaelArnaldi , you’ve got Effectful .co and Effect .website, but somehow Effectss.com is still out there.
Just thought I’d put it on your radar.
Gname auction system is making serious bidding unnecessarily difficult.
I really like @gnamedotcom, and their support team has been excellent in my experience. Fast, responsive, and genuinely helpful.
But their auction deposit system needs to be reconsidered.
Why should I have to deposit and lock 20% of my intended bid just to participate in an auction?
And if someone outbids me?
I have to lock another 20% based on the new amount just to continue bidding.
Imagine an auction going from $1,000 → $2,000 → $3,000 → $5,000.
You’re not simply bidding anymore. You’re constantly moving more money into the platform and locking it just to keep participating.
For serious domain investors, especially those bidding on multiple names, this can tie up a substantial amount of capital for no real reason.
I understand the logic behind it. Gname wants to make sure bidders actually have the money and prevent winners from walking away without paying.
But there are other ways to enforce that.
If someone wins an auction and refuses to pay, ban the account from future auctions. Make the consequences serious enough that people have an incentive to honor their bids.
That seems much more reasonable than forcing every legitimate bidder to repeatedly deposit and lock additional funds every time the auction price increases.
And there’s another problem. Deposited funds aren’t simply available to withdraw whenever you want, which makes the whole process even more restrictive.
I honestly don’t understand why a bidder should need to keep capital locked up just to have the option to bid.
The auction should be about who is willing to pay the most, not who is willing to keep the most money locked inside the platform.
Gname has a great platform and, in my experience, great customer support.
But this particular system feels unnecessarily complicated and unlike what domain investors are accustomed to elsewhere.
I really hope Gname takes another look at this.
Simplify the bidding. Keep the accountability. Give serious bidders more flexibility.



















