Peter Galanko known as @xvgwhale in 2017 before account hack, helped popularize XVG. Now I post about theology, fitness, photography. Oppose Islam, God is love.
Virginia Beach, VA
Joined October 2019
- Tweets67.3K
- Following2.1K
- Followers2.3K
- Likes32K
Pinned Tweet
A good metaphor for Islam is:
a spoonful of shit can ruin a whole pot of stew
The pot of stew being Abrahamic religion and the concept of monotheism, the spoonfuls of shit being all the stuff Muhammad changed and added
Took something good and made it not safe for humanity
A lot of more wholesome Muslims favorite teachings in Islam, like God shows no mercy to those who show no mercy to others, come from the Bible. Though there’s a lot of good bits of the stew in the Bible Muhammad left behind, and a whole lot of spoonfuls of shit he added
I wrote a really sweet heartfelt defense of Christianity and indictment against the horrors against mankind that Muhammad inflicted on others and still inspired to this day
And for some reason X flagged it as “hateful conduct” keeping my shadow banned
No clue which part was a problem for twitter, will post it again in parts to see which part is flagged or what(sometimes it has happened, and then when posted in smaller parts, doesn’t get flagged).
I really don’t understand, in my opinion Elon Musks posts more abrasive stuff sometimes than I do. Not sure why his app would do that. I just stated facts and condemned Muhammad for being a bully. I being wholesome not mean
This is such a wild Hadith
sunnah.com/bukhari:5825
Ashia says no woman lives worse than a believing woman
Then Muhammed tells a woman who had been beaten till her skin turned green that she has to have sex with the man who beat her up before he’ll allow her to divorce him
1
22
Islam is from Satan, literally.
The spread islam should be classified as an epidemic and every sane government should take actions to isolate it and prevent its spread. Genuinely. Should be common sense honestly.
You couldn’t make a faith more satanic if you tried honestly, the fact that Muslims pass off Muhammed as a wholesome figure (and not just a good figure, the “perfect person”. Literally it’s not possible for those who believe the Sunnah 100% and believe 100% that Muhammed was morally perfect to not have corrupted morals themselves) just makes Islam more satanic not less.
1
This video will have you scratching your head in confusion.
Muhammed was a bigot. Just a fact of life.
17
People mistakenly believe that supporting Islamists gains you favor among Islamists.
Once Muhammed began his jihadist campaign, virtually anyone invited to Islam who didn’t join was considered an enemy.
His tattoo says مقاومة, muqawama, meaning "resistance". The meaning of resistance in the context of Hamas is resistance against nonbelievers and the rights of nonbelievers to self govern. Not sure why he thought he would be excluded as a nonbeliever/infidel.
One of the stories from the Sunnah that shows the nature of how Islam reciprocates hostility is what happened to the the tribe of Banu Qurayza. Banu Qurayza was a Jewish tribe of about 2000 people. When Muhammed’s army first came to the tribe, the people of Banu Qurayza gave Muhammed’s army trench digging tools as a gift for a peace offering. Muhammed’s army later returned and attacked. After the tribe surrendered, they asked if they could go back to their homes to get some belongings(before starting their lives as slaves/captives), which angered Muhammed’s companions so much they decided to start killing them instead.
According to the Sunnah, Muhammad’s army inspected the Jewish children naked to check for pubic hairs, the boys who had grown pubes were beheaded along with the adults(including elderly too). 800-900 Jews were beheaded, and burried in trenches dug with the tools they had previously gifted Muhammed’s army. The woman were taken as sex slaves, most sex trafficked as concubines and sold for camels and weapons. Though Muhammad kept one for himself, a widow whose husband had just been killed and Muhammed began raping her that very same month.
Long story short, once a Jewish tribe gave Muhammed’s army a gift of trench digging tools, and Muhammed’s army returned and commited a genocide and burried the bodies in trenches dug with the tools gifted to them by the same tribe. Children as young as 9 to 14 years old were beheaded along with the adult men and their widowed mothers were raped and sex trafficked and the toddlers were enslaved as well. That’s sorta how Islam reciprocated support of their “resistance” even back when islam first started.
The concept of returning the favor doesn’t exist in islam when it comes to infidels. In fact kindness and pacifism is the ultimate vulnerability to be exploited in Islamic conquest, and is how Muslims conquered 1/3rd of the earths population with 150 years of Muhammed’s birth - by being more unscrupulous than people expect. Pretty sure the religion aspect of Islam only existed to make people feel a false sense of security before so call religious people plunder them.
Reminds me of some trans influencer who talks about donating money with Palestinians. He/she took no offense to that many denied his/her request to video call, as the he-she figured they just liked privacy. In reality, the goth trans person would literally be lynched by the same people she donated to if she ever walked the streets.
Once over in the “West Bank”, a secular band with a gay member was booked to perform at a venue, so the locals burned down the venue before the show could occur. And the band were the same type of western “free Palestine” type of people.
Though no matter how much that sort of thing occurs, pro-pali-leftists will still act like they’re mutual allies of each-other when in reality the same people all partied the day of 9/11 as they seriously wish death upon each and everyone of us including those who support them.
Italian activist Vittorio Arrigoni moved to Gaza to support the Palestinians.
He was then kidnapped, tortured and executed because his captors viewed him as an “infidel.”
19
It’s disturbing that Google ai overviews do not take a neutral stance on Islam, ai takes a favorable and defensive stance.
Sometimes if you research a topic, not only will it tell you about what you’re researching, it will provide a rebuttal to stuff you didn’t even include in your search(as in a rebuttal to an argument that could be made against Islam related to your search, even if your search term wasn’t suggesting any argument).
It sometimes also includes highly deceptive deflections from topics while directly contradicting what Islamic scholars say on the issue(when what the Islamic scholars say sounds bad by western standards).
I’ve posted some examples in the past and will post more in the future, though I encourage anyone who hasn’t to start researching Islam and learn both from the Islamic scholars and Sunnah itself then compare and contrast with how the Google ai explains the same topics. Google ai always takes a defensive approach to soften Islam and sometimes in direct contradiction with Islamic scholars.
Basically for some reason, the way it’s programmed for cultural sensitivity causes Google ai to be a master of taqiyya. Very concerning honestly as it genuinely would mislead any person who doesn’t know any better(and hasn’t studied the Quran and Sunnah and Tafsir and watched how it’s taught in context by Islamic scholars) would be mislead easily. Also when researching statistics and there’s multiple studies and sources, often it will use whichever one sounds least bad at the forefront of the overview. Often it’s like the opposite of an objective neutral scholarly overview and straight up propagates Islamic theology while understating the brutality of Islamic history and minimizing the harsh realities that exist in Islamic countries in modern times.
I’m sure others who study it will notice the same thing.
12
Meanwhile, if you watch videos of street preachers in U.K., you will find numerous instances where police tell them not to mention other faiths of religious figures(including videos where people came up to them and asked a question that brought up the topic. Including where they’re being polite.
Which is effectively like softcore blasphemy law, as police will stop you if you preach on the corner and call Muhammad a “false prophet” as the police say it’s confrontational. The Muslim Brotherhood agenda entails trying to bring blasphemy law to the west in some way, and much of the U.K. is too naive they’re already giving up religious freedoms to Islam. Critiquing other religions is just a basic part of religious freedom(they do have speakers corner for debate, but that’s a specific place and time rather than full freedom everywhere).
Though of course that applies to public preaching rather than private conversations, but still. Jesus preached publicly and criticized religious leaders of the time.
Though mind you, U.K. has never had such a thing as freedom of speech. For example, insulting a person is criminalized in U.K., look up “insult law”. It’s not like and never has been like the U.S. that has a constitution that guarantees freedom of speech.
Police in U.K. see encouragement to convert to Christianity as hate speech or something. Yet I’m sure the U.K. police have no issue with the opposite.
Anyway, just saying, there’s a clear one sided double standard.
In Britain, Muslims are now knocking on Christians’ doors on Sundays, trying to convert them to Islam.
1
52
There’s a reason you don’t hear of Muslim NDEs where they see Muhammed.
Muhammed designed a way to explain away if Muslims see hell in a near death experience.
If you had an NDE of hell Muhammed would have told you “don’t worry, that’s normal”. IMO Muhammed was led by satan.
If you were Muslim and even had an NDE and saw Muhammed and felt like you were in Heaven, you be called a heretic for not seeing Hell.
Revelation 20:10 ESV
“And the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.”
50
A Muslim majority city has banned pride flags from public flag poles.
An interesting detail is they simultaneously voted to allow flying the “flags of nations representing the immigrant heritage of residents”, so on government property the can fly flags of foreign countries that the residents allegedly sought “asylum” to “escape”.
While I’m not big on LGBTQ being shoved in everyone’s faces, I find it hateful in the context that they ruled continue flying the Somali flag as that represents not only intolerance to homosexuals but to almost everyone else. As well as represents undeniable sexual immorality as 24% of married women in Somalia polled reported that they got married when below the age of 15.
Indisputably, the Somali flag represents a large scale normalization of pedophilia, with high end of marriage statistics prove that up to 1 in 4 adult men living in Somalia have(or will have, if unmarried) raped a child.
For them to conclude that the LGBTQ flag represents sexual immorality BUT the Somali flag DOESN’T is what is TRULY hateful.
Not only does Somalia champion pedophilia(claims sex with a child - in normal countries, that’s known as “rape” - forced into marriage isn’t rape or pedophilia as long as parents sign off on it. Fact check this, law makers in Somalia are trying to legally recognize the age of sexual consent for marriage to be the first day of a child’s first period. Fact), Somalia also champions incest and child genitalia mutilation.
As for the incest, that’s not a jab at Ilhan Omar for marrying her biological brother. It’s a reference to the fact that between 40% to 49% of all marriages in Somalia involve level incest between blood relatives. Genetic data puts the number at 48.7% which is the most objective measure.
As for the child genitalia mutilation, that’s not an obscure reach. 99.2% of grown women in Somalia have undergone FGM. Virtually mandatory for every woman, the 0.8% probably severe disabilities. FGM stands for “female genitalia mutilation”, though since it occurs to girls when they’re children I think “child genital mutilation” is an appropriate wording. Once a girl reaches between 5 and 11 years old, an adult(typically a relative or local iman or a doctor) slices off the girl’s clitoris. This isn’t done through a formal surgical procedure in a proper medical setting, it is done with a knife without using anesthesia.
While the fact that 99.2% of girls in Somalia undergo FGM suggests that not only does government(in Islamic government, the local authorities are the imans) condone it but literally requires it. Though for show, Somalia’s constitution outlaws the practice. Which has reduced the practice by 0%, so obviously that was added to their constitution so the government could be blameless while in reality, the local level government authorities(the imans/islamic scholars) literally require the procedure.
The Somali flag represents a country that sexually mutilates children, forces young girls as young a 8 years old into marriage, while criminalizing homosexuality as if they have a moral higher ground.
Not only that, the Somali flag is a symbol of fascism - due to the objective fact that Somalia has an objectively fascist government.
Unaware that Somalia is fascist? Well it doesn’t get more fascist than a totalitarian theocracy that criminalizes basic religious freedoms. 99.9% of Somalis are Sunni Muslim, and that’s by force as propagating(as in publicly teaching or building any church or synagogue or temple) ANY religion besides Sunni Islam is criminalized and strictly forbidden by Somalia’s constitution.
Liberals might be interested in the fact that abortion is criminalized including the abortion pill in the the first weeks of pregnancy, I know they call that “fascist” when a western nonmuslim suggests it. Or the fact that Somalia criminalizes homosexuality with a punishment of 3 years in prison for a first offense(realistically they just do honor killings like how Gaza does).
Genuine asylum seekers don’t generally celebrate the government that they fled, especially a fascist government that enables rape of children on a scale that most people can’t comprehend.
24.3% of married women in Somalia were married before the age of 15 while 41.7% are married before 18. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article… 48.7% of those marriages being incestuous relationships between 2 blood relatives(not to shame the women, as Somalia has a literal 100% rate of arranged marriage. Women and men do not participate in choosing a spouse by dating prior to marriage, dating before marriage is prohibited in that culture as the father selects a husband for their daughter and it is arranged based on a dowery payment. Girls typically are not given the option to refuse an arranged marriage and many marriages in Somalia occur without the girl’s consent).
Genuine asylum seekers oppose the form of government they are fleeing. The Islamic migrants propagating for their home countries are not asylum seekers they’re imperialists who genuinely believe in having a government like there’s.
You lose the right to claim the LGBTQ flag celebrates sexual immorality when you simultaneously fly a flag that is synonymous with near record setting (“near” as unfortunately there’s other Muslim countries that rival Somalia’s pedophilic marriages rates) pedophilia, incest, and slicing off adolescent girl’s clitorises(obviously something thought of by insecure men afraid of infidelity, as that’s what they think will happen if women got pleasure from sex so they devised a way to make sex less pleasant for women besides just forcing them into marriage).
You have to have the moral higher ground to claim a moral higher ground. Plus Somalia’s history and laws are so bigoted and intolerant towards so many different groups that in my opinion the flag is as hateful and offensive as publicly flying a Nazi flag. Some people may see the ban of the rainbow flag as a step forward though replacing it with a Somali flag is 10 steps backwards.
1
69
Yet somehow, the gays will still simp for Islamic immigration and protest Islamic deportation, even if the majority of these type of Muslim communities believe in the death penalty for homosexuality. Many would even proudly cheer a Somali flag.
The context below is a Somali attended event in Norway, where they discuss the death penalty for homosexuals. 99% of the crowd raised their hand to agree with those types of death penalties. About 1/3rd of Norway’s Muslim population is Somali, and this video just goes to show the type of beliefs that are normalized in Somalia. Y’all’s allies are not practicing Muslims, your allies are Muslim apostates.
To prevent bigotry in America as seen below, United States should have a strict apostate-only immigration policy for people coming from extremist islamic countries like Somalia. If U.S. and all European countries all had the same policy, there would be real change from within the Islamic world as many want western citizenship as it turns out the Islamic way of life sorta has a lot of drawbacks. Instead western countries are passing laws against criticizing Islam, despite the fact Islam contains an elaborate blueprint for a form of government and sets of laws and is literally a political ideology to all genuine practicing Muslims. You can’t genuinely believe Muhammed was a prophet if you oppose what Muhammed did and taught, and the main thing Muhammed did in his life is brought Islamic government to nonmuslim populations.
I know that a lot of the LGBTQ community aren’t fans of Christianity due to the Bible teaching that gay sex is sexual immortality, though many don’t consider the fact that in Christianity (but not in Islam’s version of Jesus) Jesus stopped a woman from being stoned for sexual immortality by saying “he who hath no sin cast the first stone”. All true Christians consider themselves sinners, it’s not just a label for others. Jesus taught salvation rather than condemnation. Muhammed taught condemnation rather than salvation, which is why Muslims claim that Jesus didn’t stop a woman from being stoned and instead teach that Jesus would have upheld sharia law.
While Jesus stopping stoning and Jews reformed and ended the practice of stoning, Muhammed doubled down of the stoning traditions derived from the Old Testament (the Quran and Sunnah plagiarized the Bible and added a bunch of insane drivel and changed a lot of the good parts. See my pinned tweet for the perfect example) and ordered and watched stonings of both men and women as well Muslims and nonmuslims.
The fact Muhammed ordered and spectated the stoning to death of some nonmuslims sets a precedent that some Muslims genuinely believe Islamic law should be forced on nonmuslims(and if you know the story of Muhammed’s ordering the torture of POWs, you know that cruelty and humiliation is part of the spirit of the teachings, not just justice), and the sentiment of Islamic law that carries death penalty is essentially wishing death on others, basically extreme hatred.
In the Bible, Jesus condemns anger and hatred as a sin as he says it’s like murder in the heart and thus a violation of the sixth commandment as it’s akin to wishing death on someone. Meanwhile, the Sunnah teachs hate as a merit, and teaches that Allah teaches Angel Gabriel which people to hate so that Gabriel can spread that hate to all of God’s people.
“And when Allah hates a slave, He calls Jibril and says: 'I hate so- and-so, so hate him.' Then Jibril also hates him. He (Jibril) then announces amongst the inhabitants of heavens: 'Verily, Allah hates so- and-so, so you also hate him.' Thus they also start to hate him. Then he becomes the object of hatred on the earth also".” Riyad as-Salihin 387 sunnah.com/riyadussalihin:38… Hate of others is taught as merit in Muslim teachings. Islamic scholar Assim Hakeem discusses some of the logic of hating others for the “sake of Allah” in this video youtu.be/H1OJoP7XkJc?is=cnsT…
Anyway, big big difference.
139
All flights in United States canceled today after a “communications outage”.
You’d think the FAA would have robust redundancy so if one system failed they could fire up another one.
Anyway, it’s not being called a hack and no mention of terrorism, though sure is odd(my first thought was maybe Iran, maybe North Korea, sorta doubt Russia or China would, idk). It said network routers started going out at an airport in Chicago and shortly after spread to all other airports.
A glitch that spreads from one airport to all other airports seems like something that should be impossible to happen.
The only possible glitch that I can think of that result in it spreading to every airport would be a buggy system update that was installed on all the routers around the same time.
Like imagine if a home internet router went out and then all the sudden every home in an entire city’s internet routers went out. Just doesn’t happen like that. While a network of routers are all interconnected in some way, the data that is relayed shouldn’t be able to affect the firmware / operating systems they use regardless of what data was being sent and received(or at least you’d think it couldn’t).
I’m sure it’s a different type of router than a home computer router, but still. It just seems improbable to happen by chance. Seems more probable there was a malicious element to intentionally sabotage. And if there wasn’t, then clearly they have a flawed system. I wouldn’t be surprised if the technology is out of date. Technology like that which is used 24/7 in constant demand is tricky to swap out nationwide without there being downtime for the network and there is just no room for downtime at the major airports with 24/7 departures and arrivals.
Who knows, though surely there’s a better system with another layer of redundancy they could be using and just aren’t. Like so there could be two or more separate fully functional networks that pilots and air traffic controllers could use for communications with a backup network being available 24/7 running simultaneously just in case.
Oh well, will be interesting to see. I wonder if Iran or North Korea was even capable and responsible for a hack if that would be reported. If an adversary was responsible might make sense for that to not be divulged to not get them the recognition for it as a victory for them. Iran’s propaganda team is pretty stupid for not just taking credit for it even if they didn’t do it because would sound impressive to their people and if U.S. denied it people probably wouldn’t believe it wasn’t a hack.
Though no one accused Iran’s propaganda team of being smart. All they know how to do is call every other world leaders “pedophiles”, while in reality 1 in every 40 marriages in Iran is between a grown male pedophile and a child 13 or younger. The legal age there is only 13 while they simultaneously allow marriage to brides under 13 via a loophole involving local government permission.
Iran also made it legal for a step father to marry their own step daughter when she turns 13, absolutely disgusting and due to the fact Muhammed married a daughter in law(who was also his first cousin, had been married to Muhammad’s adopted son when he began lusting after he as Muhammed was a man of lust not a man of faith. The fact Islam doesn’t comprehend that lust isn’t the highest level of enlightenment even their teaching for the highest level of heaven exclusively for martyrdom is completely sexualized(Sunan Ibn Majah 4337 sunnah.com/ibnmajah:4337 details how men who get to the highest level of heaven will have slave girls, girls selected from hell with “desirable front passages” and the man “will have a male member that never becomes flaccid”. So just sex with slave girls for infinity while having an erection 24/7 for trillions and trillions of years. That is literally just what the Muslim faith promises martyrs and only martyrs. Oh, and husband and wife are not reunited in Islamic heaven). Creepy.
1
1
401
Got off topic at the end explaining Islam, though one horribly corrupt aspect about the Islamic teaching of heaven as shown below is the implication that the 72 virgins are the souls of women sent to hell sunnah.com/ibnmajah:4337 is that they believe Allah would punish infidel women with rape as sex slaves.
This is especially disturbing considering in real life, Muhammed had both a Coptic Christian sex slave and Jewish sex slaves(one from Banu Qurayza, her sexual slavery began the same month her family-including her husband-was slaughtered by Muhammed’s army).
Maria al-Qibtiyya (Coptic Christian) and Safiyya bint Huyayy (Jewish woman captured in the battle of Khaybar) and Rayhana bint Zayd (Jewish woman from Banu Qurayza) were all abducted women, prisoners of war. Their relationships with Muhammed did not happen consensually, just a fact. Maria and Safiyya did wind up converting to Islam and marrying Muhammed(doubtfully by choice, may have been somewhat of an upgrade from slave), Islamic scholars dispute whether Rayhana was ever made a full wife(considering 100% of her male relatives and acquaintances were murdered in captivity after surrendering, Banu Qurayza was turned into a death camp temporarily after they were defeated. Out of the tribe of 2,000 people, 800-900 were beheaded. The remaining 1,200 were the females(well besides one who was executed for dropping a rock on one of Muhammed’s bandit’s heads) and adolescent boys, 100% of which were enslaved. The adolescent boys that were spared were inspected for pubic hairs and only the hairless adolescent boys were kept alive according to the Sunnah which includes a section of one of the survivors who shared part of his story here: sunnah.com/abudawud:4404 which proves that Muhammed’s army had a preference for hairless adolescent boys. There’s no way anyone can convince me that grown men who sex trafficked 100% of the women of Banu Qurayza and forced widows into sexual slavery as concubines immediately didn’t have any sexual motives in stripping all the boys naked and checking their ball sacks for pubic hairs. Google ai overview about that part of the Sunnah makes it sound like it was just a good way to differentiate between children and adults, as if a boy who grew had just grown his first pube isn’t still a child. Btw the boys who were found have had grown pubes were immediately beheaded and dumped in a trench dug with trench digging tools that the same tribe has previously gifted Muhammed’s army as a peace offering directly before Muhammed’s army came back and invaded.)
Anyway, understanding Islam means understanding that
A: they believe that Allah uses rape to punish women who go to hell. Meaning objectively Islam has a context of rape that they consider divinely ordained by God.
B: Muhammed himself raped female captives and he is said to be perfect and sinless(and it’s important to note, if the woman were Muslim, it’d have been considered rape and adultery for Muhammed to have sex with them before marriage. Islamic teachings in the Sunnah and Quran give an exception to adultery which doesn’t classify sex with a nonmuslim female captive as adultery for the man.).
And that explains why Dr. Zakir says in this video that if a woman is dressed immodestly(and by immodest/provoking sex, Zakir specifically means not wearing a burqa and not covering their hair) that if she is raped and murdered it “is not an injustice to the woman in the eyes of Allah”. Essentially he is saying that women who dress in western clothes just had it coming to them and even rape and murder could be a part of God’s divine plan for justice. Such an evil conclusion could only come from believing in Islamic teaching about hell and heaven as described, and idolatry of Muhammed as a “perfect man” who had himself raped captives.
1
186
U.K. Muslims are 700% less likely to join the military than nonmuslims, with 6%-7% of U.K.’s citizens being Muslim(around 10% of residents, but that includes visas and illegals) but only 0.9% representation in the military.
U.K. rewarded Islam’s aversion to participation in nonmuslim militaries(considered apostasy by most Islamic scholars) by switching to Halal. Mind you, meat can only be halal if it is butchered by Muslims. Basically Muslims have taken over the U.K. militaries food supply, and defunded all nonmuslim food meat producers that used to supply the U.K. military. It’s an aggressive near monopoly of military meat contracts to Muslim-only meat producers. Muslims have taken control of U.K. military food supply.
Halal meat producers typically use around 2% of proceeds for mosque donations(unofficially required tithing, they can’t require it by law but it’s an expectation of Muslim companies especially halal foods). These funds are often used in U.K. to buy churches to convert to mosques. This isn’t some sort of alarmist exaggeration, it is literally just the circumstances and why Muslims push for halal even for food going to nonmuslims as halal has always been part of Islam’s conquest doctrines. It’s a way for Muslims to control a disproportionate amount of the food supply as nonmuslims literally cannot produce halal meat(bread and non-meat products for example can be certified halal without Muslims making it, though meat has to be slaughtered by a Muslim employee for it to be halal and most halal meat production is by Muslim owned companies.).
It’d be one thing for 1% of the U.K.’s military contracts for meat to be given to Halal meat producers, though they have chosen 100%. U.K. essentially is enabling one of the traditional Islamic means of conquest. If you study Muhammad’s life, the way he gained power before conquering what became Medina was by cattle theft and controlling the supply of livestock. In Muhammed’s time, this required violence targeting herdsmen tribes including beheading chiefs of those tribes.
That livestock was how muhammed was able to recruit more mercenaries to convert(especially back then as livestock was basically the exclusive commodity for marriage dowery, Muhammed was basically a leader of a livestock cartel that took over via large scale theft. That’s just factually what Muhammed did, his army stole thousands of camels and goats and sheep during his lifetime. Jesus didn’t steal anyone’s livestock, the only animal herding victim of Jesus was whoever owned the group of pigs that ran off a cliff after Jesus cast out a demon from a woman and it entered pigs. Other than that, Jesus didn’t gain power by messing with anyone’s animals. If you read the Sunnah, Muhammed’s authority over livestock included making rules such as not to sell animals for meat that men had had sex with. Which is an understandable rule, though just saying he was able to make rules about livestock because he gained control of the cattle during his violent conquests and kinda funny that was such a prevalent problem in Muhammed’s time that he had to appease people and promise no meat involved in beastiality would be sold).
Got a bit off topic, though just saying, U.K.’s government is making it easy for Muslims to gain power while simultaneously Muslims participate in their military at a 7x lower rate than the overall average of all other demographics combined. Making it easy for them.
Less than 0.9% of the British Army is Muslim. More Muslims went on to join ISIS than joined the British Army, yet the Islam simping UK government will now serve halal meat to the remaining 99.1% of the British Army.
1
52
Amr bin Maimun, a narrator of the Islamic Sunnah, participated in stoning a female monkey to death.
He claims to have witnessed some monkeys stoning a female monkey and he joined in on stoning the monkey.
How did he know that the monkey he stoned had committed sexual immorality? Not really sure, you’d have to watch a lot of monkey fornication to even be able to identify “illegal sexual intercourse”. Also kinda odd that it was a female monkey getting stoned since in the animal kingdom, often it makes that initiate the sexual intercourse. Guessing he means that monkey cheated on another monkey.
No one can know for sure. Though can be certain that if he actually did participate in stoning a monkey to death, it was definitely animal cruelty and the monkey didn’t understand why.
This Hadith is graded Sahih, which means “authentic” in Sunni Islam. Some famous Sunni Muslims include Mamdani and El-Sayed. And yes, the Islamic scholars do claim this is simply a historical event and a fact it occurred. Either one of the authors of Sunni Islam’s primary holy books stoned a monkey to death, or claimed to have stoned a monkey to death as that somehow is meaningful in their theology.
If you read enough of the Sunnah and Quran, it’s really sad as none of it is really that inspiring. I guys maybe makes a good campfire story for Muslims to tell or something, though not really that compelling as scripture.
43
Inbred Pakistani Muslims serving as police officers on the NYPD harassing a nurse whose is walking her dog.
Tal covered this story on his YouTube channel and has some good commentary youtu.be/breCBqRXF2g?is=ugw9…
These Islamic officers are baffled by the fact this woman can walk by herself and a dog at night time. They don’t name any law for why she is detained and questioned. Their only issue with her is that she is walking her dog at 3am. Obviously they as Muslim men just don’t like the fact this woman is allowed to be unaccompanied and be walking her dog under her own free will without having another reason to be doing it.
They don’t understand the basic concepts of America or freedom and should never have been allowed in this country, much less been allowed on the police force.
Two brazen muslim cops breaking the law in NYC. One officer puts his hands on a woman and threatens to wake away her dog. Neither cop can say what law she broke.
NEW YORK HAS NO IDEA WHAT THEY HAVE DONE BY ELECTING A MUSLIM as a mayor.
Communism at it’s finest.
1
180
U.K. is a joke.
It’s also a violation of Christian’s religious freedom too. Halal meet has to be slaughtered by Muslims for it to be Halal, and Halal meat processors typically have to donate like 2% to the mosques - and about 80% of mosques in U.K. are basically Muslim Brotherhood genre. Absolutely not compatible with Christianity to eat Halal meats as it funds Islam which is a religion based on denying who Jesus was.
Serving Halal to all recruits symbolizes that U.K. has fallen to Islam.
Whether it takes 60 years of 125 years, U.K. will be a majority Islamic country and have Islamic government. The math is more realistic for that outcome than people realize.
