Eels.pdf retweeted
You are Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, and it is January 18th 2023. You've prepared a speech announcing your intention to not run for re-election and clear the field for younger democrats. This image suddenly flashes in your head. Is it your moral duty to torpedo the 2024 campaign?
Eels.pdf retweeted
The scheming junior emperor declares his opposition to the senior Augustus over failed war in Persia. Classic gambit
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Eels.pdf retweeted
My Twitter feed right now is like if everyone I knew from American University started doing cocaine
Eels.pdf retweeted
Random failed resistlib candidate locking in and moving like prime LBJ
Semafor: Annie Andrews knew she was winning in October — but kept the poll secret
On Oct. 5, the Andrews campaign received a poll showing her with a 3-point lead over Graham. But the Democrat’s campaign decided against publicly releasing the poll — or any subsequent internal poll — showing Andrews with a lead over Graham, wary of drawing too much attention from national Republicans and jeopardizing a peak at the right time, according to Chas Goldman, a strategist for Andrews.
semafor.com/article/11/04/20…
Eels.pdf retweeted
Herrera had a pal volunteer to help his opponent, triumphantly revealed the scheme on election day, and then lost the race with a 23-point shift towards Democrats from 2024? I don't think I've ever seen anything like this before.
Oh yeah, one last thing.
One of the people we had inside the @katy4congress campaign might be someone you’d recognize…
Eels.pdf retweeted
54 seats and counting.
And I learned how to grill…these burgers and dogs are fully cooked.
Eels.pdf retweeted
I don’t have service for 10 hours. Wake up and check the mid terms results and see Texas went FULLY blue
Eels.pdf retweeted
millennial optimism is back baby i’m blasting florence and the machine bass boosted the dog days ARE over
Eels.pdf retweeted
ppl might say this is so cool and proletarian but if they did this in 2026 for like, Iran vets sorted by whether they used to work at Walmart of Amazon, we'd call it barbaric
Eels.pdf retweeted
If the remaining results go as expected, Democrats will hold governorships in states totaling 392 electoral votes.









































