Alicia ☮️ retweeted
Around 1500, Hieronymus Bosch painted sheet music on a sinner's bare butt in hell. 500 years later, someone transcribed and performed it. Now you can hear the original butt song from hell.
Alicia ☮️ retweeted
This looks like abuse of public funds.
A Vice-Chancellor earning over £500,000 claims expenses for his wife’s travel, including a “philanthropic engagement” in New York and a “spouse programme” in Switzerland
How is this acceptable? Is it not fraud?
thetimes.com/uk/education/ar…
Alicia ☮️ retweeted
If anyone would like to see a video of a short Halloween horror story, titled “Always Check your Slippers for Monsters!”, this is your lucky day.
#Caturday
Alicia ☮️ retweeted
Esther Ghey asking the obvious question of people who have become obsessed with trans people: "as a family we were willing to accept her so why when it's nothing to do with you are you so bothered?"
Alicia ☮️ retweeted
This is a good example of the way in which victims can often be sexually assaulted and left traumatised, bleeding, and in pain, without even realising the word for what happened to them is “rape”. It’s normal for victims to take a while to come to terms with what really happened
Alicia ☮️ retweeted
The best one
Just Eat apologises for AI food mistakes after social media ridicule bbc.in/4jAIj9J
Alicia ☮️ retweeted
The next time Nick Clegg in invited onto BBC to pontificate as an independent tech expert…please note that here he is, named in the $27bn New Mexico judgment as one of execs engaged in a systematic cover-up of Facebook’s deceptive consumer practices.
Alicia ☮️ retweeted
“I daresay in years to come we will look back on societal attitudes to mental ill-health, autism and ADHD with much the same shame.” - me for @zeteouk on the crisis of youth mental health, autism and adhd.
This is the most important piece I’ve written
zeteo.uk/p/there-is-no-snowf…
Alicia ☮️ retweeted
I've only just discovered the story of Jack Barth, the original creator of Yesterday, and Christ alive, it's one of the most grotesquely ironic stories I've ever encountered in the film industry.
For those unfamiliar with it, Barth was a struggling screenwriter who conceived an ingenious premise: a musician wakes up in a world where The Beatles never existed, realises he's the only person who remembers their songs, and starts passing them off as his own.
Barth wrote the screenplay, originally titled Cover Version. After decades of trying to break into the film industry, he finally sold it.
Enter Richard Curtis.
Curtis rewrote the screenplay, transforming Barth's rather melancholy examination of artistic failure into a crowd-pleasing romantic comedy. Curtis received sole screenplay credit, while Barth was left sharing a story by credit with the considerably more famous writer.
Now, Barth agreed to this arrangement. That's important. But what happened afterwards is what makes the whole business so bloody unpleasant.
Curtis subsequently described receiving little more than a one-sentence premise, despite Barth's original screenplay containing several remarkably specific elements that survived into the finished film, including the elderly John Lennon and the Harry Potter gag.
Barth has argued that his contribution was systematically minimised, leaving him struggling to convince people that he created the story in the first place.
And here's where the irony becomes so vicious that Kafka himself would probably have rejected it for being too fucking obvious.
In Barth's original version, the protagonist DOESN'T become enormously successful. He possesses the greatest collection of songs in popular music history and STILL struggles to make it.
It's a story about the cruel indifference of artistic success. About how creative talent and commercial recognition are frequently separated by circumstances beyond an artist's control.
Then Barth watches his own creation become an international hit, with another writer receiving the lion's share of the acclaim.
And now, six years after Barth publicly complained about the whole miserable business, Yesterday is becoming a West End musical.
Judging by his reaction today, the news appears to have come as something of a surprise to him.
Fucking hell.
I appreciate that contracts exist. I appreciate that Curtis substantially rewrote the film. I even appreciate that Barth received payment and agreed to the credits.
But there's something profoundly depressing about an industry that can take a struggling writer's original screenplay, turn it into a multimillion-pound success, and leave that writer feeling practically invisible.
And now the machinery is apparently gearing up to do it all over again, this time with jazz hands.
As for Richard Curtis, a gigantic FUCK YOU.
I wonder if these arrogant pigs will ever notify me that the story I created is becoming a huge West End musical.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5rm…








































