Pinned Tweet
Replying to @Arnisaeus
Wait - you’re telling me a culturally homogenous post-Christian society is fairly peaceful?
Interesting… Almost as if their previous Christian roots had some sort of effect
Elijah retweeted
Made a joke at the therapy office and they started writing it down. Mf steals my jokes everytime!
Elijah retweeted
“If I have to see one more person say, ‘Oh my gosh, operating margins or net profit margins in the S&P 500 are so extraordinary because we’re having a productivity boom,’ I will lose my mind.
We are not having a productivity boom. We are having an operating leverage boom. And that’s a very, very, very different thing, because one is sustainable and the other is cyclical.”
Cameron Dawson on why record S&P 500 profit margins may be telling investors something very different than they think
Elijah retweeted
I see I am being ritually insulted for my support of this man
The uneducated call me a racist
I am not a racist
I am a culturalist
I believe that some cultures are better than others
I prefer cultures to do not advocate stoning, pederasty,
wife beating, female genital mutilation, and beheading opponents
Call me old-fashioned...
Elijah retweeted
Every person living in a western nation needs to listen to every word of this
Katherine Berbalsingh went to the University of Oxford and is Headmaster at Michaela Community School in London, UK
She PERFECTLY explains the mass indoctrination into the narrative of oppressor and oppressed, and of hating White People
I will write only some of this out because it’s very important, however you should listen to it so you can hear the passion:
“The culture shift comes from what children learn at school and online. Ask any young person what history they learned at school, and they’ll tell you, Hitler. Ask them what else? Slavery. Ask them what else? American civil rights.
In fact, what little they know of history will be all about Black and brown people fighting for equality against the white man, women fighting men for the vote, gay and trans people fighting for various rights. Our young people have been taught that history is simply one long story about various groups struggling under the oppressive dead white man.
— History is taught through an oppressor lens. The triangular slave trade, white men held the power. What about Britain ending the slave trade? More than a quick mention, if at all? Mm, no.
What of the Arab slave trade that lasted 3 times as long as the triangular slave trade? Mm, no.
Okay, so GCSE history in Britain is often taught as migration through time, so the idea that Britain has always been a land of immigrants is embedded in our children’s heads. Most schools would prefer to concentrate learning about the tiny number of Black people who existed in Tudor England over a thorough analysis of England’s break from Rome.
— Not to mention weeks on King Mansa Musa of Mali because he was a Black Muslim. His bearing on British institutions, laws, and faith is nonexistent. And the fact that he is said to have been the richest man in history, thanks in part to his massive slave-owning society, is a detail somehow that teachers rarely ever teach.
But it isn’t just our schools. It’s our general culture too. Take your kids to a museum or an art gallery in any Western country, and you’ll find the same narrative.
As an example, when learning about aviation in London’s Science Museum and the extraordinary feat that is man making massive machines move in the sky, a write-up on the wall explains that women and Black people were historically barred from aviation schools and the military. Similarly, James Watt, the man who invented the steam engine and is considered the founder of the Industrial Revolution, has a write-up on the wall explaining that his early career involved slave trafficking, with a bonus analysis of the whole of Britain’s complicity in the slave trade.
They flatten the entire human story and all of its complexities into the narrative of oppressor and oppressed, leaving young people unable to see the world in any other terms.”
We have to end the mass indoctrination
This is literally what people described happening the Tech bubble. Average people YOLOing their savings into high risk stock gambling.
wsj.com/world/asia/stock-mar…
Elijah retweeted
Replying to @FreyChristopher
I don’t know why everyone is confused about this. Clearly Twain is America’s Homer.
Huckleberry Finn is literally called the American Odyssey.
Elijah retweeted
“If I profess, with the loudest voice and the clearest exposition, every portion of the truth of God except precisely that little point which the world and the devil are at that moment attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Christianity. Where the battle rages the loyalty of the soldier is proved; and to be steady on all the battle-field besides is mere flight and disgrace to him if he flinches at that one point.” --Elizabeth Rundle Charles
An example of Soros’ point that it doesn’t matter how many you get right or wrong, but how much you make when you are right and how much you lose when you are wrong (-3% total)
Elijah retweeted
“People always forget that 50% of a stock’s move is the overall market, 30% is the industry group, and then maybe 20% is the extra alpha from stock picking. And stock picking is full of macro bets. When an equity guy is playing airlines, he’s making an embedded macro call on oil.”
— Stanley Druckenmiller
Elijah retweeted
This is what I find quite unsettling about the liberal eisegetical method. It hyper focuses on deconstructing one word at a time in order to create the illusion of uncertainty.
The cool thing about Paul is that he gives analogy and reasoning to back teaching, so it clarifies beyond a doubt what exactly he means:
Ephesians 5:22-24
Wives and Husbands
[22] Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. [23] For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. [24] Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.
In other words, in order to deny the duty of submission of a wife to a husband you would deny the church’s submission to Christ.
Later in verse 33 this principle is reiterated with the summation that the duty of Man is Love to his wife, and the duty of Woman is Respect to her husband.
Elijah retweeted
Replying to @MBurtwrites @kyotoisreformed
You have a bit of secular thought, creeping into your view of Christianity Marissa.
The gospel is not a “live and let live“ message. Christian liberty does not extend to disobedience, which is fundamentally what liberalism is, since it places the cultural preferences of the reader above the authority of the text by inferring broad moral evolution.
It is actually perfectly reasonable to say that if a substance is sufficiently toxic, no one should consume it.























