For the HUNDREDTH time. It isn't evidence. Corrorobation strengthens the "ARGUMENT" that something was "MORE OR LESS" likely to have happened. Evidence is something that PROVES something happened.
Are you that thick you are unable to see this difference? Or just dishonest?
For those who were still attached. @johndavidhudson decided that instead of trying to discuss the issue he would block me. This is the typical conclusion of people who are caught out lying, being deceitful & engaging dishonestly. Back to the echo chamber
Replying to @CHSommers
@CHSommers Just watched @rgay on "The Morning Show". I thnk she spoke more in that show than she may have at the debate & certainly with a better attitude. May have had something to do with not being challenged at all on her comments or her beligerant fans. Funny that
Replying to @MarriedAU
@MarriedAU There we have it folks. UNDENIABLE proof of how much a fuckhead Mike truly is.
He is THE most toxic, self-centred, egotistical, narcissistic PRICK I have ever had the misfortune to see.
I am actually ashamed to share an X & Y chromosome with that CHILD
#mafs #mafsau
Jess is now OFFICIALLY a bigger CUNT than Ines. To hurt Ning & Mark just to cover up her lying, cheating despicable behaviour is lower than low.
A complete waste of fucking space. Her father should have STAYED gone!
#mafs #mafsau #marriedatfirstsightau
Just when you think Jess cannot become more of a slut:
au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/mafs-…
#mafs #mafsau #marriedatfirstsightau
And the funny thing about tribalism is that it is also the cause of in group / out group, racism, sexism, all forms of bigotry, xenophobia and practically every other form of "extreme" views.
So eliminating extremism wont solve the problem, as it is caused by tribalism
Incorrect. No longer selected for means that the trait itself does not increase the chance of SURVIVAL in order for reproduction to happen.
Oh I already have, I know EXACTLY what it says...
Clearly YOU know what it says as well which is why you are too gutless to actually recite it.
Since when has the police department been "paid guns for hire"? Its their job to protect the PUBLIC, not to interfere with people's freedom of speech, no matter how bad they are
a.msn.com/01/en-au/BBUyzCh?o…
Dont you remember her interview. Its everyone elses fault, they were mean to her & she was the poor victim.
And I am not sure why you are ridiculously clinging to a 6 month period of time in the middle of a huge revolution, with a govt that hadn't even got settled as an example of how democracies change rights all the time.
When you are ready, i am happy to explain in depth why this is the case. I hold no hope you will understand because you have shown that you srart with answers then try to force everything to fit. But i hope you genuinely try. At worst it would only reinforce your view right?
Bottom line is that humanity would not.even be here if it wasnt for meat eating, guaranteed, it is our nature & thus doesnt suddenly become a problem because YOU want to take the ignorant step of extending HUMAN morality to animals but only selectively.
And lastly, i dont go around screaming "murderer" (another human term for humans) to people who dont have the same view as me. You are being not only fractally wrong in doing that, but also bigoted, & in my mind far less moral than eating meat humanely.
So you talk about morality & i say it is more humane to farm animals woth their welfare in mind than it is to blindly slaughter them as collateral damage to crop growing. It is about US, not the animals. It is how we choose to behave in relation to animals.
How many birds, rodents, small mammals suffer horrendous pain & suffering in fields being poisoned to protect the crops, dying in ditches with farmers oblivious to the suffering they cause because they are too budy focusing on the crop, not the wildlife?
I am also concerned with the death of animals in crop growing. This is a far worse issue than animal farming as absolutely no care is given to those deaths, whereas animal g as rming places then welfare of animals as paramount (or should).
If you think only things that are "required" should be done, then you must not have condiments on your food, they arent "necessary". Yet you do, proving yourself wrong
It is not a "moral" issue eating meat, because morality is a HUMAN term for humans. It is a moral issue HOW we treat animals as this reflects on us as a species & i would condemn any mistreatment of animals as vehemently as any vegan. I just disagree with your def of "necessary"
