Does it explain the broad acceptance of IA from dev ? IA doesn't affect their status (yet?) as creating soft even with AI is still seen as complex, hard to manage, and require thought for long term manageability and integration to workflows
Lmao
We’re releasing a broad range of new mathematical results produced by an internal frontier model.
We’ve been consulting with the independent Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence at the Institute for Advanced Study, and we have drawn on their advice and public recommendations to inform how we release these results.
github.com/openai/math
I have mixed feeling about this. Definitely an ai enthusiast it looks like I am drawing my line there.
Introducing Griffin, the first model to pass the video Turing test.
48% of people who talked to it live thought it was a real human. Previous systems have had a pass rate <3%. It is #1 on NVIDIA's benchmark for full-duplex AI video.
It’s the first Human Interaction Model (HIM).
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The 48% figure and "video Turing test" claim are from Tavus's own study of 54 one-minute calls, not independently verified or using a standard protocol. Griffin-Lite leads NVIDIA's VideoFDB benchmark on their public leaderboard.
cellcog.ai/blog/tavus-gri…
research.nvidia.com/labs/amri/proj…
tech-ish.com/2026/10/02/tav…
ça commence...
old.reddit.com/r/typesafe_ai…
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?
I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev
• 20-200x faster
• 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free)
• Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions
AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution
Max retweeted
My favorite AI joke:
Current models are getting close to PhD-level intelligence. After that, they're expected to achieve the intelligence of someone who decided not to do a PhD.
J'aime cette théorie donc elle est vraie
Je résume (unpopular opinion) :
- Dario qui doit introduire Anthropic en bourse sur un marché à sec de liquidité émet l'idée de ralentir sur l'IA parce que Claude, il est trop fort et il va tuer la planète.
- Sam qui a le même problème que Dario se dit que c'est pas con parce que ça va finir par se voir que les centaines de milliards annoncés n'existent pas vraiment et qu'il faudra vite trouver autre chose pour refourguer sa dette.
- Elon qui doit diluer ses investisseurs sur des mois d'unlock de $SPCX saute sur l'occasion, comme ça Grok aura plus de temps pour Groker en orbite.
Bref avant d’imaginer qu’un Skynet s’est échappé du labo, je regarderais aussi les calendriers financiers des 3 gugus. Je ne prétends pas que leurs inquiétudes sont bidon. Je dis que sauver l’humanité et préserver ses intérêts financiers ne sont pas nécessairement deux activités incompatibles. Leur unanimité mérite qu’on regarde les deux.
Bring back Nicolo please 🥺
Scoop: Riot Games has had discussions with Kalshi and Polymarket over potential esports sponsorship deals, per sources. Full story: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Heu Gemini résume moi ce rapport
Anthropic’s Economics team is sharing a new model of how AI might affect economic growth, jobs, wages, and more by 2030.
Explore the scenarios, tell us what you think will happen, and see how your answers compare to more than 10,000 Americans. anthropic.com/institute/econ…
Max retweeted
AI is probably the biggest prisoner’s dilemma we’ve ever created. Everyone knows slowing down might be safer. But if OpenAI slows down and Anthropic doesn’t, OpenAI loses. If the US slows down and China doesn’t, the US loses. So nobody slows down.
That’s what makes this so insane. You don’t need some evil person trying to destroy the world. You just need a bunch of people making the rational decision for themselves over and over until collectively we’ve raced somewhere none of us actually wanted to go.
It’s a race to zero. Zero cost of intelligence. Zero time between thinking and doing. Maybe eventually zero need for us at all.
Ok Google comment effacer mon tweet précédent sur le retard de la France en robotique ?
Le prix du @pollenrobotics est HALLUCINANT, rien que les moteurs : des Dynamixel XL330-M288-T se trouvent à plus de 40€ pour un particulier.
Et il yen a 15 !
Pour un pro et un achat en masse on peut imaginer un prix 3 fois moins cher mais ensuite faut ajouter le Lidar, la CM Rockchip RJ3565 (20-30 balles !), la caméra, batteries, la R&D etc...
Sans un masdotonte comme @huggingface derrière le robot aurait été FACILEMENT 2 FOIS PLUS CHER (surtout conçu en 🇨🇵 le dernier robot fixe Ready de Pollen étant à 400 balles aussi en proposant 3x fois moins de DoF)
C'est là qu'on comprend qu'on doit continuer d'attirer en France ce genre de grosse boîte : on a bien une boîte US (HF) qui a racheté une boîte FR (Pollen Robotics) en 2025
