𝕱𝖆𝖈𝖙𝖋𝖗𝖆𝖒𝖊

Who will tell Chief Justice of India Surya Kant that no one is interested in "occupying" a site and sleep on the road "forever", especially when we live in such mehengai wale times? That circumstances created by the government and the inaction, or rather, aid and abetment of judiciary sometimes ultimately forces a large number of people to finally come out on the street to protest? That no one is interested in facing a brutal crackdown, despite knowing that the Court rarely comes to protesters' help or cracks the whip on government/police. And yet they do because that is the only way forward given that the government does not even bother to invite the protesters for a dialogue? Chief Justice Kant and his bench's remarks reflect an ivory-tower mindset, detached from all reality, zero recognition of people's class and caste struggles, a failure to wake up and smell the coffee, and which will definitely not go down well with the people. If you see so many people willing to come out and protest despite grave risks, then try to understand why they are doing so, rather than trying to shoot them down with all these questions, remarks, and arbitrary imposition of rules. How many questions did this Bench ask of the government about Gyanu and ECI fraud? Exactly. That tells you the entire story. To the government and state institutions I would say that if you don't want people to protest, then stop treating them like cockroaches and parasites and get the shit done for which you have been put in that position.