The Femcel Yearner 𐏂𐎮 𐎡𐎤𐎠𐎭𐎣

This "they aborted females because they hate women" excuse is stupid. Especially the China and India examples. Let's use actual facts. China never had an "only boys" policy. They had the *One Child Policy from 1979 to 2015* because they had over 900 million people and not enough food, jobs, or housing. The policy was one child. Not one boy. And here's the part y'all skip: *Widespread ultrasound didn't exist in China until the 1980s.* Before that, you couldn't even know the sex. You had one kid, boy or girl, and that was it. When ultrasound did spread, some families started choosing boys. Not because of some evil male conspiracy. Because of economics in a pre-industrial country. China in the 80s wasn't laptops and nursing jobs. It was farms, factories, and manual labor. No pensions. No social security for most rural families. Your old-age plan was your son. A son stayed. A daughter married out and belonged to her husband's family. If you only get ONE child, and you need someone to farm, do heavy labor, and take care of you when you're 70, you pick the one who stays. India is the same logic, plus dowry. In India, a daughter didn't just cost food. She cost a *dowry* - a payment the bride's family gives to the groom's family. The Dowry Prohibition Act was passed in 1961 and families still couldn't afford it. And after you pay it, she leaves. You are left alone with no one to farm, no one to earn, no one to care for you. A son is the opposite. He brings in dowry, he stays, he farms, he works, he cares for you. So poor families in both countries made a brutal, economic choice. Not a feminist hate crime. A survival choice under poverty, a one-child limit, no welfare state, and a patrilocal culture where sons stay and daughters leave. Stop rewriting history to make it sound like men sat in a room and said "let's kill women." They were trying not to starve and die alone at 70 with no one to help them. If you want to blame someone, blame poverty, blame the One Child Policy, blame the dowry system. Don't blame "men" for an economic system that crushed everybody.

This "they aborted females because they hate women" excuse is stupid. Especially the China and India examples. Let's use actual facts. China never had an "only boys" policy. They had the *One Child Policy from 1979 to 2015* because they had over 900 million people and not enough food, jobs, or housing. The policy was one child. Not one boy. And here's the part y'all skip: *Widespread ultrasound didn't exist in China until the 1980s.* Before that, you couldn't even know the sex. You had one kid, boy or girl, and that was it. When ultrasound did spread, some families started choosing boys. Not because of some evil male conspiracy. Because of economics in a pre-industrial country. China in the 80s wasn't laptops and nursing jobs. It was farms, factories, and manual labor. No pensions. No social security for most rural families. Your old-age plan was your son. A son stayed. A daughter married out and belonged to her husband's family. If you only get ONE child, and you need someone to farm, do heavy labor, and take care of you when you're 70, you pick the one who stays. India is the same logic, plus dowry. In India, a daughter didn't just cost food. She cost a *dowry* - a payment the bride's family gives to the groom's family. The Dowry Prohibition Act was passed in 1961 and families still couldn't afford it. And after you pay it, she leaves. You are left alone with no one to farm, no one to earn, no one to care for you. A son is the opposite. He brings in dowry, he stays, he farms, he works, he cares for you. So poor families in both countries made a brutal, economic choice. Not a feminist hate crime. A survival choice under poverty, a one-child limit, no welfare state, and a patrilocal culture where sons stay and daughters leave. Stop rewriting history to make it sound like men sat in a room and said "let's kill women." They were trying not to starve and die alone at 70 with no one to help them. If you want to blame someone, blame poverty, blame the One Child Policy, blame the dowry system. Don't blame "men" for an economic system that crushed everybody.

funny enough this way of thinking, "men's bodies are gross women's bodies are works of art," aligns with patriarchal heterosexual socialization

This is obviously horrible but why are women upset about this? I thought it was just a clump of cells?

Where does your IQ place you?

What we’re seeing with modern Black Americans is a fast-approaching ethnic extinction. Ignoring the bad economical state, black Americans may be undergoing the worst female-male schism. This probably was bound to happen though, given 70% of AA households are raised by single mothers (meaning most children are raised by a female POV) and a lot of these people eventually take online redpill & street gangs as spiritual guides. Black Americans brag about sleeping with white people (their racial oppressors lol) the same Indians brag about it online, maybe to even worse scales, main difference being Indian men control their women: black men don’t. (And Indians have their own country and a way higher TFR). In short they literally brag about diluting their DNA & turning into Pardo Brazilians. Hypothetically if all black americans mixed with all white americans, America would become 35% Biracial and 65% White. It’s kinda sad lol, most black men will grow up hating black women even more and viceversa. And this group is entirely bad at practicing endogamy which is crucial to preserve wealth. “Divestors” “sysbm”. Now pair this with Latin-American level of homocides & having the lowest TFR in the US, even below white people despite possessing far lower wealth!

Incredible

The hardest question for any woman, especially Christian woman, to answer is: Should a wife obey her husband? Near zero women give a yes or no answer. It's always conditional.

中国网络上充斥着赞美白女的言论，说她们多么淳朴，对感情多么真挚，如何不贪图金钱。结果X大翻译一来，全都暴露了，天下乌鸦一般黑。 我就说嘛，这女性主义本来就是源于西方的，后来才传到中国，你就算后来居上，也不至于跟发源地差别太大。“中华田园女权”之类错误观点该抛弃了，对白女的幻想该打破了。白种捞女也是捞女。 正视现实，旗帜鲜明地反对女性主义，不要想着区分什么真假女权。

Wоmеn using Darwinism as an excuse for destructive socio-sехuаl trends that benefit them obviously parallels industrial-era capitalists rationalizing the abhorrent conditions of workers while neither actually understands how Darwinian natural selection works.

Chuds are amazing. I suspect this is fake. If real, he’s emotionally unstable and probably a menace to society.

Yeah as I have learned more details I’ve shifted a bit from “this is crazy reckless of the mom” to “okay I actually get where she was coming from.” Is it ideal? No. But knowing her situation arresting her and handing the kids to their abusive dad seems nuts.

Agreed. They were tempted by the Jews who were transporting them, who knew they would be able to use it as blackmail later. They’ve known this for a long time. Not that it’s an excuse.

The side effects of being a cockslave. Maybe putting wires inside your uterus so a man can ejaculate his waste in you like a toilet isn't a good idea 🤔

understanding how NFP differs from contraception is an iq gate and I’m tired of pretending it isn’t

"If any one saith, that the marriage state is to be placed above the state of virginity, or of celibacy, and that it is not better and more blessed to remain in virginity, or in celibacy, than to be united in matrimony; let him be anathema." - Council of Trent 1563.

The sexual revolution is so obviously a failure that no one even tries to defend it on its own merits anymore, they only seek to imply it did not happen and is not happening and men collectively and simultaneously decided to change our behaviour for no reason