Challenging misinformation from Mid East conflict in Church & other sources. Occasional forays into other topics are my views only! I don’t do lists.
East Midlands, UK
Joined February 2011
- Tweets112K
- Following2.5K
- Followers2.1K
- Likes101K
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
Question your child’s new gender identity, and you could be investigated. Bonkers? Well, that's Labour’s conversion bill
Here’s why it must be stopped.
righttimes.substack.com/p/wh…
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
“Six million people were killed in concentration camps during the Second World War, as well as millions of others because they were Polish, disabled, gay, or belonged to another ethnic group.”
Jews. The word you’re looking for is ‘Jews’, not ‘people’. This truly beggars belief.
This dire reporting is not only factually incorrect but erases Jews from a genocide in which six million Jewish men, women and children were slaughtered specifically because they were Jews.
How is it possible, therefore, that on Holocaust Memorial Day of all days, @GMB manages to acknowledge several other groups but not Jews?
To make matters worse, there is no reference to Jewish people at all for over two minutes into this segment, and when there finally is one, it is only done once and in regard to former history students taking a tour of the Jewish quarter of Kraków.
Additionally, there is bafflingly no utterance of the word “antisemitism” whatsoever.
If this is intended to pay respect to the victims of Holocaust Memorial Day, it has failed abysmally and ignores the true nature of this horrific event.
How on earth was this allowed to happen, @ITV? We demand an explanation.
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
The Church of England just warned Labour’s ‘conversion ban’ risks criminalising prayer. The same bill lets parents face jail for asking if their gay kid is actually gay. Make it make sense.
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
Death threats have been sent to the Darlington nurses - with pictures of large knives.
They had to be escorted by police to their cars.
They had to stay away from work.
Police only investigated after being contacted by the media.
This is trans terrorism.
And it needs to STOP.
Police investigate threat to 'murder whoever doesn't support trans rights' sent to nurses at centre of hospital changing room case trib.al/fkGDjGi
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
Our full report is here, including a complete copy of the injunction (minus the Confidential Schedule) and three appeal documents.
taxpolicy.org.uk/2026/11/07/…
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
And for the judiciary: how could a judge grant such an order against an unrepresented defendant, without a trial, without determining whether her allegations were true and without, it seems, any assessment of proportionality?
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
The Free Speech Union exposed that all five members of the Working Group tasked with drafting the official definition of Islamophobia had troubling links to Islamist organisations, including the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND.
The Working Group held a consultation so people could help shape what became the “anti-Muslim hostility” definition. Given the public interest, the FSU asked which groups and individuals had been consulted.
Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy submitted a Freedom of Information request. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) replied that it had deleted all the responses — in what appears to be against the Government’s own data policy.
The FSU then threatened Angela Rayner’s department with legal action.
Now the department’s most senior civil servant says the responses do exist and remain on its data system, but the department will not disclose who was consulted.
So what is going on? Were we told the responses had been deleted to conceal the fact that Islamist extremists had the chance to influence the definition?
We are now told that an Islamophobia tsar will be announced imminently. Given Rayner and her department’s record, who on earth could it be?
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
We're told that schools need to get 14-15 year-olds ready to vote at 16. Has the government thought through the problem of teachers who are political activists canvassing pupils for votes? And what about the obvious contradiction in expecting pupils to independently research who to vote for and the government's social media bans for teens? At the end, I responded to the minister telling me not to worry as 16 year olds will be allowed to get info from TRUSTED sources. Trusted by who? If this is a big expansion of democracy, why is there no impact assessment or proper engagement with criticism?
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
JUST IN: In a Muslim Brotherhood-style election fraud incident, a poll worker in Dearborn, Michigan, speaking in Arabic, tells an undercover reporter that he can vote in a U.S. Senate election despite saying he is not a U.S. citizen.
“Only for U.S. President can’t you vote, but for the others, you can.”
Under 18 U.S.C. § 611, noncitizens are prohibited from voting in federal elections, including U.S. Senate races, subject to narrow exceptions.
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
Thank you to James O’Brien @mrjamesob for the free advertisement on LBC this morning.
The Free Speech Union was founded by Toby Young in 2020, two years after his own cancellation. In 2018, shortly after he was appointed to the board of the Office for Students on the strength of his work in education, the offence archaeologists launched a campaign against him. He was forced to resign from five posts, losing half his income and much of his reputation. He wished there had been an organisation he could turn to for help.
The FSU now has more than 50,000 members and has taken on more than 7,000 cases in six years. We receive between 40 and 70 new requests for help every week, and we have saved countless people from losing their jobs, their university places or their liberty simply for exercising their lawful right to free speech.
Often, the process is the punishment — we offer mental health support to our members who need it. The prospect of losing your job and livelihood over something you said can be extremely distressing. You can read the first report ever published on the mental health effects of cancellation by Carole Sherwood and Andrew MacLeod with a forward from Lord Young below.
It was in recognition of Toby’s work defending free speech that Kemi Badenoch nominated him for a peerage. That means the FSU can now do more than ever to protect free speech in Britain, at a time when it is under attack from all sides.
More than 60,000 people were arrested for “communications offences” between 2021 and 2025, a @BigBrotherWatch report found.
If the police turn up at your door and haul you into a cell for hours over something you’ve said online — as they did to Maxie Allen (@MaxieAllen) and Rosalind Levine — an FSU membership will be the best money you ever spend. We provided their lawyers, covered their legal fees and secured £20,000 in compensation and an admission of wrongful arrest from Hertfordshire Police.
Join today. You never know when you might need us!👇
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
You've avoided nearly all of my questions, Norah, because you're literally incapable of answering them. Your mind is firmly closed to any evidence or facts that undermine your preferred narrative. You consider it immoral for anyone to even question you, even though you voluntarily and confidently entered this discussion. You're like a flat-earther. Nothing I or anyone else says to you will permeate your stubborn quasi-religious beliefs, because to change your mind would take away a core part of your self image, which is as somebody who is kinder and better and more righteous than the nasty people still advocating for the safety of women and girls.
You repeat your thought-terminating clichés and unevidenced assertions, which I assume sound clever inside your echo chamber, but which, outside it, make you appear not only dim, but a total moral vacuum. Increased risk to females? Who cares. Women threatened by violence? Of course those poor trans-identified men lash out when they meet resistance! What is a gender identity? You can't really say, but like the flat-earther, you're sure it exists, because your tribe is held together by belief in it, and pride themselves on their blind faith in it.
I keep waiting for a single gender ideologue or trans activist to truly engage with the facts, but all of you sheer away from them like horses from fireworks. It truly is like talking to cult members who're incapable of engaging in rational debate and just keep chanting the mantras, consigning all serious questions to the 'evil' bin.
I've been told I'm on the wrong side of history thousands of times. By debating people like you, I've come to realise that your ilk's idea of the 'right side of history' means stripping women and girls' of their rights, excusing male violence against women, siding with those issuing death and rape threats and attempting to suppress critical thought and freedom of speech.
Maybe, like the flat-earthers, you genuinely think history will vindicate you. I believe people will look back on this period and analyse your arguments, not because they admire them, but because they're trying to fathom how so many supposedly intelligent people fell, hook, line and sinker for a bunch of vacuous, post-modern, pseudo-intellectual cobblers, while being completely indifferent to the real world harm they were enabling.
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
Many congratulations to Baroness Foster of Oxton DBE @jfoster2019 who yesterday in the House of Lords accused the British Labour government of appeasing Israel's enemies over the sanctions imposed.
The Conservative peer said ministers were punishing an ally that provides Britain with intelligence and NHS medicines, while Jewish children and families face rising antisemitism.
Peers backed the motion that criticised the sanctions against Israel 94–90, but the regulations were still approved.
I could have written her speech myself using the exact same words, but I’m glad she chose the words and that many in the House agreed with them. 👏 👏
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
“I have no shame against your terrorists and your rapists” drove these aggressive men mad. They were SNARLING mad.
#SheffieldTownHall
#AntiZionismIsFascism
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
*sigh* because the British press hasn’t spelt this out I will. (Is it spelled or spelt?)
Anyway … The EU believes its law takes precedence over Poland’s sovereign law (even its Constitution, wherever EU law applies)
Poland’s Constitution says it is the SUPREME law of the country (I agree)
Now Donald Tusk’s is battling his own people over control of Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal, with police on the streets and the court’s leadership removed (because they disagreed with the EU’s position).
the European Commission is, of course, backing Tusk on the appointment of judges. ( as long as they agree with the EU position)
Brussels insists the Tribunal must respect rulings of the EU Court of Justice (because they believe their rule is superior to sovereignty)
AND They dare to call this “defending the rule of law”
And THIS ladies and gentlemen is why I voted to leave. You’re welcome 🔥
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
Andy Burnham has met Muslim community leaders in Downing Street and accused his political rivals of using “unacceptable” language when discussing Islam.
This is not the first time senior Labour politicians have accused their political opponents of crossing the line when discussing Islam, its history and its practices.
Labour MPs have repeatedly branded opposition politicians who criticise Islam “Islamophobic”. Earlier this year, 26 Labour MPs reported Reform UK to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) over its comments about Islam.
Labour MPs also reported the Conservative Shadow Justice Secretary, Nick Timothy, to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and accused him of being “Islamophobic”. He even faced calls for his sacking from the then Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, after criticising a mass Muslim prayer event in Trafalgar Square.
In a free country where blasphemy laws were abolished 18 years ago, politicians and private citizens must be free to criticise, question and debate any religion — including Islam.
But that was not the only revelation to emerge from the Downing Street meeting.
It has been reported that Angela Rayner told Muslim community leaders she was preparing to announce the appointment of an “anti-Muslim hostility” tsar.
Given that Rayner appointed five individuals to the Working Group tasked with drafting the “anti-Muslim hostility” definition, all of whom had troubling links to Islamist organisations, and that her department falsely claimed to have deleted all responses to its consultation on the definition, who on earth will she appoint?
Read more from FSU Campaigns Officer @MaxHThompson 👇
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
This is extraordinary - the lawyer representing Palestine Action admitted in court today that the group doesn’t condemn the sledgehammer attack that fractured a female police officer's spine.
(((Fran at AFI))) #IAmaProudZionist retweeted
Dear non Jews, I apologise for the dregs of my community who try and argue FOR Jew hate.
They have internalised antisemitism and enjoy the applause it wins them when they scream, ‘I am the good Jew, not like the other Jews.’
Polanski is a charlatan who wrongly claimed his family were Holocaust survivors, and whose other untruths are famous.
All I can say is sorry.
