Future Children is a music & film project by CC Sheehan (Celebrity Pilots, GBV, Doug Gillard) & Kevin Coral (Witch Hazel Sound). “2 bedroom Silver Surfers...”

Kent, OH
Joined October 2015
Future Children retweeted
Valerie and Her Week of Wonders :: (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) aquariumdrunkard.com/2026/10… This Halloween when the usual horror soundtrack fare begins to feel a little too familiar, there's 1970's 'Valerie and Her Week of Wonders' - Jaromil Jireš’s surreal Czech fairy tale
3
11
1,155
Future Children retweeted
Donnie Iris. A Pittsburgh legend. 🖤💛 May he rest in peace.
19
194
9
1,666
37,999
Future Children retweeted
The most deranged chud I know had his wife leave him and made an AI Christian neo soul/country band where he maintains instagrams for each of its 7 members
15
16
6
701
45,188
The @FilmsRadiance blu-ray is marvelous for this release.
Black Tight Killers 俺にさわると危ないぜ [1966] Directed By: Yasuharu Hasebe "After drinking with her at a Tokyo bar, he becomes involved in saving Yuriko from assassination by stylish, female ninjas"
7
68
2,070
Future Children retweeted
Motown group The Four Tops performing “Standing in the Shadows of Love” in 1967. The song was considered a reworking of the 1963 Suoremes’ 1963 B-Side “Standing at the Crossroads of Love”. It reached #2 on the U.S. R&B chart. On the album Reach Out. m.youtube.com/watch?v=r80i5r…
1
11
482
Future Children retweeted
That story about Google killing hundreds of thousands of trees in Finland for its data center project is such a perfect microcosm of what capitalism is doing to our world. Recent mass media headlines are saying the tech giant "illegally" cut down "250,000" trees, but both claims paint an inaccurate picture of what actually happened. Google killed 400,000 trees (250,000 near a town called Muhos and another 150,000 near the village of Otanmäki), and unless the company's executives actually wind up going to prison for this, their actions cannot properly be described as "illegal". I don't know who first coined the saying "If the penalty is a fine, then it's legal for rich people," but it certainly applies here. The Finnish Licensing and Supervision Authority has reportedly ordered Google to suspend all “measures that significantly change the environment," saying it will "consider enforcement proceedings and fines" if the megacorporation does not comply. Google's parent company Alphabet has a net worth of around four trillion dollars. Whatever paltry penalties Finland might impose for these ecocidal actions, it won't have any meaningful effect on Google. Giant corporations do this shit all the time. They calculate that the fines incurred by their abusive actions will be dwarfed by the massive profits they generate, issue fake apologies as needed, and leave it to their armies of lawyers to minimize the damage. That's why the Sackler family is still worth billions despite all the fines Purdue Pharma was slapped with while creating the US opiate epidemic. A 2017 Harvard study titled “The Opioid Epidemic: Fixing a Broken Pharmaceutical Market" contains the following paragraph: "Although civil claims and criminal charges were brought against Purdue and its executives, the resulting penalties paled in comparison to extended-release oxycodone profits. In May 2007, the company and its president, chief counsel, and former chief medical officer pled guilty to falsely marketing extended-release oxycodone as 'less addictive, less subject to abuse and diversion, and less likely to cause tolerance and withdrawal than other pain medications.' As part of the plea bargain, Purdue agreed to pay the federal government $600 million and 27 states $20 million. The three executives agreed to $34.5 million in fines but avoided jailtime. By contrast, Purdue has earned an estimated $31 billion in total revenues from extended-release oxycodone since its launch. Rather than deterring fraudulent marketing, the penalties simply became a cost of doing business." A cost of doing business. That's how things work under capitalism. The law primarily exists not to protect people or the environment, but to protect the interests of capital. If you destroyed a Google data center you'd probably be charged as a terrorist and spend decades in prison, but Google can destroy the natural world around you and get off with a finger wag and a symbolic fine. If you stole millions of dollars from your employer you'd go to prison for grand larceny, but if your employer steals millions from its employees you need to win a class action lawsuit to get back what they stole from you. Proponents of capitalism often pretend they support minimal government intervention in civilian affairs, but their entire model is at all times propped up by state power using force to protect the haves from the have-nots at every level of our society. Corporations are free to destroy the environment, destroy your health, rob you, exploit you, and manipulate your government to their advantage, and if you ever take action to stand up to this world-devouring onslaught, the state will lock you in a cage. In school we are taught that that the law exists to protect ordinary people from bad people, but that's not true at all. Under capitalism, the law exists to protect the very worst among us from everyone else. That's why we are seeing our planet being turned into dust and ashes for no reason other than shareholder profit. It's an insane system, and it needs to end. These freaks are feeding our entire biosphere into the woodchipper.
23
78
2,458
Future Children retweeted
That story about Google killing hundreds of thousands of trees in Finland for its data center project is such a perfect microcosm of what capitalism is doing to our world. Recent mass media headlines are saying the tech giant "illegally" cut down "250,000" trees, but both claims paint an inaccurate picture of what actually happened. Google killed 400,000 trees (250,000 near a town called Muhos and another 150,000 near the village of Otanmäki), and unless the company's executives actually wind up going to prison for this, their actions cannot properly be described as "illegal". I don't know who first coined the saying "If the penalty is a fine, then it's legal for rich people," but it certainly applies here. The Finnish Licensing and Supervision Authority has reportedly ordered Google to suspend all “measures that significantly change the environment," saying it will "consider enforcement proceedings and fines" if the megacorporation does not comply. Google's parent company Alphabet has a net worth of around four trillion dollars. Whatever paltry penalties Finland might impose for these ecocidal actions, it won't have any meaningful effect on Google. Giant corporations do this shit all the time. They calculate that the fines incurred by their abusive actions will be dwarfed by the massive profits they generate, issue fake apologies as needed, and leave it to their armies of lawyers to minimize the damage. That's why the Sackler family is still worth billions despite all the fines Purdue Pharma was slapped with while creating the US opiate epidemic. A 2017 Harvard study titled “The Opioid Epidemic: Fixing a Broken Pharmaceutical Market" contains the following paragraph: "Although civil claims and criminal charges were brought against Purdue and its executives, the resulting penalties paled in comparison to extended-release oxycodone profits. In May 2007, the company and its president, chief counsel, and former chief medical officer pled guilty to falsely marketing extended-release oxycodone as 'less addictive, less subject to abuse and diversion, and less likely to cause tolerance and withdrawal than other pain medications.' As part of the plea bargain, Purdue agreed to pay the federal government $600 million and 27 states $20 million. The three executives agreed to $34.5 million in fines but avoided jailtime. By contrast, Purdue has earned an estimated $31 billion in total revenues from extended-release oxycodone since its launch. Rather than deterring fraudulent marketing, the penalties simply became a cost of doing business." A cost of doing business. That's how things work under capitalism. The law primarily exists not to protect people or the environment, but to protect the interests of capital. If you destroyed a Google data center you'd probably be charged as a terrorist and spend decades in prison, but Google can destroy the natural world around you and get off with a finger wag and a symbolic fine. If you stole millions of dollars from your employer you'd go to prison for grand larceny, but if your employer steals millions from its employees you need to win a class action lawsuit to get back what they stole from you. Proponents of capitalism often pretend they support minimal government intervention in civilian affairs, but their entire model is at all times propped up by state power using force to protect the haves from the have-nots at every level of our society. Corporations are free to destroy the environment, destroy your health, rob you, exploit you, and manipulate your government to their advantage, and if you ever take action to stand up to this world-devouring onslaught, the state will lock you in a cage. In school we are taught that that the law exists to protect ordinary people from bad people, but that's not true at all. Under capitalism, the law exists to protect the very worst among us from everyone else. That's why we are seeing our planet being turned into dust and ashes for no reason other than shareholder profit. It's an insane system, and it needs to end. These freaks are feeding our entire biosphere into the woodchipper.
57
1,031
61
2,459
35,032
Future Children retweeted
RIP to a true Pittsburgh LEGEND I’m sure @donnieiris is rockin’ on the other side. youtu.be/YH5Arbm47IQ?is=KYyi…
1
1
1
65
Future Children retweeted
I have just published a piece that is very important to me. It's about why so many "progressives" and people on "the left" are lying to us right now about crime, safety, and repression, and what we should be doing instead. equalityalec.substack.com/p/…
19
237
26
1,018
81,519
Future Children retweeted
Holy shit. Dutch intelligence has uncovered Jared Kushner’s role as a Mossad agent.
2,779
30,812
2,070
151,926
6,831,173
Future Children retweeted
Fox News is putting Nicki Minaj up telling people to vote red. Let’s break that down. Can Nicki Minaj vote? No. She’s not a U.S. citizen. Can Nicki Minaj’s husband vote? No, he’s a registered sex offender. Can Nicki Minaj’s brother vote? No, he’s serving 25 years to life for child sexual assault. She seems like the perfect spokesperson for MAGA republicans.
814
18,702
553
85,760
2,031,595
Future Children retweeted
Scene from Portishead's "To Kill a Dead Man" (1994),an 11-minute, black and white short film co-written, scored, and starred in by the band.
2
4
293
Future Children retweeted
This euphoric ass piece of music is ducked off in the middle of the last song on the last Parliament album of the last year in the 70’s. Shit sounds nothing like them. Junie brought real life vibes to audio form. You can imagine a lot with this section.
4
77
6
643
13,399
Replying to @QuaeroBooks
Reminds me of coming across a conversation between "recording engineer" Steve Albini and Devo's Gerald Casale talking about Reagan's politics.
6
7
743
Future Children retweeted
Leonard Cohen: "Art is the evidence of a life." . Link in bio 🔗
2
3
520
Future Children retweeted
YOU'RE BORN. YOU SEE PANTS STYLES GO FROM BAGGY TO SKINNY BACK TO BAGGY EVERY 10 YEARS FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. YOU DIE. THE END
315
25,092
553
303,467
3,924,753
Future Children retweeted
... fourth world @FutureChldrn I Heart Noise @mantris59918733 Hi Scores ian hawgood, whitelabrecs Neglect, Neglectsound Eje Eje @batovrecords Akira Film Script, Ethereal Projector, Ambient Cat Sandman Project Black Sun High Desert Episode Page: trevor.se/2026/10/25/trevs-v… ...
1
1
1
39
Future Children retweeted
13
107
13
990
25,834
Future Children retweeted
If I went to Cane’s and Kirk and his fuckass dog were behind the counter I’d citizens arrest them until the health inspector showed up
4
9
158
5,043