𝗔𝗹𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 | 𝗚𝗚

Understanding the Basics of Asset Management on LIBER App: What It Means to Deposit, Mint or Withdraw Imagine you are opening a crypto app for the first time. You want to know what happens to your money, what you receive, and what your options are. That is the experience I wanted to walk through after reading about @liberappx and exploring the official manual. The First Step Is Access You start by clicking Connect at the top of the LIBER App and choosing either Google sign-in or MetaMask. Once you approve the request, the header changes to Connected, and your Dashboard opens up with your Portfolio Estimate, Profile, Habitat and Referral panels. If a page seems locked, the manual simply tells you to check your account connection first. Then Comes the Deposit On the Deposit page you put in your USDT amount. The platform allows a minimum of 10 USDT and a maximum of 100,000 USDT, and it shows a preview of your NFT denominations before you confirm. This small detail matters because it lets you see what you are about to receive instead of guessing. What You Receive Is a Position, Not Just a Receipt After your deposit is confirmed, the app issues a LIBER DISK NFT that represents your position. This is the center of the whole experience. Your LIBER DISK is where you review your position status, reference value, rewards, Habitat benefits and eligibility, along with your Mint LIB and Withdraw options. The Real Power Is in the Choice LIBER App does not push you down a single road. Depending on your position status and protocol conditions, you can choose to Mint LIB, Withdraw, or use other supported actions. That is the idea behind the line one deposit, one position, multiple paths, and it is what makes the platform feel organized for a beginner. What I Would Tell a Friend Take your time. Read the App Manual, start with an amount you are comfortable with, and check your position status before you decide anything. Keep your private key and seed phrase to yourself, and trust only official channels like @liberappx. Closing Thought Basic asset management is really about clarity. Know how you get in, know what you hold, and know how you move forward. LIBER App lays all three out in a simple flow, and that is a good place to begin. #ad #LiberAppAmbassador

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝗼𝗿𝘀, 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁. @BAI_AGI is building all three: ➜ 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝗼𝗿𝘀: many models, one API ➜ 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆: x402 ➜ 𝗩𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁: 8004 Learn more: b.ai/ 𝗗𝗼𝗼𝗿𝘀, 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆, 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮 𝘁𝗮𝗽. @BAI_AGI makes it simple: ➜ 𝗧𝘂𝗿𝗻 𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝗻 with one API ➜ 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗲 from 70+ models ➜ 𝗣𝗮𝘆 only for what flows Open the tap: b.ai/ 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗽. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗔𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗔𝗜 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁? 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗕.𝗔𝗜. @BAI_AGI offers an OpenAI-compatible API. Switching is: ➜ 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗨𝗥𝗟 ➜ 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗸𝗲𝘆 ➜ 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲 Try it: b.ai/ 𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺. @BAI_AGI respects your: ➜ 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲: 70+ models ➜ 𝗕𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲𝘁: Flash models and discounts ➜ 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗺: leave a model anytime See why: b.ai/ 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗴𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗮𝗱𝗱𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀. 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘁. @BAI_AGI is building for that world: ➜ 𝗪𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘀 for agents ➜ 𝗣𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 between agents ➜ 𝗜𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆 for agents Learn more: b.ai/ 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘁. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗕.𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵: 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀, 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗴𝗲. @BAI_AGI offers: ➜ 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀: 70+ in one API ➜ 𝗠𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆: payments for people and agents ➜ 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀: BAIclaw, BAIcode and Skills Share this: b.ai/ 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀, 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆, 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲. Connect to @BAI_AGI once and reach 70+ models. ➜ 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 ➜ 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀 ➜ 𝗡𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 later Start: b.ai/ 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗡𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗹, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁. 𝗜'𝘃𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗮 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗽 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗹. In theatre, the dress rehearsal is the full performance in costume, with lights and sound, but without the paying audience. It's where the actors discover that a door sticks, a prop is missing or a cue comes in late. Better to find that out in front of empty seats. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗻𝗲𝘁 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗪𝗜𝗡𝗸𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆. Test deployments for the services are published in the documentation, and test TRX and WIN come from the Nile faucet. Here's what I'd rehearse before opening night: ➜ 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗰𝘂𝗲: each oracle request and its callback ➜ 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲: decimals and data formats ➜ 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽: funding balances for requests and upkeeps ➜ 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁: what happens when something goes wrong A rehearsal also builds the team's confidence. People who've run through the whole show calmly are much less likely to panic if something goes wrong in front of an audience. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗹, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗲. That's true of software too. Users don't know how many times a contract was tested on Nile. They simply experience an app that works when it matters. I'd treat testnet time as part of the product, not as a delay before it. The documentation lists the Nile contracts you'll need: doc.winklink.org/v2/doc/ 𝗥𝗲𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝗻𝗲. @justinsuntron @WinkLink_Oracle #TronEcoStar

𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗡 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗜 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗱. @BAI_AGI brings: ➜ 𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗡 𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 ➜ 𝗪𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗻 ➜ 𝘅𝟰𝟬𝟮 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 Learn more: cointelegraph.com/press-rele… 𝗠𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗡 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗔 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗻𝗼 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗱𝗿𝗮𝘄𝗲𝗿. The JUST Grants DAO exists so builders in the ecosystem have a path to support. I like that it is public and open to read. What stands out to me: ➜ 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 get a route to apply ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆 can see how it works ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 grows from the ground up The official page is here: just.network/grantsdao 𝗕𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴. @justinsuntron @DeFi_JUST #TronEcoStar

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁. @BAI_AGI helps you: ➜ 𝗦𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀 instantly ➜ 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀 in one place ➜ 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗽 the best one Start testing: chat.b.ai/chat 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁, 𝘄𝗶𝗻 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗠𝘆 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹. Most losses in crypto start with a lookalike website, not a hack of the chain. So I save the real links once and only ever use those. My habit: ➜ 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸 each official site from a trusted source ➜ 𝗜𝗴𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗲 links from strangers and surprise DMs ➜ 𝗡𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 a seed phrase, with anyone The official support page is here: support.just.network/ 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘁. @justinsuntron @DeFi_JUST #TronEcoStar

𝗩𝗥𝗙 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗹 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗪𝗜𝗡𝗸𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸'𝘀 𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗺𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗸. 𝗥𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁. The moment a contract asks for a random value. Everything that affects the outcome, such as entries in a raffle, should be locked before this point. 𝗦𝗲𝗲𝗱. An input used in generating the random value. It helps make each request unique, so results can't simply be replayed. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳. The cryptographic evidence that comes with the random value. It shows the value was produced correctly and wasn't chosen after the fact. 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁. The moment the value and proof arrive back at the contract, which verifies the proof before using the number. If verification fails, the value isn't accepted. Here's how the four connect: ➜ 𝗥𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁 opens the process ➜ 𝗦𝗲𝗲𝗱 makes it unique ➜ 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳 makes it checkable ➜ 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 makes it usable Once these words feel natural, VRF stops seeming like magic. You can read a game's contract and follow exactly where its randomness comes from and when it was used. It becomes a clear, auditable process that games, NFT reveals and raffles can rely on. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗵𝘀, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁. That part sits with the builder, and the Nile testnet is the right place to practise it. The VRF guide walks through each stage with examples: doc.winklink.org/v2/doc/vrf.… 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀, 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲. @justinsuntron @WinkLink_Oracle #TronEcoStar

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁. @BAI_AGI takes care of: ➜ 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 ➜ 𝗨𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 ➜ 𝗣𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 Start: b.ai/ 𝗦𝗸𝗶𝗽 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗶𝗻𝗴. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗥𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱. JST is the token behind JUST, and its design is what interests me. It is tied to how the ecosystem earns and how that value is used. What I keep in mind: ➜ 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 flow back into the ecosystem ➜ 𝗕𝘂𝘆𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘂𝗿𝗻 is part of the story ➜ 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀 explain it better than rumours do The official page is here: just.network/ 𝗨𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻. @justinsuntron @DeFi_JUST #TronEcoStar

𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗲𝘁 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗪𝗜𝗡𝗸𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸, 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲. 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁. I've written a lot about oracles, burns and TRON. So here's the condensed version I'd hand to anyone starting out. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀: ➜ 𝗔𝗻 𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 that brings outside data and verifiable inputs to TRON contracts 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝘀: ➜ 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲 for market data, from seven independent nodes per feed ➜ 𝗩𝗥𝗙 for randomness with on-chain proofs ➜ 𝗔𝗻𝘆𝗔𝗣𝗜 for custom external data ➜ 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 for triggers checked every 3 seconds 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗿𝗻 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀: ➜ 𝟭𝟬𝟬% of oracle service revenue goes to quarterly WIN buybacks ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗪𝗜𝗡 is sent to the TRON black hole address ➜ 𝗘𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱'𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝘇𝗲 depends on revenue and the market price at execution 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱: ➜ 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝟭: 67,357,364,510 WIN, about 6.74% of initial supply, $3,590,256.63 at execution 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲: ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗻𝗲𝘁, with published test deployments 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗳𝘆: ➜ 𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗡, the official docs and the program page That's the whole picture in a few lines. Holders can use it to read burn records sensibly. Builders can use it to choose the right service and rehearse properly. 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲. The buyback page and the docs are the best places to go deeper. The program page is where I'd start: winklink.org/#/win-buyback-b… 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗶𝘁 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲, 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲. @justinsuntron @WinkLink_Oracle #TronEcoStar

𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲. @BAI_AGI offers tiered pricing with up to 90% off, plus deals on new launches. Use the savings to: ➜ 𝗧𝗿𝘆 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀 ➜ 𝗥𝘂𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀 ➜ 𝗜𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 Read more: cointelegraph.com/press-rele… 𝗕𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀, 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀. @justinsuntron @BAI_AGI #TronEcoStar

𝗜𝗳 𝗜 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝟭 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝘀𝘂𝗹𝗲, 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜'𝗱 𝗽𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲. 𝗢𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝘁. Time capsules are a good discipline. You can't include opinions that will date badly, or predictions that might look silly later. You include what's permanent. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝗺𝘆 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝘀𝘂𝗹𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗪𝗜𝗡 𝗯𝘂𝘆𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘂𝗿𝗻: ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆: 67,357,364,510 WIN ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲: about 6.74% of WIN's initial supply ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: $3,590,256.63, labelled as a snapshot ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴: WINkLink oracle service revenue ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲: TRON's black hole address, beyond anyone's reach ➜ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝘂𝗹𝗲: all oracle service revenue goes to quarterly buybacks Everything in that capsule can be checked against the chain or the official program page. Whoever opens it, years from now, will find it as accurate as the day it was sealed. What I've left out matters too. There's no forecast for later rounds, because round sizes depend on revenue and market price at execution. There's no commentary about price, because a burn is a supply event, not a signal. 𝗔 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗜 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗱. I'd recommend this exercise to anyone writing about crypto. Ask whether your post would still be accurate if someone found it in a drawer much later. The Round 1 transaction is the most durable item in the capsule: tronscan.org/#/transaction/c… 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗹. @justinsuntron @WinkLink_Oracle #TronEcoStar

𝗣𝗶𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗮 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝟯 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝘀. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗜 𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗪𝗜𝗡𝗸𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀. A lighthouse doesn't wait for ships to call it. It sweeps continuously, so anything entering its range is spotted quickly. Automation works in a similar spirit. 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗪𝗜𝗡𝗸𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸'𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗻𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘂𝗽𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝟯 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝘀. If a condition is true, the node simulates the job and then performs it. If not, the beam moves on and comes back on the next sweep. Here's why that rhythm is useful: ➜ 𝗤𝘂𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 to conditions that change rapidly ➜ 𝗡𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 on a developer's laptop or reminder ➜ 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗼𝘂𝗿 that users can reason about ➜ 𝗩𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, since performed jobs land on-chain There are a few things the lighthouse can't do for you. It can't fix a badly written condition, and it can't run a job that hasn't been funded. 𝗨𝗽𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗪𝗜𝗡 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗲, 𝘀𝗼 𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝘀 𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰. I'd also keep the check logic light, so each sweep stays efficient. And as always, I'd test the whole thing on Nile before relying on it. The lighthouse comparison helps me explain Automation to people who've never written a contract. Everyone understands a beam that keeps sweeping, whether or not anyone is watching. The Automation guide explains each stage of the sweep: doc.winklink.org/v2/doc/auto… 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗽𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝘆 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀. @justinsuntron @WinkLink_Oracle #TronEcoStar