Get Crunk retweeted
I've been told I need to talk about Greg Laurie so let's do that. This is just scratching the surface.
Laurie has spoken at TPUSA Faith events, including Faith Forward Pastors’ Summits (2025 and 2026), AmFest 2025, and a stop of the Make Heaven Crowded Tour hosted at Harvest Riverside.
Greg Laurie / Harvest Christian Fellowship Romania lawsuits.
Since 2025, 22 plaintiffs have sued Laurie, Harvest, and others over alleged severe child sexual abuse by former pastor/missionary Paul Havsgaard at Harvest-funded homes in Romania from 1998–2008.
Allegations against Laurie and Harvest center on negligence and cover-up, heavy funding with little oversight, ignoring a 2004 internal report, giving Havsgaard a “soft landing,” and a pattern of concealment. Laurie is not accused of personal sexual misconduct.
Harvest calls the suits sensational “financial extortion,” says the target should be the alleged perpetrator, and is vigorously defending in court.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=u5EdcP…
charliekirk.co.za/video/char…
m.youtube.com/watch?v=6tDulf…
youtu.be/aHlxsDyXHu8?si=A3I-…
Get Crunk retweeted
The Learjet 60 that crashed had an address that Ghislaine Maxwell used to go anonymous and hide her crimes. CEO Adam Robinson created websites to identify hidden people. Weird coincidence?
Get Crunk retweeted
SHOCKING: The Secret Family Business youtube.com/watch?v=YdCM3Heg…
Get Crunk retweeted
3 days ago, one of Tyler and Lance's friends changed their username to "I'm Gonna Rat!"
He might be trolling, but at least we know that our work is being noticed. @DiligentDenizen @billiewebbb keep up the good work!
Here's everything I've got on the furry question. 🧵
Start with the part everyone overlooked. Tyler Robinson's FurAffinity account wasn't just disabled. Between Sept 17 and Sept 20, 2025, it flipped to the site's "voluntarily disabled" notice, the one an account shows when it's turned off from inside its own settings. That is five to eight days after he was locked up, right after the furry stories ran. Nobody has said who did it, or how.
That's where this starts. It ends with the person who lived with him, under oath, on what was in his room. Times are UTC. Where something is a press claim, a forum claim or just a name match, I say so.
Get Crunk retweeted
1. The account went dark while he sat in jail
The account is furaffinity.net/user/craftin…, registered July 22, 2025, seven weeks before the shooting. It is empty on every copy anyone has: no posts, no favourites, nobody watched, nobody watching, no profile text. A name on a furry site, nothing more.
Tyler was arrested on Sept 12. On Sept 17 the page was still up; by Sept 20 it read: "User Craftin247 has voluntarily disabled access to their account and all of its contents. If this is your userpage and you would like to re-enable it, you may do so by logging in and re-enabling it in your Account Settings." That is the notice an account shows when it is turned off from inside its own settings. It still reads that way.
So in the three days after the Daily Mail ran its furry story and the Caller and the Post relayed it, somebody turned off an account whose owner had no internet. Whoever it was either had his login or got the site to do it. Nobody has said which.
Is the account his? The handle is, no question. His Steam alias list reads Craftin, Donald Trump, Craftini247, Craftin247. His Discord card says "Originally known as Craftin247#8170", with Steam "Craftin" and Xbox "Craftin248" linked. His Reddit accounts are u/Craftin247 and u/Craftin248. That he registered this FurAffinity account himself is what friends told the Mail; the page never says. Two namesakes from that week are not his: a Roblox "Craftin247" that a stranger made on Sept 12, and the Steam address id/craftin247, which sat empty until an unrelated 2016 account took it around Sept 19.
Get Crunk retweeted
This is the most thorough timeline Of Tyler and Lance's online activity. What do you notice?
Get Crunk retweeted
📣🚨 UVU CCTV Glitches and Missing Footage
I did some digging inspired by Muppet Masher’s post and I found out that UVU has a pretty long history of intermittent, partial, and complete outages of internet, VPN, and software apps.
They have a regular history of outages and issues with internet, VPN, and user access it seems. Could it be possible that some of the issues with CCTV that day could be from so many cell phones on their WiFi at the same time for Charlie Kirk?
I believe they are IP cameras. Advanced IP camera systems usually also have a hard drive backup or onboard SD card failsafe recording that is supposed to “backfill” any missing footage during temporary outages. I’m not sure if UVU’s cameras are equipped this way. If they are then any missing footage could still be there or could have been seized as evidence from the SD card or hard drive backups.
UVU had an IT outage 1hr 33mins before Charlie died.
This was also the same time the suspect left campus for the 2nd time.
There was a temporary glitch in the CCTV cameras which may have been caused by this outage.
The system was comprised for the entire time Charlie was there and remained comprised until the following Monday when they finished laying the pavers.
Get Crunk retweeted
Shadows of Seduction: Scott Ritter and the KGB's Honeytrap Legacy
The personal narrative of Scott Ritter, intertwined with Marina Khatiashvili, unveils a chapter in the shadowy world of espionage where personal and political realms collide. This complex saga, set against the backdrop of Ritter's significant role in arms control, offers a critical lens into the KGB's honeytrapping, a tactic leveraging human relationships for intelligence gathering. The Ritter-Khatiashvili story transcends a mere personal anecdote, reflecting the broader machinations of Cold War espionage where intimacy was weaponized and trust was a currency in the high stakes game of international intelligence.
Ritter's Votkinsk Assignment
During the waning years of the Cold War, Scott Ritter was deployed to Votkinsk, a significant industrial hub in the Soviet Union pivotal to missile manufacturing. His role, under the aegis of a Defense Department program, was to ensure compliance with disarmament agreements - a task fraught with geopolitical tensions and inherent distrust. It was here that Ritter encountered Marina Khatiashvili, ostensibly his guide and translator. Khatiashvili, reportedly under KGB oversight, was more than a mere facilitator; she was part of a calculated strategy, a living tool in the intricate and shadowy world of espionage. The seemingly routine assignment in Votkinsk was, for Ritter, the beginning of a journey that blurred the lines between personal affections and professional obligations.
The Honeytrap Strategy
The KGB's employment of honeytraps stands as one of the most intriguing yet ethically dubious tactics in the annals of espionage. This strategy involved the deliberate cultivation of intimate relationships to manipulate targets, usually foreign dignitaries or intelligence operatives, for extracting confidential information or for compromising them. In the complex web of international espionage, these relationships were intricately choreographed dances of seduction and deception. Agents or informants, often attractive and charming, were expertly trained to exploit the vulnerabilities of their targets, weaving a tapestry of affection and dependency that could be used to coax out secrets or influence decisions. The success of these operations hinged on a deep understanding of human psychology, and the KGB's proficiency in this realm was both renowned and feared.
Ritter and Khatiashvili's Relationship
The relationship between Ritter and Khatiashvili blossomed in an environment where personal and professional lines were inherently blurred. Ritter, then married, insists that his initial interactions with Khatiashvili were strictly professional and sanctioned, a claim that fits the cautious narrative of an intelligence officer aware of potential traps. However, their subsequent marriage, following Ritter's divorce, casts a curious light on the nature of their initial acquaintance. Was this a genuine romantic development, or could it have been influenced by the invisible hand of KGB maneuvering? The answer lies in the murky depths of Cold War espionage, where emotional entanglements were often part of a larger, more complex game.
The KGB's Approach to Honeytrapping
Honeytrapping, in the hands of the KGB, was elevated to an art form. It was not merely about creating a romantic façade but involved a comprehensive strategy encompassing psychological profiling, long-term relationship building, and careful orchestration of scenarios to maximize information extraction. Agents assigned to such tasks were not just operatives; they were actors in a high-stakes drama, trained to evoke trust, elicit sympathy, and, most importantly, remain undetected in their true intentions. These operations required meticulous planning and execution, often extending over years, with the end goal of either directly extracting information or placing the target in a compromising position that could be exploited for political leverage.
Ethical and Security Implications
The ethical quandaries presented by the use of honeytraps are profound. This method of espionage goes beyond mere information gathering, delving into the manipulation of human emotions and the exploitation of personal vulnerabilities. The targets, often unaware of the true nature of their relationships, find themselves ensnared in a web of deceit, with far-reaching implications for their personal lives and professional careers. The revelation of such manipulation can lead to a profound sense of betrayal, with psychological consequences that extend well beyond the immediate political or strategic gains of the operation.
Post-Cold War Revelations
The collapse of the Soviet Union opened the floodgates to a wealth of information on KGB operations, including the extensive use of honeytraps. These revelations have forced a reevaluation of numerous relationships from the Cold War era, casting them in a new light and often validating long-held suspicions. The Ritter-Khatiashvili story is just one of many that underscore the extensive reach and influence of Soviet intelligence operations, revealing a world where personal relationships were intricately entwined with the strategic objectives of one of the world's most formidable intelligence agencies.
Ritter's Case in Context
Scott Ritter's entanglement with Marina Khatiashvili, viewed through the lens of KGB honeytrapping tactics, presents a complex tableau of personal choices enmeshed in international espionage. While Ritter maintains the innocence and authenticity of his relationship, the context of his meeting with Khatiashvili, coupled with her reported connections to the KGB, invites speculation and curiosity. This relationship serves as a poignant example of the often indiscernible boundary between personal affairs and political machinations during a period marked by intrigue, suspicion, and the ever-present shadow of espionage.
Conclusion
The narrative of Scott Ritter and Marina Khatiashvili, set against the backdrop of the KGB's honeytrapping legacy, offers a compelling glimpse into the clandestine operations that shaped the Cold War. This story, emblematic of a time when love and loyalty were manipulated for strategic ends, serves as a testament to the complex interplay between the human heart and the cold calculations of international intelligence. In the annals of espionage, their story remains a poignant reminder of the intricate dance between personal desires and the machinations of powers beyond the control of the individuals caught in their web. – at Germignaga, Lombardia
This quoted post is unavailable.
Get Crunk retweeted
I'm fairly confident there is only one way to put a Chistmas tree together. I don't actually believe you could put the top section into the base, and then put the middle part at the top. I'm genuinely curious if anyone believes this story?
Get Crunk retweeted
Steve Bannon, who worked military intel and lived in China (just like Jack Posobiec), took this selfie with Jeffrey Epstein. Is that grin because of the stack of Michael Wolff’s Fire and Fury sitting on the table?
If Bannon already knew him, why was he later asking Jack about “Epstine”?
.@JackPosobiec on the Epstein files: "Don't sit there and tell me there's nothing when you told me there was something. That's the issue for the AG."
Get Crunk retweeted
Not one comment in an hour?I rest my case...@AnaEscobarShow
Replying to @AnaEscobarShow
@AnaEscobarShow One way to tell Ana's work is legit is by all the diversions the Judeostate produces to make people look the other way. And by the fact that they are suspressing her vids, sending in attack trolls,and the fake pod casters like Jizzie on Liar to scheme against her. Ana is brave and very good at snooping around. Take a slow look and you might be surprized!
Get Crunk retweeted
🚨 NEW LEGENDARY POKÉMON UNLOCKED 🚨
Legendary rarity. 120 HP. +100 condescension. Comes with its own yarmulke. 😂✨
Offers welcome. Lowballs will be met with Condescending Glare. 💀.
Get Crunk retweeted
Les Wexner's company lawyer was shot in the head the day before he was supposed to testify. They still have not named the man who chased him out of the car.
Arthur Shapiro managed The Limited account at Schwartz, Shapiro, Kelm & Warren in Columbus. He dealt with Robert Morosky, the number two under Wexner. The IRS had him for failing to file returns for about seven years and for tax shelters, including whether anyone helped him hide money. The grand jury was set for March 7, 1985.
On the morning of March 6 he was in his red BMW at Wesley Chapel Cemetery on Dublin Road, eating breakfast with a man who has never been identified. A witness described him as dressed in black, broad-brimmed hat, running with a limp. He chased Shapiro from the car, firing. Shapiro reached a condo door, pounded on it, and was shot twice in the head at close range. The shooter left in Shapiro's BMW. He was 43. Police called it a mob-style hit. It is still unsolved.
One name in the suspect file is accountant Berry Kessler, who had worked with Shapiro on the shelters. Two of Kessler's employees told the Columbus Dispatch that the day after the murder they saw Kessler counting a pile of money, and that a man matching the killer's description came to the office.
On June 6, 1991, Columbus Organized Crime Bureau analyst Elizabeth Leupp wrote a memo calling the killing one with "strong marks" of a Mafia hit. She noted that Shapiro managed The Limited account and that the grand jury could have forced him to disclose something damaging. The memo maps business ties around Wexner. It does not accuse him. Columbus police chief James Jackson was later accused of ordering that report destroyed. Bob Fitrakis got a copy anyway and printed it.
The man who handled Wexner's company account died the day before he could talk. Then the chief of police was accused of burying the memo that mapped the business ties around that account. Who has connections strong enough to get a police chief to destroy a homicide report?











































