Squaddies = 🚫 Megxiters that can't have a civil debate = 🚫 *** My apologies in advance for the typos. If you share my content, please credit me.

Joined March 2025
If any UK people would like to copy and paste the post below and report it online to Met Police, feel free and PLEASE DO. I reported The Sun for violations under Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: 'Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.' If you know of others, please include them if you file a report. I am an American and I have no idea if I've come close to exhausting all the laws that may have been violated. *** Reposting is always nice, too. It will definitely take more than just a few to prompt the Met Police to take action. ***I know others have already reported to Met Police, THANK YOU for your due diligence, care, and for prompting me to look for specific UK laws violated within the UK. **** xitter.cf/GoFakeYourselfM/status…
Replying to @metpoliceuk
@metpoliceuk -- I am having difficulty on your website reporting a possible violation of Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: ā€˜Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.’ *** According to public records, the UK news publication, The Sun, may have conspired – within the UK – to pay individuals to travel to the Philippines, view child pornography, and destroy &/or tamper with evidence. They did not report the existence of the alleged child pornography evidence to local police. Some or all of these allegations are crimes in the UK, too. According to the embedded metadata within photographs taken and published by The Sun, staff and/or others paid by the publication viewed what they reportedly believe to be child pornography – FOUR DAYS before it was turned over to police. In fact, the individuals paid by The Sun never reported nor turned the evidence over to local police. What happened in those 4 days they had access to the alleged child pornography is unknown. The Sun published redacted close-up photographs of some of the material suggesting they did, in fact, look very closely at the material and the photographs they took may exist in an unredacted form within the UK. If the photographs are indeed copies of child pornography, that suggests the unredacted photos constitute child pornography, as well. These are very serious allegations yet there is credible evidence to warrant an investigation into The Sun’s actions and communications, with regard to this matter. You must investigate the planning, communications, and actions taken -– and not taken – by people paid by The Sun to participate in this conspiracy. I am posting this on my social media with the hope that others within the UK might have an easier time reporting it than me, in the US. I understand many UK citizens are very concerned about this matter receiving the attention it warrants. There should be ZERO tolerance if crimes have been committed. Thank you and please confirm if/when you have seen this. *** LINKS: 1. Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/199… 2. Metadata for The Sun’s October 19, 2026 photograph of evidence they believe to be child pornography. They reported staff viewed the materials: jimpl.com/results/Rwphz97Un9… 3. The October 19, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 4. Metadata for The Sun’s October 23, 2026 photograph of police taking possession of the evidence The Sun viewed and photographed, FOUR DAYS PRIOR: jimpl.com/results/vtx85KhgtK… 5. The October 23, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 6. The Sun's report/statements regarding the material, in question: the-sun.com/news/17198310/me…
3
11
38
758
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Replying to @GoFakeYourselfM
Makes Lauren’s theories not so outrageous. Sharing Samantha’s name as a victim is wrong. I don’t care who the victims are you just don’t name victims.
1
2
4
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
NEW VIDEO 🚨 IF THIS IS TRUE... IT'S OVER! Meghan FLEES as Police Drops Bombshell News! Did the police set a trap for the 'duchess'? Tom Markle Jr lying? Shock new development! youtu.be/wpv0z-PB0w4?si=BVmx… via @YouTube
10
12
108
5,809
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
More on my series of articles and info about the sussex sewer squad and how they are co-opted by foreign entities to create dissent and distrust in the British Royal Family and to destabilise the institution - they are probably the ones behind the anti-monarchist movement too and I am sure the British & other security agencies know about it.
2
22
930
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Harry you stupid fuck
Replying to @bornfirstkindly
Nessuno ricorda la terza puntata della serie netflix
66
130
4
1,734
39,270
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
I wonder if Roslyn Markle sent Doria a letter, you know, to keep Doria's children safe. But if she did I suppose we would have heard about it by now. I guess she only cared about Meghan and not the other kids.
There are now 2 letters in the Markle salacious saga: • One sent in 2019 from Roslyn Markle, who waited 44 years after divorcing Thomas to suddenly send a letter to the British police despite being and american citizen living in america who has NEVER been in the UK; • the Letter sent by meghan to her father in 2025, while he was still on his hospital bed follwing his amputation, calling him a pedophile who abuse little girls and telling him he will never see his grandchildren. Yet my dears, at no point did Roslyn Markle, nor Meghan Markle, the two who are making those allegations contact the actual American authorities to start an investigation🤔 Despite claiming they have evidence of his pedophilia, none of these women were interested in involving the authorities. They were content to just tormenting him, tarnish his name and leaving it at that. Quite an odd behavior, from both women...did they failed to involve the authorities because they do not care about the safety of litter girls OR because the allegations were made up and they did not want any investigations to happen?šŸ˜ This is exactly why the original letter of 2019 starting these allegations becomes key. Roslyn sent the letter but WHO wrote the letter? Meghan's involvement in the original letter of 2019 accusing her own father of sexual misconduct is highlighted by the specific department to which Roslyn Markle, thomas Markle' ex wife of 44 years, addressed that letteršŸ”„ Even British citizens born and raised in the UK do not know all the different departments inside the Metropolitan police or how to go about reaching them. Yet Roslyn Markle, a US citizen who has never been to the UK, addressed a letter about sexual allegations against her husband to the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC). The FTAC is a joint police and mental health unit in the UK that assesses and manages risks posed to prominent public figures, such as senior politicians, the Royal Family, and visiting heads of state. Now, HOW would Roslyn Markle have known about that special department and how to get in contact them?šŸ˜ She would not UNLESS someone who lives in the UK, and is either a senior politicians, a member of the RF or a visiting head of state and who receive government protective services, gave her that information. WHO is the Only person that Roslyn Markle knew in the UK who had that profile in 2019? MEGHAN MarklešŸ”„ Yes my dears, the reason why meghan had a copy of the letter at the ready when the Met could not even find it, is because Meghan wrote the ORIGINAL letter accusing her own father of allegations of pedophilia in 2019. Then this conniving snake sent that letter to Roslyn to cover her tracks and instructed Roslyn on where to send that letter, NOT to the US authorities which could have started an actual investigation, but to the UK department of FTAC. Why? Because meghan did not actually want an investigation to be started which proves the allegations are probably made up; what she wanted was for her own father to be placed on the list of fixated person with mental health issues so that he could be denied entry in the UK and he could never come close to her nor the RF and expose the carefully constructed lies she told to infiltrate the RFšŸ”„ Yes, Meghan is the ONLY one who stood to gain from that letter being sent to the FTAC in 2019. She wrote that letter. Just like she wrote every other letter šŸ¤·šŸ½ā€ā™€ļø These are the desperate length this psychopath has gone to, to ostracise her own father from her new life. The question is, are these allegations of pedophilia actually real or did she make it up as she make up everything else in life, just to hurt the people she set out to destroy?šŸ¤” Well and so, I hope the authorities launch a full blown investigation into the entire Markle family, to include that crow-looking meghan and her retarded letters that she sends all over the placešŸ˜µā€šŸ’« Meanwhile, a source close to the Royal Family told the Daily Mail about this new sussex circus 'This is a matter for the Sussex household.'šŸ”„ Indeed, let the garbage sort itself out. The Royal family need to put Meghan on the FTAC list and ban her from ever approaching any member of the RF, especially the Wales. If there is someone who is profoundly unstable mentally and deserve to be on that list, it is Meghan Markleā˜•ļø 2/2 #MeghanMarkleisALiar
10
4
1
47
1,094
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Replying to @GoFakeYourselfM
Phase 2. I now recognize the signs. I must make sure we are safe ( and generously compensated & retain titles)
2
1
8
97
***This 'ex-detective' is carrying MeMe's message to Mark Dolan.*** "...dismissed the allegations...knowing of the disputes the former wife might make..." "...and this is a reason she didn't follow up." Then why did she write that she "KNOWS" her Dad is an abuser after nothing came from an investigation she said believed was underway in 2019? **** This does not bode well for the other claims he shared. The above are MeMe approved statements. So, everything he claimed was almost certainly also MeMe approved.
2
1
22
442
(Fade in) *Tearless crying begins* MeMe: "Oh, my sweet Lil'Bidet, Mama is imagining you on 35mm film with my daddy, and my heart is shattered into a million and 44 pieces. That's why I don't have one. Daddy done busted it all apart." (END SCENE) Everything that's been found is 'girls' not 'boys.' Rest assured, the next shoe that will drop is currently being raised high....whatever it is.
5
1
31
562
Disgusting. This had to be reported. HAD TO. MeMe's orders. hellomagazine.com/royalty/93…
1
3
82
Replying to @metpoliceuk
@metpoliceuk -- I am having difficulty on your website reporting a possible violation of Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: ā€˜Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.’ *** According to public records, the UK news publication, The Sun, may have conspired – within the UK – to pay individuals to travel to the Philippines, view child pornography, and destroy &/or tamper with evidence. They did not report the existence of the alleged child pornography evidence to local police. Some or all of these allegations are crimes in the UK, too. According to the embedded metadata within photographs taken and published by The Sun, staff and/or others paid by the publication viewed what they reportedly believe to be child pornography – FOUR DAYS before it was turned over to police. In fact, the individuals paid by The Sun never reported nor turned the evidence over to local police. What happened in those 4 days they had access to the alleged child pornography is unknown. The Sun published redacted close-up photographs of some of the material suggesting they did, in fact, look very closely at the material and the photographs they took may exist in an unredacted form within the UK. If the photographs are indeed copies of child pornography, that suggests the unredacted photos constitute child pornography, as well. These are very serious allegations yet there is credible evidence to warrant an investigation into The Sun’s actions and communications, with regard to this matter. You must investigate the planning, communications, and actions taken -– and not taken – by people paid by The Sun to participate in this conspiracy. I am posting this on my social media with the hope that others within the UK might have an easier time reporting it than me, in the US. I understand many UK citizens are very concerned about this matter receiving the attention it warrants. There should be ZERO tolerance if crimes have been committed. Thank you and please confirm if/when you have seen this. *** LINKS: 1. Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/199… 2. Metadata for The Sun’s October 19, 2026 photograph of evidence they believe to be child pornography. They reported staff viewed the materials: jimpl.com/results/Rwphz97Un9… 3. The October 19, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 4. Metadata for The Sun’s October 23, 2026 photograph of police taking possession of the evidence The Sun viewed and photographed, FOUR DAYS PRIOR: jimpl.com/results/vtx85KhgtK… 5. The October 23, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 6. The Sun's report/statements regarding the material, in question: the-sun.com/news/17198310/me…
23
113
12
417
5,500
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
UK laws are addressed below. ā¬ In addition, all 50 U.S. states have mandatory reporting laws that require designated professionals to report suspected child abuse or neglect to authorities. Designated professionals Includes law enforcement professionals. Knowingly failing to report can lead to criminal charges. Meghan Markle said on multiple occasions that she was made aware of potential child abuse. With all of her public statements she has never once stated that she reported it to the proper authorities in the respective countries where the abuse may have happened. In her interview with Oprah Winfrey in March of 2021, Meghan spoke about feeling a sense of betrayal and "loss" regarding her father after he denied cooperating with the press. These statements were made in the United States. In an interview with The Cut in August 2022, she noted that she felt she had "lost" her father through media scrutiny. These statements were made in the United States. In the 2022 Netflix docuseries Harry & Meghan, her husband referred to the emotional loss and estrangement of Meghan's relationship with her father. "Of course it's incredibly sad what happened. She had a father before this, and now she doesn't have a father. And I shouldered that because if Meg wasn't with me, then her dad would still be her dad." These statements were made in the United States. Markle is not shy and never misses an opportunity to praise herself publicly. If she had reported these very serious events she needs to make that clear. In the meantime, we can rightfully assume she has not.
Replying to @metpoliceuk
@metpoliceuk -- I am having difficulty on your website reporting a possible violation of Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: ā€˜Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.’ *** According to public records, the UK news publication, The Sun, may have conspired – within the UK – to pay individuals to travel to the Philippines, view child pornography, and destroy &/or tamper with evidence. They did not report the existence of the alleged child pornography evidence to local police. Some or all of these allegations are crimes in the UK, too. According to the embedded metadata within photographs taken and published by The Sun, staff and/or others paid by the publication viewed what they reportedly believe to be child pornography – FOUR DAYS before it was turned over to police. In fact, the individuals paid by The Sun never reported nor turned the evidence over to local police. What happened in those 4 days they had access to the alleged child pornography is unknown. The Sun published redacted close-up photographs of some of the material suggesting they did, in fact, look very closely at the material and the photographs they took may exist in an unredacted form within the UK. If the photographs are indeed copies of child pornography, that suggests the unredacted photos constitute child pornography, as well. These are very serious allegations yet there is credible evidence to warrant an investigation into The Sun’s actions and communications, with regard to this matter. You must investigate the planning, communications, and actions taken -– and not taken – by people paid by The Sun to participate in this conspiracy. I am posting this on my social media with the hope that others within the UK might have an easier time reporting it than me, in the US. I understand many UK citizens are very concerned about this matter receiving the attention it warrants. There should be ZERO tolerance if crimes have been committed. Thank you and please confirm if/when you have seen this. *** LINKS: 1. Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/199… 2. Metadata for The Sun’s October 19, 2026 photograph of evidence they believe to be child pornography. They reported staff viewed the materials: jimpl.com/results/Rwphz97Un9… 3. The October 19, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 4. Metadata for The Sun’s October 23, 2026 photograph of police taking possession of the evidence The Sun viewed and photographed, FOUR DAYS PRIOR: jimpl.com/results/vtx85KhgtK… 5. The October 23, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 6. The Sun's report/statements regarding the material, in question: the-sun.com/news/17198310/me…
1
3
7
277
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Replying to @Furiosa24
The FBI is the most corrupt law enforcement agency possibly in the entire world. I think this is...not good. They will destroy or invent evidence and witness statements, if they want to, and have done so many, many times. xitter.cf/Furiosa24/status/21148…
Excellent! Investigate everyone!
1
2
58
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Replying to @according2_taz
A date/time stamp on the original letter can easily be recreated on a different letter.
1
19
435
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Well, this is a bit of a stretch aimed at making it appear Murky and Dumbo are distraught when that is not true. It's actually October half-term break in Cotswolds schools and they are on holidays until 2 November. Talk about lying in a PR statement to frame Murky as the victim. She's disgusting šŸ™„
2
4
59
1,518
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
LOOK! A wholesome, happy family !!!ā™„ļø
25
138
6
1,704
7,580
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Replying to @metpoliceuk
@metpoliceuk -- I am having difficulty on your website reporting a possible violation of Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: ā€˜Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.’ *** According to public records, the UK news publication, The Sun, may have conspired – within the UK – to pay individuals to travel to the Philippines, view child pornography, and destroy &/or tamper with evidence. They did not report the existence of the alleged child pornography evidence to local police. Some or all of these allegations are crimes in the UK, too. According to the embedded metadata within photographs taken and published by The Sun, staff and/or others paid by the publication viewed what they reportedly believe to be child pornography – FOUR DAYS before it was turned over to police. In fact, the individuals paid by The Sun never reported nor turned the evidence over to local police. What happened in those 4 days they had access to the alleged child pornography is unknown. The Sun published redacted close-up photographs of some of the material suggesting they did, in fact, look very closely at the material and the photographs they took may exist in an unredacted form within the UK. If the photographs are indeed copies of child pornography, that suggests the unredacted photos constitute child pornography, as well. These are very serious allegations yet there is credible evidence to warrant an investigation into The Sun’s actions and communications, with regard to this matter. You must investigate the planning, communications, and actions taken -– and not taken – by people paid by The Sun to participate in this conspiracy. I am posting this on my social media with the hope that others within the UK might have an easier time reporting it than me, in the US. I understand many UK citizens are very concerned about this matter receiving the attention it warrants. There should be ZERO tolerance if crimes have been committed. Thank you and please confirm if/when you have seen this. *** LINKS: 1. Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/199… 2. Metadata for The Sun’s October 19, 2026 photograph of evidence they believe to be child pornography. They reported staff viewed the materials: jimpl.com/results/Rwphz97Un9… 3. The October 19, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 4. Metadata for The Sun’s October 23, 2026 photograph of police taking possession of the evidence The Sun viewed and photographed, FOUR DAYS PRIOR: jimpl.com/results/vtx85KhgtK… 5. The October 23, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 6. The Sun's report/statements regarding the material, in question: the-sun.com/news/17198310/me…
23
113
12
417
5,500
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
It went something like this
šŸ¤– Made with AI
11
38
6
280
8,868
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Mendacious meddling menace Meghan Markle deserves no apology from anyone, but keep an eye on dodgy deviant Thomas Markle, Jr. also. How much was this rotten rat paid to shove the knife in? Something about the role of both of them in this stinky story truly stinks to high heaven. #MeghanMarkle #ThomasMarkle #TomMarkle #TomSr #TomJr #ThomasMarkleJr #ThomasMarkleSr #KingCharles #PrinceHarry #SussexSquad #FormerRoyals #PrivateCitizens #Abuse #Porn #ChildPorn #ChildAbuse #MetPolice #MetropolitanPolice #FBI #PiersMorgan #Apology #Sorry #SorryNotSorry #Truth #Fiction #Publicity #PublicityPeddler #SympathySeeker #SympathyCard #Deranged #Deviant #Liar #LiarLiar #MeghanMarkleLiar #MeghanMarkleExposed
I’m very sorry her father is an alleged paedophile and that she knew this while falsely accusing the Royal Family of being callous racists.
9
25
1
200
3,287