I'm just a girl.
In My Bag 🎒
Joined June 2024
- Tweets4.3K
- Following497
- Followers1.8K
- Likes6.3K
Threadss retweeted
My exact thoughts when I fade a “Cancer Coin” or any coin that focuses on “Donations”
Threadss retweeted
tbh I’m not even mad. It’s typical of the grifters and uncreatives in CT to see the success of a community and narrative, then try to vamp it
We dug for rageguy in the pumpfun archives because of the meme. We’re not KOL paid shill accounts extracting from our followers. We’re just trenchers. We found rageguy in the trenches and worked hard to get it in front of people
Instead of working with us and helping push the rageguy narrative, they slandered us, launched a new coin, lied about launching it and ran away with all the creator fees
It was hard to believe at first. These were all accounts I’d listened to and respected in the past, so I understand why some have fallen for their lies. They spent weeks fudding rageguy, calling the team porkies, and sewing confusion and lies in spaces on the timeline
They are the problem with this space
It happens to every blue chip memecoin. There will always be extractors and vamps
Real community always wins
OG always wins
Steal our art, lie about our people, we see you. CT sees you
There is only one $RAGEGUY
Threadss retweeted
THESIS PT 888 by Ragzy The Rager🤬📈
Navigating through PVPs
The Importance of “Crypto” Lore:
The “IT” factor
MYTH: “if it’s a good meme then the market will buy it”
WRONG.
As stated in my original thesis on August 4th, I had been looking for a Rageguy runner the entire bull cycle. I bought over 10+ Rageguys in hopes they would be “the one.” Some were newly deloyed, or older and couldn’t seem to gain momentum.
I thought “what is it going to take for people to see the value, and why were some more “valuable” than others. Was it the team, was it marketing?
What was “IT” ?!”
So I went and looked back at what gave $PEPE and $TROLL the “IT” factor. Why did the market choose this specific “PEPE” and “TROLL” over the dozens of others? You see, it’s funny bc the meme actually has nothing to do with it. Because anyone could create a PEPE today and put it on chain, it doesn’t mean it will be successful. It doesn’t mean people will buy it just because it’s “PEPE.” You’re thinking a cabal? Let’s say a new “cabal” launched a new $PEPE and were able to get it to 20mil+, would it really last? Would it have staying power like the real $PEPE today? Probably not.
This is because the “chosen one” $PEPE had an “IT” factor that was marketable to a crypto audience. No surprise, so did $TROLL.
The “IT” factor for both of these had to do with the *contract address.* So I’m sitting there thinking, ok - the contract address is actually really important bc it gives the meme “staying power.” The lore of the CA itself is the “CA lore” which is seperate from the original “meme” lore.
example:
$PEPE
meme lore: 4chan / boys club
ca lore: 0x69
$TROLL
meme lore: 4chan / rage comics
ca lore: relic
The “IT” factor was what eliminated all pvps, allowing both $PEPE and $TROLL to prevail as “the one.”
When looking at the $RAGEGUY relic on @pumpdotfun everything was pristine, down to the very last detail. And the lore of the contract address was the “IT” factor- it was just tooooo good. A relic with the catchphrase “Fu” and “Rageguy” in the same CA?! I knew nothing was going to beat that narrative.
This is why I believe, if there is going to be a “Rageguy” and the market is going to embrace the “Rageguy” character, then it has to be this one.
You can reference thesis 69-777 for additional information on the CA lore of the $RAGEGUY relic.
written by Ragzy ✍️ not grok
