Editor-in-Chief, @sunnewstamil | Recipient of @RNGAwards | @VikatanAwards & Bala Kailasam memorial award.
Chennai, India
Joined May 2015
- Tweets20.9K
- Following2K
- Followers303K
- Likes44.6K
Muslims Are Thrilled About El-Sayed’s Win. But Not Because of His Faith.
Yet in interviews, Muslim voters from Illinois to Michigan to Washington, D.C., said they did not see his win as significant because he shares their faith. Instead, many see Mr. El-Sayed, the son of Egyptian immigrants, not primarily as a religious touchstone, but as part of a progressive Democratic coalition taking root across the country, one that prioritizes things like affordability, universal health care and ending U.S. funding for Israel.
“Our country isn’t an Islamic-based nation,” said Mohamad Saab, 23, a college student who also voted for Mr. El-Sayed in Dearborn. “It’s a secular nation, and we want it to be that way.”
nytimes.com/2026/11/04/us/mu… via @NYTimes
24-Hour Period For Production Before Magistrate Runs From Time Of #Detention & Not From Formal #Arrest : #SupremeCourt
Attempt to draw an artificial distinction between 'detention' and 'arrest' is Constitutionally unsustainable, the Court ruled.
#BREAKING #SupremeCourt's important ruling on 'arrest' and 'detention' :
1. The period of 24-hours [for production before the Magistrate] in terms of Article 22 would commence from the date and time of detention of the person detained, when his liberty stands curtailed, and not from the time of his formal arrest.
2. In the event such detention continues beyond 24 hours, before the person is produced before the Magistrate, he shall be forthwith released from custody.
3. While computing the 24-hour deadline, no other time period is permitted to be excluded therefrom, except the time necessary for journey from the place of arrest to the Court of the Magistrate.
4 .The decisions of the Orissa High Court in Aryama Pattnaik, Madras High Court in Kannan, and Kerala High Court in Arun K Thomas, do not lay down the correct law qua interpretation of Article 22(2).
5. The detaining authority should keep in mind not only the 24-hour deadline mandated by Article 22(2) but also ensure that such detention should not extend beyond the reasonable period within the 24-hour period considering the circumstances of the case in terms of Section 58 of BNSS.
6. At the time of production, the Magistrate is duty-bound to record the actual date and time of detention of the person produced before him when his liberty stood curtailed, and examine whether the 24-hour deadline has been complied with or not from the time of suchc detention. If there is a breach of 24-hour deadline, the concerned person shall be fortwith released from detention.
7. The Magistrate shall also examine at the time of production whether the detention of the person produced, though within the time frame of 24 hours, has exceeded the period which can be construed to be reasonable in the circumstances of the case. If he is satisfied that the detention in custody has been for a longer period than what is reasonable, he may decline remand.
மு.குணசேகரன் M.Gunasekaran retweeted
#BREAKING #SupremeCourt's important ruling on 'arrest' and 'detention' :
1. The period of 24-hours [for production before the Magistrate] in terms of Article 22 would commence from the date and time of detention of the person detained, when his liberty stands curtailed, and not from the time of his formal arrest.
2. In the event such detention continues beyond 24 hours, before the person is produced before the Magistrate, he shall be forthwith released from custody.
3. While computing the 24-hour deadline, no other time period is permitted to be excluded therefrom, except the time necessary for journey from the place of arrest to the Court of the Magistrate.
4 .The decisions of the Orissa High Court in Aryama Pattnaik, Madras High Court in Kannan, and Kerala High Court in Arun K Thomas, do not lay down the correct law qua interpretation of Article 22(2).
5. The detaining authority should keep in mind not only the 24-hour deadline mandated by Article 22(2) but also ensure that such detention should not extend beyond the reasonable period within the 24-hour period considering the circumstances of the case in terms of Section 58 of BNSS.
6. At the time of production, the Magistrate is duty-bound to record the actual date and time of detention of the person produced before him when his liberty stood curtailed, and examine whether the 24-hour deadline has been complied with or not from the time of suchc detention. If there is a breach of 24-hour deadline, the concerned person shall be fortwith released from detention.
7. The Magistrate shall also examine at the time of production whether the detention of the person produced, though within the time frame of 24 hours, has exceeded the period which can be construed to be reasonable in the circumstances of the case. If he is satisfied that the detention in custody has been for a longer period than what is reasonable, he may decline remand.
சிதம்பரம் நடராஜர் கோயில் நிர்வாகம்; பொது தீட்சிதர்கள் தொடர்ந்த வழக்கில் உயர்நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவுக்கு தடை விதித்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்! barandbench.com/news/litigat…
Keisha Lance Bottoms scripts history as first Black woman Governor in US #Midterms26 #KeishaLanceBottoms
மு.குணசேகரன் M.Gunasekaran retweeted
Five weeks ago we reported that two Election Commissioners had objected 14 times in 10 months, revealing an unprecedented rift inside the Election Commission.
Since then the Commission has reversed course on almost EVERY move the two Commissioners had
red-flagged.
The last was Form 6.
The SIR declaration is now out of the online form everywhere, including the states where the SIR is still running. It’s a separate declaration now.
With this, the reversal is complete. Let me explain.
indianexpress.com/article/in…
🧵 (1/13)
Democrats will retake control of both the House and Senate, CNN projects, winning significant power to check the White House for the final two years of Donald Trump's presidency. Follow live updates. cnn.it/4jXpcHg
தமிழ்நாட்டில் தனியார் மருத்துவக் கல்லூரிகளில் 688 எம்பிபிஎஸ் இடங்கள் நிரப்பப்படாமல் உள்ளன. அதிகாரபூர்வமாக வசூலிக்கப்படும் கட்டணம் அதிகம் என்பதால் மாணவர்கள் சேர முன்வரவில்லை.
Tamil Nadu Govt Allows 6 Shows a Day for New Tamil Releases from 6:00 AM to 2:30 AM; 6 Shows Granted for Weekends and Holidays @CMOTamilnadu
Police must serve the State, which endures, and not the party in government, which changes: Madras High Court
thehindu.com/news/national/t…
'CM Office Is Not So Fragile': Madras High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To DMK Councillor Who Abused Chief Minister Joseph Vijay.
Court also said police must serve the state; not the party in government, which changes.
livelaw.in/high-court/madras…
பத்திரிகையாளர் நண்பர் பரத்தின் அகால மரணம் அதிர்ச்சி அளிக்கிறது. செய்தியாளராக, விமர்சகராக எனது நெறியாள்கையில் பல விவாதங்களில் பங்கேற்று நயம்பட கருத்துகளை பகிர்ந்தவர். சில ஆண்டுகளில் முழுநேர நெறியாளராகவும் பரிமளித்தார். அவரை இழந்து வாடும் குடும்பத்தினருக்கும் நண்பர்களுக்கும் ஆழ்ந்த இரங்கல் #பரத் #Bharath
மு.குணசேகரன் M.Gunasekaran retweeted
A Compromised Collegium Without Collegiality? Justice Kaul's Memoir Raises Concerns |@manuvichar
The observations corroborate the widespread perception regarding executive influence over judicial appointments and even case listings.
livelaw.in/articles/a-compro…
Podhu dikshitars have converted #Chidambaram temple premises into a food court: Madras HC
“The extensive damage to the heritage structure, the defiance to render the true and proper accounts, the collection of donations in the name of ‘annadhanam’ by putting up billboards mentioning the menu of the day ... conducting non-religious/commercial activities within the temple thereby converting the temple premises into a ‘food court’ and the failure to preserve the properties of the temple imminently warrants judicial interference to rectify the evil of maladministration,” a division bench of Justice G Jayachandran and Justice E Manoharan said.
