Engineer with an interest in systematic investing.

Joined June 2020
HML_Compounder retweeted
Everyday I grow stronger, while my enemy, the Nasdaq, gets weaker
5
9
1
192
8,730
HML_Compounder retweeted
1) Distribution rate ≠ total return 2) Return of capital, while tax efficient, does not necessarily indicate economic gain 3) Defending ROC’s tax efficiency while failing to differentiate return OF capital from return ON capital is funny
7
3
1
37
2,782
HML_Compounder retweeted
7
2
57
5,537
HML_Compounder retweeted
By now we’ve all seen the equal weight vs cap weight drawdown, which has historically mean reverted $RSP But this is actually a single for value, particularly small-cap value. $VBR $AVUV
2
3
2
37
13,980
5 years later... 66% NTSX / 34% DBMF - 9.2% CAGR - 10.4% ann. vol - 12.4% max drawdown 100% VBINX - 6.9% CAGR - 11.5% ann vol - 20.9% max drawdown
Replying to @choffstein
14/ By using capital efficient funds, we can achieve our target traditional asset allocation and free up capital to be invested in either economically diversifying asset classes or uncorrelated strategies. e.g. 66.6% $NTSX + 33.4% $DBMF (managed futures)
8
3
2
89
15,827
Interesting plot. Based solely on this chart, my answer would be no given the lower standalone and combined Sharpe. I’d wager correlation to typical risk assets is also higher than pure trend.
Interesting decomposition of SG CTA Index into Trend and Non-Trend. @bankeronwheels @atlasETF
10
2,113
AQR out with a new piece on inflation risk and building inflation-resilient portfolios. No surprise to see a 15%+ trend overlay getting recommended here. aqr.com/Insights/Research/Al…
7
1,164
HML_Compounder retweeted
15 years ago, if you did the responsible thing & bought $10,000 of 'risk-free' long-term Treasuries, you'd have $11,072 today. If instead you spent $9,995 on drugs & $5 on bitcoin, you'd have $42,778 today.
283
1,020
153
11,640
472,865
Thirsty Thursday for some. Understanding how shorting against the box can postpone a capital gain until the next tax year and how to use options to convert LTCL into STCL for others. The tax-aware world is so interesting.
1
1
2,828
HML_Compounder retweeted
Trend-following has been a great hedge for market downturns historically, overall and especially the fixed income sleeve.
1
6
52
2,987
HML_Compounder retweeted
I wanted to understand tax-aware long-short (TALS) portfolio mechanics, not just headline tax-alpha claims. So I built talsim, an open-source research simulator for leveraged tax-aware long-short strategies. Built for my own learning and exploration. Please stress-test it and point out flaws or gaps. #Investing #Finance #Quant #PersonalFinance
What needs to be true for leveraged tax-aware long-short (TALS) to be a pragmatic choice for an investor versus long-only index funds or direct indexing? High tax rates? Large embedded gains? Long horizon? Low financing/implementation costs?
5
5
1
49
11,294
HML_Compounder retweeted
366
370
170
8,784
547,432
HML_Compounder retweeted
I was reliably informed by FinTwit in 2020-21 that AQR’s funds were all terrible. @CliffordAsness in particular was a big dummy, style premia, trend, value, etc., all dumb. Anyways here are performance numbers since Jan 2021 compared to SPY/QQQ.
15
12
3
223
72,129
How would you rate this diet: 50% Carbs 30% Rice 20% Bread
How would you rate this allocation: 50% Index Funds 30% MAG 7 20% Growth Stocks Too risky?
71
96
9
3,877
177,781
Preach! Invest as much as you can, as soon as you can! (bi-weekly pay is doing this, it’s lump sum, not DCA). DCA is just an emotional crutch. Nothing wrong with that, but be honest. If it made sense for new $ it would also make sense to sell your 401k annually to re-DCA it.
Here’s a hot take to start your Tuesday off. And no, this is not rage bait. This is factual.
4
13
3,066
whenever i see someone talking about the downfall of the US hegemony, erosion of trust in the federal government, and the inevitable debasement of the US dollar... returnstackedetfs.com/stacki…
9
4
85
9,018
One of my favorite Greenblatt/Magic Formula stories is this one about how people given the names from the sort to choose from themselves underperformed the market, while the sort systematically outperformed it. greenbackd.com/2012/05/09/jo… This jar example is stellar too though.
A hedge fund manager put a jar of 1,776 jelly beans in front of a room at Google and proved in two rounds why most investors will always lose money. for free. His name is Joel Greenblatt. Gotham Capital. 50% a year for a decade. he asked the room to guess how many jelly beans were in the jar. First round: everyone wrote their guess silently. no talking. no looking around. the average was 1,771. five off. almost perfect. Second round: people said their guesses out loud. heard each other. adjusted. the average collapsed to 850. same room. same jar. the only thing that changed was influence. He told the room: the second guess is the stock market. everyone knows what they just read in the paper. what the guy next to them said. what they saw in the news. the cold independent guess was better. that is not how the market works. but that is where the opportunity is. Then he showed 20 years of data. the cheapest 20% of stocks averaged 38% a year. the most expensive averaged the least. the strategy is simple. the reason it still works is that people are still crazy. and they always will be. 55 minutes. one jar. still free.
4
3
88
26,348
h/t to @Greenbackd for the blog post
2
815
HML_Compounder retweeted
I can make you see colours that don’t exist!
1,856
10,582
4,628
165,522
50,641,121