To every parent at @habsboys & @habsgirlsschool - please read this.
The school is using #FireAndRehire tactics to change teacher contracts
This is the same brutal approach used by P&O. It has no place in education
We won't stay silent 💙
@NEUnion @DanielKebedeNEU @Telegraph
NEUHerts retweeted
A reminder that Suella was heavily involved in the £700 million Rwanda plan which resulted in 4 volunteers being deported, backed Liz Truss in the leadership battle and resigned as Home Secretary because of an accidental breach of the ministerial code then sacked during her second go.
Oops.
NEUHerts retweeted
Nigel Farage has called Andy Burnham “a liar” after the PM said he had been told Russia interfered in the 2016 Brexit referendum.
As usual Farage is talking boll****
Get the actual FACTS here👇
NEUHerts retweeted
Who in the name of all things holy decided that it’s imperative that we “get the welfare bill down?
The UK welfare bill is projected at £360+ billion (around 10.7% to 11% of GDP), remaining lower as a proportion of national income than it was 15 years ago or during the 1980s.
NEUHerts retweeted
Protect our women! Who can seriously believe this anymore? More misogynistic than the Taliban.
NEUHerts retweeted
[Violence against women is the] "single greatest human rights violation of our generation."
"I do what I do in my mother's name, because I couldn't help her then. Now I can."
-Sir Patrick Stewart
NEUHerts retweeted
British “migrant hunters” reportedly detained by French police.
Imagine travelling to another country to tell foreigners to respect borders, only to discover that country’s laws apply to you too.
Absolutely delicious irony.
NEUHerts retweeted
I think Andy Burnham is sleepwalking into a terrible NHS winter crisis🚨🚨🚨
I’ve explained what’s currently going on: jujuliagrace.substack.com/p/…
NEUHerts retweeted
🚨 NEW: The Lib Dems say Nigel Farage had the “physical altercation” with Caroline Voaden
"He shoved a female MP out of the way, sending her flying so he could get to the front of the procession for the King's Speech"
NEUHerts retweeted
History was made from across the Atlantic as Pope Leo XIV became the first pontiff to ever cast a ballot in a U.S. election.
The Vatican confirmed Friday that the American-born pope submitted a mail-in ballot to his native Chicago ahead of November's midterm elections. According to the Holy See press office, the move aligns with his longstanding belief in civic duty.
Before ascending to the papacy, Pope Leo XIV was Cardinal Robert Prevost. The Vatican noted that he "has exercised his right to vote as a United States citizen, whenever he was eligible to do so."
"The Holy Father expresses his belief in the right and the duty of citizens to participate in democratic processes," the statement added, cementing a unprecedented intersection of papal authority and American democracy.
NEUHerts retweeted
Clement Attlee founded the NHS, built record numbers of council houses, nationalised Housing, Power, Rail, Energy, Steel, Fossil Fuel and employed more than 2m people in 5 years all with the greatest debt the UK had ever had.
And the economy boomed and debt fell.
NEUHerts retweeted
Now THAT is scary.
#FightTheRight
NEUHerts retweeted
YES. Prime Minister @andyburnham was correct when he blamed Brexit for small boats crisis👇
Let’s call this bull**** out TOGETHER
The 200,000 illegal migrants figure Farage is using is over several years and let’s remind ourselves how we got into this mess in the first place - BREXIT
And now in threatening to punish those parts of the country where people don’t vote his way the Reform party leader is betraying the basic principles of democracy - its shameless and grotesque bullying which shows nothing but contempt for voters
NEUHerts retweeted
NYC announces $35M Central Park water recirculation project to save 175M+ gallons of drinking water a year and curb street flooding - meanwhile loser ass republicans shun innovation and are still crying about trans people and immigrants.
NEUHerts retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 They say, “Tommy was protecting his family.” “They did it to him first.”
Two excuses. A jury heard and rejected both.
The Mail wrote about a public figure on holiday. Tommy hired private investigators to photograph journalists’ homes, then told a million followers “I will find you.”
That isn’t the same thing. And it isn’t protection.
Here’s what the jury actually heard.
What happened
In August 2024, while England was rioting, Robinson was on holiday in Cyprus, posting about the riots to his followers. The Mail found him there and ran a story: “Stoking riots from his sunbed.”
Over the next three days he went after the two reporters, Jacob Dirnhuber and Andrew Young.
🔺5 August: a direct message to Dirnhuber. “I’ll be knocking at your door.”
🔺5 August: a phone call to Young. Robinson told him he’d be coming to his home and that he’d “have to move house.”
🔺6 August: a post naming Dirnhuber, saying he and the other Mail journalists had “today been located.”
🔺7 August: a video to around a million followers. He said he had details of where they and their families lived. He told them to abide by “men’s rules.” Then: “The men, on the other hand, I will find you.”
He also hired private investigators to photograph their homes. He admitted it in court.
The result: Dirnhuber moved house. Young was given a close protection officer.
The law
The charge was harassment causing fear of violence. The prosecution had to prove a course of conduct that made each man fear violence on at least two occasions, and that Robinson knew or ought to have known it would.
That last part is an objective test. What Robinson says he meant doesn’t decide it. What decides it is what a reasonable person would expect a million followers to do with “I will find you.”
His defence
He said he was protecting his family. That is a real defence in law, if the conduct is reasonable for protecting someone. Police had given him four threat-to-life warnings. The jury heard all of it.
Why it failed
He admitted the aim was pressure. Telling a million people where journalists live doesn’t protect your children. It endangers theirs.
🔺He didn’t dispute that they were frightened. Asked in evidence, he said no.
🔺He never complained to the press regulator. He never asked the Mail to change or remove the story. The legal route was there. He skipped it.
🔺His own words. “Men’s rules” is not the language of protection.
One is journalism, however much you dislike it. The other is a threat.
The jury
He chose this. At the magistrates’ court he was offered a trial there. He opted for a jury instead, saying he wanted 12 members of the British public to hear the evidence.
They did. They convicted on both counts.
Sentencing is on 16 December.







































