Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac) header
Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac) profile picture

Built revenue neutral homestead from scratch. Psycholinguistic counter-insurgent. Ultra-Christian Mega-Nationalist. God told me to clown on libs.

1060 W. Addison
Joined November 2023
Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)Photo by Counter-Insurgent Homesteading (@HomesteadPrac)
Replying to @Hispeedlowdrug
"And how can man die better Than facing fearful odds, For the ashes of his fathers, And the temples of his Gods"
54
883
25
30,216
529,966
Counter-Insurgent Homesteading retweeted
I think I’m going to spend the next two years listening to stories about aliens and demons on podcasts - all of which are plagiarized from Art Bell radio shows from the 1990s. Just feels more relevant and important than what politics will be.
101
113
9
2,451
83,708
Counter-Insurgent Homesteading retweeted
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
65,288
29,912
20,546
278,787
67,072,013
Explaining to normie conservatives that the establishment GOP never cared about them is like telling kids about the Easter bunny. They feel sad and stupid for believing. Makes me angry as hell.
21
Counter-Insurgent Homesteading retweeted
2016: Rush Limbaugh's audience was pro-Trump before he was. Fox News' audience was pro-Trump before Fox News conceded. The people are not mindless zombies to podcasters.
Podcasters are a lagging indicator of public sentiment, not the cause of it
3
16
143
2,292
Guys. The GOP was always against us. Last night, they succeeded.
10
Im gonna be up all night demoralizing libs of bluesky. Its gonna be awesome.
26
Counter-Insurgent Homesteading retweeted
So my boomer uncle has a hobby, torturing leftoid therapists. He sees a therapist once a week, gradually opens up about childhood trauma n shit. That's the hook. Starts introducing based boomer-con stuff, casually at first. When they start to push back, he can quote emails, with dates, from memory. Just step by step walking them through the conclusion that the Kenyan must dangle. They just can't deal and refuse to see him at some point and he just signs up for the next one. On a baker's dozen so far. He is endlessly entertained and they are in utter agony. A man's gotta have a hobby.
1
4
104
I hope it does win. 1911 or M1 winning would be cringe. Not as cringe as having a Barrett tho🤮
BREAKING: Idaho voters projected to choose the Winchester Model 1873 as their official state gun. 63% chance.
4
2
19
991
Your mental model of the average person needs to account for the fact that they obey the group and don't have a separate sense of right and wrong. That doesn't mean they are bad people. They simply need to be led.
Michigan voter says Haley Stevens' endorsement convinced her to vote for @MikeRogersforMI: "It’s almost like her endorsing him is giving people permission to change their minds."
1
29
Counter-Insurgent Homesteading retweeted
“That guy’s the best general. Put him in charge of the troops.” “But he’s the enemy’s general, sir.” “Oh, didn’t realize you hate meritocracy.”
97
1,126
51
17,360
408,748
Its fine to just not have an opinion on stuff you don't know anything about.
30
Counter-Insurgent Homesteading retweeted
a.co/d/06Br7Xgg The Right could learn a lot from "Playing to Win", a book from the early blogging internet about the mindset needed to compete. When operating under in a competitive environment, it is absolutely vital to understand the *actual rules*. Not some other, more restrictive code of honor. If there are effective tactics that you consider to mean or dishonorable to use, you are a "scrub" and you should go home. Politics doesn't have "house rules". War doesn't have "crimes". Besides losing. If you aren't Playing to Win, shut up, and let those who are competing on your behalf. Womanly howling and holding them back from the sidelines doesn't mean you are in the game. Just ruining for whatever side you claim to identify with. In the zero sum game we are trapped in, we will either Play to Win, or be ruled by those who will. Losers and scrubs don't get a say.
1
1
37
The rocky horror picture show is the worst thing ever and will be completely erased from history when we win.
20
Bars are 60% boomers on Halloween. Dark.
14
a.co/d/06Br7Xgg The Right could learn a lot from "Playing to Win", a book from the early blogging internet about the mindset needed to compete. When operating under in a competitive environment, it is absolutely vital to understand the *actual rules*. Not some other, more restrictive code of honor. If there are effective tactics that you consider to mean or dishonorable to use, you are a "scrub" and you should go home. Politics doesn't have "house rules". War doesn't have "crimes". Besides losing. If you aren't Playing to Win, shut up, and let those who are competing on your behalf. Womanly howling and holding them back from the sidelines doesn't mean you are in the game. Just ruining for whatever side you claim to identify with. In the zero sum game we are trapped in, we will either Play to Win, or be ruled by those who will. Losers and scrubs don't get a say.
1
1
37
Signs and indicators. The caseload of courts has increased drastically in recent months as the barrier to entry for filing law suits drops. SI is now automating the entire process for almost zero cost. The entire lawyer/judge/courtroom system has no hope of keeping up.
18