O mundo só gira à tua volta quando estás bêbedo. Vivam a poesia e as pessoas decentes.
Portugal
Joined June 2010
- Tweets17.9K
- Following3.3K
- Followers5.9K
- Likes89.6K
Isabel Risques retweeted
So, let me flag a few things, traitor.
1. "European security architecture" is a phrase the Kremlin uses. We already have one: it's called NATO.
2. You conflate (as you always do) the victim of this war with the aggressor. The aggressor is Russia.
3. "Root causes" is Russian for "do it our way" and you know it.
4. Nothing a word about Russian withdrawal, the occupied territories, POWs or deported children. Weird.
5. Lavrov wrote this for you.
6. Fuck Putin, fuck Russia, and fuck you.
President Trump today advanced an important discussion with several European leaders about the need for a broader European security architecture that can help establish the conditions for lasting peace.
Building on his leadership and the substantive work undertaken this week in Brussels with Ukraine, NATO, and our European partners, @SEPeaceMissions and I wanted to share some of the objectives guiding our ongoing discussions.
For more than 30 years, Europe and Russia have struggled to establish a sustainable security framework. Decades of mistrust, competing security concerns, and the devastating consequences of this war make this an extraordinarily difficult challenge, but one that is essential to lasting peace.
Our objective is to develop practical arrangements that address the security concerns of all sides, reduce the risk of future conflict, and create a more stable and predictable security environment.
We are exploring five principal goals: permanent security consultations, reliable crisis communications, greater military transparency, reciprocal measures to reduce escalation risks, and an enduring framework for long-term European security and stability.
Any arrangements must fully respect the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and independent decision-making of every nation. Each country will retain authority over its own security and alliances, and no country would have a veto over another’s sovereign choices. NATO will remain central to European collective defense, and this initiative would build upon existing institutions and commitments.
We will continue consultations through the Shell Bay format with Ukraine, NATO, the EU, and our European partners, expanding engagement to ensure that all relevant perspectives and ideas are considered. We will also engage Russia as part of the peace negotiations.
Next week in Abu Dhabi, the United States will convene the first trilateral peace discussions with Ukraine and Russia since February. All parties remain intensely engaged in preparing for substantive and productive negotiations. We will consult closely with our European partners on the sidelines and, if progress is made, aim to move toward a broader multilateral format with their direct participation.
These ideas continue to evolve, and we welcome thoughtful input. Creating the right structure will be critical to ending this war and transitioning from conflict toward conditions that make possible a durable peace.
This is difficult, detailed work. There are no easy solutions. But the opportunity to help end this devastating war and build a foundation for a more peaceful, secure, and prosperous Europe for generations to come makes it a challenge well worth undertaking.
We will see how these discussions develop and continue working intensively with all parties toward President Trump’s objective of a comprehensive and lasting peace.
Isabel Risques retweeted
Stephen Miller: This whole period that happened after World War II where the West began apologizing and groveling and begging—
Host: I don't even know what you're talking about right now. I asked you if there would be an election in Venezuela.
Isabel Risques retweeted
I remember this disgusting video of Vivek Ramaswamy pledging in 2023 that he would stop all support for Ukraine if he were elected president of the United States.
He constantly insulted the Ukrainian government, calling its leaders “warlords.” He said that “Ukraine versus Russia is not a battle between good versus evil.” And he said that “Ukraine will not be admitted to NATO – not now, not ever.”
Let me use Ramaswamy’s own language to send him a message: Dear “warlord” Vivek, you have lost miserably in every election you have run in, despite spending tens of millions of dollars. The reason is that people don’t like you. They know that when you enter an election, it automatically becomes “a battle between good and evil” - and you are not on the good side. I really hope that you will never be an elected official in the United States – “not now, not ever.”
Isabel Risques retweeted
After five years under occupation, told they were russian and Ukraine was the enemy, most buses leaving Oleshky still went to Ukraine
Forget russia’s fake ‘referendums’. Look where people chose to go. That’s how people in occupied territories actually feel
Isabel Risques retweeted
Atenção à Propaganda Russa!
Estão a fazer circular uma história inventada de uma casa de tortura na Ucrânia, onde se encontravam soldados ucranianos que aguardavam a fase de treinos.
Um grupo de pró-russos, encabeçado por uma esteticista que se fez passar por paramédica, criou no local um grande sururu, a esteticista até levou uma ambulância para o local... e depois fizeram um vídeo que puseram a circular sobre a "casa de tortura"na Ucrânia.
Um miúdo de 14 anos que estava entre os manifestantes saltou o muro para entrar na casa, caiu e partiu uma perna.
O Budanov teve que intervir, mandou-os a todos pra casa e a esteticista foi presa.
Fotos do miúdo e da esteticista
Isabel Risques retweeted
Arizona voters are calling election officials because they can’t find Trump on the ballot.
Somewhere, a civics teacher just walked into the desert and surrendered to the coyotes.
Isabel Risques retweeted
France is showing the world what real accountability looks like. Paris prosecutors have launched a major criminal investigation into Elon Musk’s X, raided its Paris offices and summoned Musk and former CEO Linda Yaccarino for questioning.
The allegations are staggering, political manipulation through algorithms, child sexual abuse material, sexually explicit deepfakes generated by Grok without consent, Holocaust denial, unlawful data extraction and election interference.
While Musk parades around pretending to be a defender of free speech, his platform faces allegations involving the exploitation of children, the sexual abuse of women through AI-generated imagery, the manipulation of political discourse and threats to democratic elections.
Bravo, France! This is what standing up to billionaire arrogance looks like. Democracy is not a billionaire's personal playground, social media platforms are not above the law, and Elon Musk does not get to buy himself immunity from accountability. France is making it clear that the rule of law still matters, and the rest of the democratic world should be paying attention.
Isabel Risques retweeted
Gdy chwalą cię propagandyści Putina, warto się zastanowić, co robisz nie tak.
Isabel Risques retweeted
A lack of spare parts for aircraft due to sanctions was a serious problem for Russia. Trump rushes to Putin’s rescue yet again, while Russia concedes nothing and continues to murder Ukrainian civilians.
The United States has lifted restrictions on the Boeing Corporation’s engagement with the Belarusian national airline, Belavia -Igor Cherginets, Director General of Belavia, as reported by the news agency BelTA.
The U.S. Department of Commerce has granted Boeing authorization to work with the Belarusian airline. "This will allow Belavia to directly obtain spare parts, components, and software for the aircraft currently in its fleet. Furthermore, it paves the way for negotiations regarding the direct acquisition of aircraft from Boeing. It is worth noting that a similar authorization had previously been issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which provided the technical framework for direct cooperation between Belavia and Boeing. A year ago, the U.S. government issued an authorization that removed all sanctions—specifically political sanctions—against Belavia," the airline’s Director General stated.
Isabel Risques retweeted
Ukrainian children murdered by russia in October 2026.
This was one of the deadliest months for Ukrainian children this year.
russia went on a rampage. And Trump and his administration helped make it possible.
The world must not forget.
Isabel Risques retweeted
Elon Musk deleted this video from X. It shows Republicans telling the truth about Trump before they teamed up with him. In the end, they sold out the whole world for money.
Isabel Risques retweeted
The situation in Poland is much simpler than all the talk of a “coup” suggests.
PiS, Jarosław Kaczyński’s party, which backed current President Karol Nawrocki, refused to recognise three lawfully elected Constitutional Tribunal judges back in 2015, together with then-President Andrzej Duda. Those judges were Roman Hauser, Andrzej Jakubecki and Krzysztof Ślebzak. PiS installed its own picks in their seats: Henryk Cioch, Lech Morawski and Mariusz Muszyński. Even after the Tribunal confirmed that the original three had been lawfully elected, PiS and Duda refused to respect its ruling. They put their own political interests above the court’s decision.
Yes, the previous PO–PSL coalition had also broken the rules by electing two additional judges before it was entitled to: Bronisław Sitek and Andrzej Sokala. But when the Tribunal ruled against those appointments, the coalition accepted the decision. Borys Budka even apologised on behalf of PO. PiS never complied with the ruling concerning the three lawfully elected judges. That difference matters. One side accepted an unfavourable ruling. The other refused to obey it.
The court’s membership changed over the years. Cioch and Morawski died in 2017 and were replaced by Jarosław Wyrembak and Justyn Piskorski. Muszyński’s nine-year term ended in December 2024. Other judges’ terms ended too. Seats became vacant, and new judges needed to be elected.
Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal judges are elected by the Sejm, the lower house of parliament, for nine-year terms. Donald Tusk’s governing coalition currently holds a majority there. That majority has the constitutional right to elect judges to fill those vacancies. PiS losing its parliamentary majority did not give it the right to block that process indefinitely.
The Sejm elected eight new judges. President Nawrocki accepted the oaths of three: Magdalena Bentkowska, Dariusz Szostek and Sławomir Patyra. But he refused to accept the oaths of the other five: Krystian Markiewicz, Maciej Taborowski, Marcin Dziurda, Anna Korwin-Piotrowska and Maciej Berek. They eventually took their oaths without him present, formally addressing them to the president.
The oath is required by law. But it does not give the president a personal veto over parliament’s choice of judges. He is required to accept their oaths. The Tribunal itself ruled on this back in 2015. In October 2026, the Venice Commission backed that interpretation and supported allowing judges to take their oaths without the president physically present if he blocks the process, provided the necessary formalities are followed.
Yet the leadership of the very same Tribunal where PiS had unlawfully installed its own judges refused to let the new judges do their jobs. The court’s president, Bogdan Święczkowski, insisted that they could not serve unless they took their oaths in Nawrocki’s presence. The president blocked the normal procedure, and the Tribunal’s leadership used that blockage to keep them out.
On October 30, Anna Korwin-Piotrowska announced the temporary suspension of Święczkowski and his deputy, Bartłomiej Sochański, and assumed leadership of the Tribunal. Lawyers dispute whether she had the legal authority to suspend them in that way. That specific step deserves legal scrutiny. It does not erase the obstruction that led to it.
I support Tusk’s efforts to end this obstruction, and I don’t buy the claims of a coup. PiS does not get to unlawfully install its own judges, refuse to respect court rulings, and then demand that everyone treat the situation it created as untouchable.
Tusk is right to push back. Judges elected by the Sejm should be allowed to do their jobs. The president has constitutional duties, not a personal veto over the court’s membership. And PiS has no permanent claim to Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal.
🤖 Made with AI
Isabel Risques retweeted
Dear MAGA, since you're always asking me, "What laws has Trump violated. Be specific."
HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE LIST
1) The Principle of Non-refoulement is an international law prohibiting a state from returning a person to a place where they would face a real risk of persecution, torture, or other serious harm.
SEE - 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, which the U.S ratified in 1968.
2) The Convention Against Torture (CAT) prohibits the removal of any person to a country where they would more likely than not be subjected to torture.
Signed by the U.S.: April 18, 1988
Ratified by the U.S.: October 21, 1994
Enforced in the U.S.: November 20, 1994
3) The Refugee Act of 1980 prohibits the return of a refugee to a country where their life or freedom would be threatened.
4) INA § 241(b)(3) states that the U.S. cannot remove an alien to a country if it's determines that the alien's life or freedom would be threatened in that country.
5) Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (FARRA) - codified 8 U.S.C. § 1231 - states the U.S can NOT expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture.
6) Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 (Election Clause) by attempting to control federal elections and intimidate State and election officials.
7) Article I, Section 8 - Congress' authority to create and/or abolish government agencies/offices - by creating DOGE via Executive Order and by dismantling government agencies WITHOUT Congressional approval or involvement.
8) Article I, Section 9 , Clause 8 - the Emoluments Clause - prohibits any person holding a government office from accepting any present, emolument , office, or title from any "King, Prince, or foreign State ," without congressional consent.
9) 1st Amendment free speech clause by silencing the scientific community - via Executive Order - and by trying to silence the media by kicking out certain media from the press room and by filing frivolous lawsuits.
10) 5th Amendment for violating due process rights of immigrants. Which is confirmed by the U.S Supreme Court in two separate rulings.
11) 10th Amendment by sending ICE agents into sanctuary cities.
Under Printz v. United State, the Federal government "may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program." — thus, protecting sanctuary cities.
12) 14th Amendment Section 1 - the birthright citizenship clause - by signing an Executive Order attempting to end the protections of birthright citizenship.
13) 5 USC § 403 by illegally firing 18 Inspectors General's from the Defense Department, State Department, Health and Human Services Department and the Department of Labor.
14) 8 USC § 1373, the courts have ruled that this law cannot compel local law enforcement to act as immigration agents.
15) 18 U.S.C. § 4 – Misprision of Felony, by "having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony" in regards to covering up the Epstein files.
16) 18 U.S. Code § 401 for blatantly ignoring and disobeying an immigration Court ruling, a U.S. District Court ruling, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruling. @realDonaldTrump and this regime have blatantly defied, disobeyed, and ignored FIVE federal court orders, thus far.
17) 18 U.S.C. § 1505 by "willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material" in regards to the Epstein files.
18) The Posse Comitatus Act by deploying active military armed forces on U.S. soil.
19) The War Powers Resolution Act by NOT consulting with Congress nor meeting the threshold in order to bomb Iran without consulting Congress.
This list does NOT include violations of international laws.
Isabel Risques retweeted
Hey @grok, who is wrong in the Polish constitutional court stand-off, and broke the law and the constitution? Prime Minister Tusk or President Nawrocki? You can choose only one, clear answer please, Tusk or Nawrocki?
Isabel Risques retweeted
Nawrocki.
The Constitution (Art. 194) gives the Sejm sole power to elect CT judges. The presidential oath is only a statutory formality, not a veto. Venice Commission confirms the President has no discretion to block or review Sejm elections. Nawrocki’s refusals created the deadlock by treating a ceremonial step as a constitutional barrier.
Isabel Risques retweeted
Dmitrij Miedwiediew, były prezydent Rosji, stwierdził, że w Polsce doszło do zamachu stanu, a “liberałowie Tuska, protegowanego Brukseli, uciskają konserwatystów z PiS”. I wszystko jasne.
Isabel Risques retweeted
What The Hell Is Happening In Poland? Let Me Explain 🇵🇱🇪🇺
For everyone outside Poland wondering what the hell is going on, especially after seeing all the dramatic posts about a supposed coup, you need to understand something about Polish politics.
I was born in Poland. I remember communism. I remember what Poland was like before it became the country it is today. And watching this political circus unfold is infuriating.
From 2015 to 2023, Poland was governed by Law and Justice (PiS), Jarosław Kaczyński’s national-conservative party. During those eight years, PiS pushed through controversial changes to the judicial system, including the Constitutional Tribunal, Poland’s equivalent of a constitutional court. Those changes triggered years of disputes with the European Union over judicial independence and the rule of law.
In 2023, Polish voters brought a new parliamentary majority to power, led by Donald Tusk. His coalition promised to repair the damage and restore the independence of Poland’s institutions. But there was a problem. PiS had left behind people in powerful judicial positions, and the presidency became another obstacle to those reforms.
Fast-forward to October 30, 2026. A judge announced the suspension of Constitutional Tribunal president Bogdan Święczkowski, a PiS-era appointee who had refused to seat judges elected by the current parliamentary majority. The legality of that suspension is now disputed.
President Karol Nawrocki, a nationalist closely aligned with PiS, interrupted his trip to Africa, returned to Warsaw, and accused the government of attempting a coup. Police were deployed, protesters gathered, and the entire situation exploded across social media.
Now, here’s the part many people outside Poland don’t understand.
This confrontation didn’t suddenly appear out of nowhere. It’s the continuation of a constitutional crisis that began more than a decade ago. The current government says it is trying to restore the rule of law. PiS and Nawrocki say the government is violating it. The courts and legal procedures, not social-media hysteria, must ultimately determine what is lawful.
And then there’s Nawrocki himself.
Just days ago, a former coworker from the Grand Hotel in Sopot testified in court that Nawrocki had suggested she could earn extra money by bringing women to hotel guests. She described an incident that made her suspect he was involved in procuring prostitutes. Nawrocki denies the allegations and has sued the publisher that reported them. No court has established that he engaged in pimping, but the testimony is real, public, and deeply serious.
There have also been controversies surrounding his past involvement in an arranged fight and his acquisition of an apartment.
And while all this is happening, Kaczyński and his political allies are escalating their confrontational rhetoric about the European Union.
Here’s something they should remember: according to a 2026 CBOS survey, 82% of Poles support Poland remaining in the EU.
Eighty-two percent.
Poland has benefited enormously from European integration, investment, infrastructure development, freedom of movement, and access to the European market. Anyone who remembers Poland before 1989 can appreciate just how extraordinary its transformation has been.
Now, I’m not claiming every criticism of the EU means someone wants to leave it. But I am deeply concerned about politicians who repeatedly turn European institutions into enemies while presenting themselves as Poland’s only true patriots.
And I’m equally concerned about how easily this political confrontation can be exploited by Russian propaganda. Moscow benefits when European societies distrust their democratic institutions, fight among themselves, and turn against European cooperation. That doesn’t prove every inflammatory post is Russian propaganda. It means we should be extremely careful about who is spreading what, and why.
I have absolutely no patience for nationalism dressed up as patriotism, especially in a country that knows what Russian domination looks like.
Poland fought too hard to escape Moscow’s influence and build its place in democratic Europe.
Patriotism is not loyalty to Kaczyński, Nawrocki, Tusk, or any political party. Patriotism is loyalty to Poland, its Constitution, its democratic institutions, and its people.
And no politician should be above the law.
Here is a video of very aggressive Polish President Nawrocki forcing his way into Constitutional Tribunal pushing woman aside. His old instincts of hooliganism and pimp is kicking in.
Isabel Risques retweeted
While Europe promises to stand with Ukraine without taking consequent action, and the US stands with Russia by handicapping Ukraine’s defenses, Russia continues to target and murder Ukrainian civilians every day. Each one also symbolizes the death of the free world order.
A Russian drone hit two trains stopped at a station in central Ukraine, killing at least 13 people and injuring 10 others, officials said. apnews.com/article/russia-uk…
