Content creator & mod in Web3. I share ideas, build community, and help projects grow. AMB / Verify on CMC @Coinmarketcap Open for collab.
Joined October 2023
- Tweets30.7K
- Following8.4K
- Followers9.9K
- Likes42.3K
Pinned Tweet
๐๐ซ๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ค๐๐๐ฉ๐ฌ ๐๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ : โ๐๐ก๐ข๐๐ก ๐๐ก๐๐ข๐ง ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ญ๐?โ
But thatโs not the real question.
The real question is:
Which privacy architecture can scale into the regulated world without breaking?
๐ ๐๐ก๐ซ๐๐๐ ๐งต
#Concordium
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐๐๐ซ ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐จ๐๐ฌ๐ง'๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ค๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐๐๐.
๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ, ๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฌ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฉ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ.
๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐จ๐ง'๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก @Concordium ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ก๐ซ๐๐ซ-๐๐ข๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ณ๐ค๐ข.
Ethereum's planned Glamsterdam upgrade brings performance into the discussion, including the promise of improving how blockchain systems operate.
Better infrastructure matters, especially if more applications and AI agents begin using it.
But faster transactions alone cannot answer every question about trust and responsibility.
What happens when an autonomous agent makes a purchase it wasn't supposed to make?
How does another system know that the agent is authorized?
Concordium's emphasis on verified identity offers a useful counterpoint to the usual obsession with speed.
The agentic economy may need better roads, but it also needs reliable ways to establish responsibility.
For everyday users, that distinction could matter more than any technical benchmark.
Nobody celebrates a fast payment when it goes to the wrong person.
What should blockchain builders prioritize next performance, privacy, or accountability?
#web3
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
It's refreshing to see that building something like a prediction market doesn't always have to cost so much or be so difficult.
@GenLayer is making this process easier and giving developers more room to bring their ideas to life.
Sometimes, making things simpler is a big step forward.
Explore what GenLayer is building: portal.genlayer.foundation/
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
Once staking opens, your staked GEN is a speedometer, not an odometer.
It tells you your points-per-day rate, not the points you've already earned.
I'm sharing this for a Rally campaign and may earn a reward.
With @GenLayer, each staked GEN earns 1 Staking Point per day. From THE DAY, an unclaimed airdrop counts automatically while locked.
Suppose the programme runs for at least 30 days and your unclaimed 400 GEN airdrop stays locked from THE DAY throughout.
After day 12, you add 200 GEN in the Portal and keep it staked for the remaining 18 days.
The 400 GEN earns 12,000 points. The extra 200 earns 3,600. Total: 15,600.
Multiplying today's 600 GEN balance by all 30 days gives 18,000, but that counts the extra 200 for days it wasn't staked.
Extra Portal stake can be withdrawn at any time. The unclaimed airdrop in this example remains locked.
The live leaderboard is a preview. At mainnet, Foundation-backed node seats are allocated in proportion to points, subject to eligibility.
One requirement: a node running on Clarke for at least 30 days. You can run it yourself or use a service partner.
I'd want to see how each addition contributed, not just today's balance. Would you prefer a single points total or a breakdown by stake start date? Why?
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
Traditional commodity markets meeting crypto-native trading infrastructure. ๐
@EVEDEX has introduced Natural Gas $NATGAS perpetuals, bringing commodity price exposure into its growing trading ecosystem.
What's worth noting:
- Natural Gas perpetual market access.
- Self-custodial trading infrastructure.
-On-chain trading.
- Up to 100x leverage.
The interesting development here is the broader range of markets becoming accessible through crypto-native platforms.
It's not just about adding another trading pair. It's about expanding what users can access within a single trading ecosystem.
Another interesting development from EVEDEX.
New Listing: $NATGAS
Natural Gas perps are now live on EVEDEX with up to 100x leverage.
Self-custodial. On-chain. Two clicks to open.
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
.@IPXExchange brings up an interesting question about how creative projects should handle capital.
Traditional fundraising often focuses heavily on getting the money secured. But securing funding is only one part of the problem.
What happens after the money arrives?
Does the project have clearly defined milestones? How is progress tracked? What ensures that allocated funds are used for their intended purpose?
These are important questions, especially when multiple contributors and investors are involved.
One aspect of IPX I find particularly interesting is its milestone-based escrow approach.
Instead of treating project funding as one unrestricted pool, the model introduces a structure where capital allocation can be connected to specific project milestones.
Combine that with tokenized participation, transparent onchain transactions and a broader network of creators and distribution partners, and you begin to see the infrastructure thesis.
The interesting part isnโt simply moving creative financing onto blockchain.
Itโs introducing better coordination and accountability into a process that traditionally involves several disconnected parties.
Of course, the effectiveness ultimately depends on how milestones are verified and how disputes are handled.
Can milestone-based funding become a better standard for financing creative projects, or does it introduce too much friction for creators?
Thatโs one technical question Iโd love to see IPX answer as the ecosystem develops.
ipx.exchange/
๐ค Paid partnership
.@IPXExchange is addressing an interesting problem in the creative economy: fragmentation.
A creator might have the intellectual property, another party might have the capital, an agency might handle distribution, and a completely different organisation might manage sponsorships.
The problem is that these participants often operate in disconnected systems.
This creates friction around ownership, funding, collaboration and revenue distribution.
What I find interesting about IPX is its attempt to bring these different participants into a connected ecosystem.
Rather than treating intellectual property as a single asset that gets tokenized and forgotten, the model considers what happens throughout its commercial lifecycle.
Creators can develop projects, access funding mechanisms, establish membership structures and connect with distribution partners.
Thereโs also an important infrastructure layer here.
Smart contracts, tokenization and milestone-based fund management can introduce more transparency into how project resources are allocated and how participation is structured.
But the bigger opportunity goes beyond the technology itself.
Itโs about making intellectual property easier to finance, develop and commercialise without requiring every creator to build an entire business infrastructure from scratch.
I think this is where IPX has an interesting thesis.
Could intellectual property become a more accessible asset class if the infrastructure around its creation and commercialisation became simpler?
Thatโs a question worth exploring.
ipx.exchange/
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
Vibe coding is starting to look like a lot more than just a faster way to write code
A few recent updates worth knowing about:
ยป Cursor can now build and publish live apps, handling the database, authentication and hosting along the way. It also introduced real time voice conversations with coding agents.
ยป GitHub Copilot Fusion can route work across different models depending on the task. Assisted permissions also let agents move through clearly safe actions without asking for approval every time
ยป Replitโs Monitoring Agent can investigate problems in published apps, validate fixes and even deploy them automatically if you enable it
ยป Codex has expanded beyond code generation, with computer use, browser workflows and multiple agents working in parallel
What stands out across these updates is how much of the development process AI tools are starting to handle
You can go from an idea to a working app, publish it and have agents help maintain it afterward
Of course, thereโs still plenty that needs human review. Getting something to work is one thing. Making sure it keeps working is another
Which part of the development process would you actually trust an AI agent to handle on its own?
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
In crypto, timing can make a bigger difference than most people realize.
Especially when a new token launches.
By the time many traders notice a new liquidity pool and submit their buy transactions, the earliest opportunities may already be gone.
This is where @Hypesium takes an interesting approach.
Built specifically for Elysium, Hypesium focuses on first-block execution.
Elysium produces blocks every 100ms and operates without a public mempool.
Hypesium prepares the route, calldata and gas in advance, so when a pool creation event arrives, the transaction is ready to move.
The team states that its hot execution path takes under 5ms.
The goal is simple:
Be ready before the competition catches up.
For anyone interested in new token launches, execution speed is not just a technical detail. It can be a major part of the trading strategy.
That's what makes Hypesium worth watching.
A trading ecosystem becomes more interesting when its referral system rewards more than just direct invitations.
@Hypesium has built a multi-level referral program around its Telegram trading bot.
Here's what makes it interesting:
โ 10% lifetime trading fee discount for people joining through your referral.
โ 30% of their trading fees as your base referral reward.
โ Up to 40% during the launch month.
โ Up to 45% depending on your rank.
And it doesn't stop at direct referrals.
The program includes five levels:
Level 1: 30%โ45%
Level 2: 6%
Level 3: 3%
Level 4: 2%
Level 5: 1%
Rewards are distributed daily in HYPE.
There is also cashback on your own trading volume and weekly prizes for the top three referrers.
What I find interesting is the combination of trading utility and community incentives.
Instead of focusing only on bringing new users, Hypesium connects referrals with actual trading activity.
That's a different approach to building an ecosystem.
Reefer Link : t.me/Hypesium_bot?start=ref_โฆ
Join Starlist:starlist.world/r/onyx__Fury
@starlisting
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
One of the biggest challenges in on-chain trading isn't finding a token. It is knowing which launches deserve your attention.
New tokens appear quickly information is scattered and traders often spend more time searching than analyzing.
That is where tools like @Hypesium come in.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ?
That's the vision behind @infoagent7io seven specialized agents working together across strategy, research, creation, development, execution, review, and growth.
One goal. Seven minds. Coordinated intelligence.
#Web3
14
591
๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐๐๐ซ ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐จ๐๐ฌ๐ง'๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ค๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐๐๐.
๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ, ๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฌ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฉ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ.
๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐จ๐ง'๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก @Concordium ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ก๐ซ๐๐ซ-๐๐ข๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ณ๐ค๐ข.
Ethereum's planned Glamsterdam upgrade brings performance into the discussion, including the promise of improving how blockchain systems operate.
Better infrastructure matters, especially if more applications and AI agents begin using it.
But faster transactions alone cannot answer every question about trust and responsibility.
What happens when an autonomous agent makes a purchase it wasn't supposed to make?
How does another system know that the agent is authorized?
Concordium's emphasis on verified identity offers a useful counterpoint to the usual obsession with speed.
The agentic economy may need better roads, but it also needs reliable ways to establish responsibility.
For everyday users, that distinction could matter more than any technical benchmark.
Nobody celebrates a fast payment when it goes to the wrong person.
What should blockchain builders prioritize next performance, privacy, or accountability?
#web3
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
You canโt retrofit trust into AI agents. ๐ค
As agents gain autonomy, identity and accountability need to be part of the infrastructure from day one.
Not something we figure out after things go wrong.
๐ฅ More from Town Hall #6 ๐
youtu.be/dtJiWOz-mvU
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
5 million industrial robots are now working in factories worldwide, after more than 600,000 were installed in 2025 alone (IFR World Robotics 2026).
The robots are already here. The skills to program, fix and improve them are the gap.
Here's a free learning path, in order:
1. Universal Robots Academy: program a cobot in a browser simulator
โ universal-robots.com/academy
2. ROS 2 Documentation: the framework most robot software is built on
โ docs.ros.org
3. Modern Robotics (Northwestern): free textbook, lectures and code by Kevin Lynch and Frank Park
โ modernrobotics.org
4. MIT Underactuated Robotics: Russ Tedrake's notes on the maths behind motion
โ underactuated.mit.edu
5. Hugging Face Robotics Course: how robots learn from data with LeRobot
โ huggingface.co/learn/roboticโฆ
6. NVIDIA Physical AI Learning: train in simulation, then run on a real arm
โ docs.nvidia.com/learning/phyโฆ
7. IFR World Robotics: where the market numbers come from
โ ifr.org
One Lean rule before any of it: automate a broken process and you just move the waste faster. Fix the flow first.
Which one are you starting with?
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
Imagine finding an NFT you like and being able to buy it for a friend without going through a separate transfer process.
That's a small feature, but I like the thinking behind it.
@VelixoMarket is making NFT collecting more accessible, with support for both fogo and Robinhood Chain.
You can buy an NFT and send it directly to another wallet in one step on Robinhood Chain, while still enjoying the Fogo marketplace.
With $VLX also becoming part of the ecosystem, I'm interested to see how Velixo develops from here.
Sometimes, making things easier for users is what makes a platform stand out.
Happy Sunday everyone!
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
how to make good posts on x
this guide is tailored to the new algo update
the play: clear hook > useful body > real proof > cut the filler
> what changed
- like: 0.66 > 0.708
- time spent: 0.006 > 0.0075
- share: 2 > 2.118
- opening a post: 0.3 > 0.274
- reading time after opening: 0.4 > 0.385
- opening a video: 0.02 > 0
- "not interested": -52.272 > -53.07
> what those numbers actually mean
- x predicts what each viewer might do, then applies these weights
- they aren't points you collect for every like or reply
- a higher reading time weight doesn't mean your next post gets 25% more reach
> how i'd use this
- line 1: say exactly what the reader gets
- line 2: show the result, screenshot or fact that backs it up
- after "show more": deliver the steps you promised
- remove the intro that repeats the hook in 4 different ways
- show the catch before someone wastes their time or money
> for video
- show what the video is about immediately
- cut the logo intro and "wait till the end"
- video open weight hitting 0 doesn't mean videos get 0 reach. it's one signal, not the whole ranking system
> for replies
- add a missing step, a number or a useful counterpoint
- "huge", "this changes everything" and a rewritten version of the post add nothing
- write something the author can actually respond to
> the catch
- these point informations are from github
- experiments with different formats
- none of this guarantees views
- a bad topic doesn't become useful because you formatted it correctly
> what not to do
- don't stretch 3 useful lines into 30 to farm reading time
- don't ask people to like your post because the like weight increased (e4e groups)
- don't turn every trending topic into your niche
- don't read one weight and invent a growth hack around it
a hook gets someone to open the post. the rest needs to justify it
bookmark this, rewrite your whole strategy & print views
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
๐จ What if you could earn DeFi yield without exposing your wallet balance?
I explored @primus_labs Confidential Finance dApp on BNB Chain.
Hereโs what caught my attention:
๐ฐ 10.54% APY on eU & eUSDT vaults
๐ $47.55M Unitas protocol TVL
๐ฆ $50.39M backing reserves
๐ Encrypted transfers & private positions powered by FHE
โฝ Shield fee: 0.00036 BNB
Real DeFi yield + financial privacy.
Want to explore Primus and its Kaito campaign?
๐ My link is in the reply!
WEB3 HAS A FAKE METRICS PROBLEM ๐จ
The numbers are crazy.
๐ 51 major airdrops analyzed in 2026
๐ค 11% of claimers linked to wallet farms in the median drop
๐ธ One coordinated group captured 87% of the ROBO airdrop!
Fake activity. Misleading analytics. Real users losing rewards.
Hereโs where @primus_labs comes in. ๐งต
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
Staking Points are GEN times days. That's the whole formula, and it hides a trade.
The rate is one point per GEN per day, the same for any amount.
So 1,000 GEN held for 30 days earns 30,000 points. 30,000 GEN held for one day earns the same 30,000.
Amount and time trade one for one.
Two other rules decide who can use that.
An airdrop allocation counts as staked from THE DAY, even unclaimed and locked, and it earns points the whole time.
Extra GEN staked through the Portal earns at the same daily rate, and it can be withdrawn at any time.
Points start on THE DAY, not on the announcement date.
Every point lands on a live leaderboard on the Portal. It shows where a wallet would stand if the program ended that day, and it decides the node seats.
When mainnet arrives, winners start as validators, backed by the Foundation's GEN.
@GenLayer ranks those seats by points that come from two inputs: how much, and how long.
If you held an allocation, which lever would you pull: more GEN, or more days?
๐ค Paid partnership
๐๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ง ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐ง๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฉ๐ฌ. ๐๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ค ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ, ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐จ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐๐ฒ.
๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ง๐ข๐๐ง๐ญ, ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ?
๐๐จ๐ฐ ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ฌ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐๐.
Suddenly, the question isn't how intelligent it is. The question is who takes responsibility.
That tension is what makes Paul Barron's conversation with @Concordium CEO Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki worth discussing.
AI agents are moving from answering questions toward taking actions. But speed and independence create new problems when nobody can confidently identify who stands behind an agent.
Concordium's focus on verified identity brings a different perspective to the conversation.
It suggests that trust needs to be designed into automated systems, not added after something goes wrong.
I keep thinking about how ordinary people might experience this shift.
A shop owner won't ask whether a payment uses fashionable technology. They'll ask whether it is safe, traceable, and accountable.
That's a much more human question than it first appears.
Would you let an AI assistant spend your money without asking first?
#Web3
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
You ask an AI agent to buy BTC. It replies "Done."
But how do you know it actually happened?
AI agents are getting better at taking action: placing orders, posting content and fetching data. But a text reply or screenshot isn't always enough to prove what really happened
This is where @primus_labs gets interesting
With zkTLS, agents can generate cryptographic attestations for data from websites and APIs. Apps can then verify the source and check specific details without exposing sensitive information
Here's what makes it practical
โข Binance Verifiable Skills bring some Binance API calls into a zkTLS proof workflow
โข The Primus plugin for ElizaOS supports verification of LLM inference, agent actions and external data
โข Sensitive information can stay private while relevant results are verified
The shift is simple
From "the agent said it did the job" to "here's the proof."
As AI agents start handling real money, verifiable execution could become a basic requirement
Would you trust an AI agent with your funds if its actions came with cryptographic proofs?
Every stablecoin says it's fully backed. But how can you actually verify that?
Usually, you get a periodic report from an auditor. It's a snapshot in time, and the numbers may change long before the next report comes out
@primus_labs is approaching this problem differently.
With zkTLS, offchain balances can be verified directly from authentic exchange APIs, without exposing login credentials or sensitive account details
In May 2026, Primus teamed up with Unitas and Brevis to bring this approach to real-time Proof of Reserves for USDu
Here's why it matters:
โข Offchain collateral can be checked continuously
โข zkTLS verifies the source of the data
โข Brevis uses zkVM to prove the reserve calculations
โข Sensitive account details stay private
The interesting part is that users don't have to rely only on a number published by the protocol. They can verify the cryptographic proof behind it
That's a meaningful step toward more transparent and trust minimized finance
Would you trust a stablecoin more if its reserves could be verified continuously instead of waiting for an audit report?
Namoo๐ฆ
retweeted
New game mode added to their vast collection by @Duelbits which you can try out here yourself
๐duel.bz/4BMLqlr
