JGGCDN (@JGGCDN) header
JGGCDN (@JGGCDN) profile picture

📈 Microcap hunter with systems level view of Canada’s resource economy, low tolerance for institutional theater, self aware outsider with a sense of humour.

Canada
Joined May 2021
Photo by JGGCDN (@JGGCDN)Photo by JGGCDN (@JGGCDN)Photo by JGGCDN (@JGGCDN)Photo by JGGCDN (@JGGCDN)Photo by JGGCDN (@JGGCDN)Photo by JGGCDN (@JGGCDN)Photo by JGGCDN (@JGGCDN)Photo by JGGCDN (@JGGCDN)
It’s about understanding what needs to happen for you to earn a worthwhile return, how realistic those expectations are, and how much room you have to be wrong. -- Rose Celine Investments In a nutshell, I agree 100%. I invested in small caps for more than 3 decades. I deal with anticipation of positive catalysts and better financial statements. How much time is needed for me to be wrong or right? Where do I draw the line, profit or loss, rebalance and move on.
The Price of Being Right Before buying a stock, try to explain how you could lose money even if you’re right about the company. It’s a simple question, but one that forces you to think about something a wonderful business can easily hide. How much of its future success are you already paying for? Imagine a company earning $1 per share with a stock price of $50. Over the next five years, earnings double to $2, growing 15% annually. You understood the business correctly, management delivered, and everything went according to plan. Yet if investors are only willing to pay 25 times earnings five years later, the stock is still worth $50. The business doubled its earnings, but your investment went nowhere. You were right about the business, but that didn’t make you any money. And this happens far more often than investors realize. This doesn’t mean you should avoid paying a premium for wonderful businesses. Some companies can grow at extraordinary rates for decades, making what initially looks expensive turn out to be a bargain. But finding a great business is only part of the work. You still have to figure out what makes it a great investment at the price you’re paying. Let’s take that same $50 stock and assume you want to earn 12% annually over the next five years. Your investment would need to grow to $88. If the market values the company at 25 times earnings at that point, earnings per share would need to reach $3.52. That requires 29% annual earnings growth instead of 15%. Now you have something much more useful to think about. Can this business realistically grow earnings at 29% annually for five years? Where will that growth come from? More customers, higher prices, better margins, share repurchases, or some combination of all four? And remember, we’re talking about earnings per share, not simply total profits. A company can grow its profits substantially while issuing so many new shares that individual shareholders receive considerably less of that growth. What matters is how much of that growing business ultimately belongs to you. Of course, nobody knows what multiple investors will pay five years from now. That’s why I think it’s important to consider several reasonable outcomes rather than getting attached to one prediction. If your investment only works when everything goes right and investors are still willing to pay a premium five years later, you should understand just how much you’re counting on. This is also why patience is such an enormous advantage. You can admire a business, study it for years, appreciate everything management is doing, and still decide that the price makes little sense. You don’t have to own every wonderful company you come across, and there’s nothing wrong with waiting. I’ve always believed that valuation isn’t about coming up with an impressive price target or pretending you can predict the future. It’s about understanding what needs to happen for you to earn a worthwhile return, how realistic those expectations are, and how much room you have to be wrong. Because being right about a business and making money from its stock are two very different things. 🌹
1
2
204
The recent Canadian budget could have super charged the Canadian public markets with one small adjustment.
4
1
14
2,929
Cameron’s being way too modest. @PaulAndreola & plenty of other microcap investors consider him one of the few "no BS" voices consistently doing real work for the community. #97 on Substack Rising is just the market noticing what many of us already know.
Basically a participation ribbon - but I'll take it 👍 microcapstocks.substack.com/
4
363
January 2025: Trump’s tariffs would force Canada to stop treating the U.S. as its only customer and actually build coastal pipelines. November 2026: Budget 2026 just named Pacific Link a project of national interest for exactly that reason. The institutional theater finally caught up to the economics.
Replying to @JGGCDN
Title: Trump's Tariff Threat Spurs Canadian Pipeline Expansion to Global Markets. In a surprising turn of events, the looming threat of a 25% tariff on Canadian goods by U.S. President Donald Trump has ignited discussions about expanding Canada's pipeline infrastructure to reach its coastal regions. This move could fundamentally alter the dynamics of Canadian energy exports, potentially ending the discounted sales to the U.S. and opening up global markets at market prices.
4
405
Canada needs to start building again. We need more homes, electricity, trade infrastructure, skilled workers & industrial capacity. The direction makes sense. The real question is whether Canada can execute. We’re already short on electricians, welders, engineers & project managers. If that doesn’t change, announcing billions could just make everything more expensive. The government also has to make smart investments. How should we judge them? Did private investors put in real money? Was the project finished on time and on budget? Did it create lasting jobs, exports & tax revenue, or does it still need government support years later? Borrowing makes sense if it leaves Canada more productive & Canadians better off. Businesses get the tax benefits now. Workers are promised better wages later. We need to see those gains actually reach people. Forget the money announced, watch the results. Homes built Electricity connected Faster approvals Exports growing Wages beating inflation If Canada delivers, Budget 2026 could be a real economic reset, if not, we’ll be left with the debt & none of the growth that was supposed to pay for it.
Lower costs. A stronger economy. The freedom to live our lives as we choose.
3
1
13
799
Latest substack article "Quick Update & Opinions on Q3 Earnings Season" microcapstocks.substack.com/…
2
4
758
A brutal month for most hedge funds. Here's our longest list so far
31
127
23
1,184
229,186
Just a bit of my thoughts on the AI datacenter buildout: Texas has already stopped new data centers back in August, and that's the most important fact the market missed today. 1/ Abbott paused it in August. ERCOT stopped energizing new data centers of 75 MW or more and shelved a ~200 GW study batch. TCEQ stopped issuing permits. Hinojosa's moratorium will keep the existing pause in place on New permits instead of lifting it. She also said it targets new permits, not projects already under construction. So that just means next project goes to a friendly locale, not Texas. 2/ Ohio was already moving. DeWine froze the data center sales-tax exemption for new projects back in June. Acton's conditional moratorium is a pay your own power costs, use union labor, build on brownfields. That's a cost hit, not a ban outright. 3/ Congress can't ban anything. The Sanders/AOC moratorium bill would face a Trump veto through Jan 2029. 4/ What's already built or nearly built keeps going:
• Stargate Abilene: 4 of 8 buildings live, the rest due this month
• Fairwater Atlanta: ~636 MW running
• Rainier Indiana: ~1 GW running
• Hyperion Louisiana: not in play at all
About 56.7 GW is under construction nationally and largely outside the pledges. 5/ Demand didn't change this week:
• $ANET Q3 revenue $3.66b, +58.5% y/y, $360m above guide
• $CLS guiding 2027 to $40b, roughly double 2026
• $MOD data center sales +95%, record backlog, a $4b+ deal for 2027–29
• Hyperscalers are on pace for $803b–$828b of 2026 capex and they're guiding 2027 higher 6/ The market half-figured it out. Texas-heavy builders and power names fell 7–23% ($HUT -23%, $VST -15%). Suppliers with national backlogs barely moved ($ANET -0.4%, $NVDA -0.8%). $NUAI is a zero now for sure. 7/ Where it's real: new 2027–28 capacity in TX/OH/GA gets slower and pricier, so it will shift to different locations. New projects go to friendly locales, TX/OH/GA lose out. 8/ AI component suppliers are still maxed out for the next few years, that demand doesn’t change, just where they ship it to does. 9/ Neoclouds still suck. Ain’t nothing gonna change that.
14
25
1
239
40,906
Q3 earnings has been strong so far. Reklaim $MYID.V BioRem $BRM.V Thinkific $THNC.TO Propel $PRL.TO are all crushing it today. We haven't seen consistently 'winning' earnings since 2024 🔥
3
2
26
2,106
Recipe for an outperforming microcap: ✅Recent inflection to profitability ✅Accelerating growth ✅Improving operating leverage ✅Buying back stock ✅Multiple expansion Happening in real-time w/ $MYID.V
1
6
3
43
4,130
Does BC currently provide any significant discretionary incentives (revenue sharing in forestry/gaming/clean energy) beyond strict Section 35 obligations? Are those mostly controlled by leadership rather than community members? Would a government pause bring indigenous leadership to the table?
Grand Chief Stewart Phillip: "My fundamental message to corporations is 'buyer beware' when you invest in BC, because we are not standing down, we are not stepping back."
2
2
450
Reklaim LTD FINS Review "Mic Drop" : $MYID.V $MYIDF "With a revenue increase of 187% along with 40% net income margin, perhaps you can say they “mic dropped” these Q3 numbers." #FinsDontLie
1
4
1
10
3,048
Reklaim $MYID.V is crushing it 👍 Revenue of $3.16M up 187% and net income of $1.27M with buybacks. The first 'winner' of Q3 earnings season as this should get rewarded: pro.ceo.ca/@newsfile/reklaim…
4
26
1,492
I've lived being mocked and bullied for being too quiet. My brothers were too, simply for being different. What many people didn't understand was that I was the son of Chinese immigrants who were trying to build a life in a new country. My parents worked hard, took care of their family, and dealt with challenges that most people never saw. Like many immigrant families, we learned to keep our heads down and keep moving forward. I was shy. I was a black sheep. I spent years observing more than talking. Looking back, that wasn't necessarily a weakness. Over time, I learned that not every thought needs to be spoken and not every argument needs to be won. I learned to listen, observe, and speak when I actually had something worth saying. Patience taught me as much as experience ever did. I try my best to be genuine, honest, and kind. Sometimes too kind. Sometimes too honest. That's just who I am. The older I get, the less interested I am in impressing people and the more interested I am in understanding them. Everyone is fighting battles you may know nothing about. At the end of the day, I wish people well on their journey. We don't have to agree on everything. We don't have to walk the same path. What matters is treating people with respect. Respect is never demanded.
Just because a person has a gorgeous heart and gentle nature doesn't mean they're naive or fragile. You never know the kind of chaos they tolerated to become that calm. Don't mistake kindness for weakness...those ppl have survived the hardest battles—they're smart and strong af.
2
1
5
474
$CLS.TO is selling off on AI capex fears, but I’m not seeing data centre demand actually slow down yet. Management guided 2027 revenue to $40B (up 90%) & adjusted EPS to $21.50, they’re saying customer forecasts are already higher for 2028. Industry data still shows record low vacancies (around 1.4% in primary NA markets) & high pre leasing of what’s under construction. The real bottlenecks look like power interconnect queues, transformer & switchgear lead times (still 80–160+ weeks), & specialized labour, not a drop in orders. Hiring remains active. At roughly $349, CLS.TO is trading near 12× 2027 EPS target. The risks around capital intensity & executing the ramp are fair, but the demand evidence just doesn’t support a slowdown yet.
3
1
6
1,071