Pinned Tweet
This is all you need to know about divorce … the child becomes the victim and if DA is involved then the child is used to punish the true victim … in most cases this is true, call it what you want but the law needs to recognise it and act FAST
Jools retweeted
Imagine you are a dental hygienist and live in Sweden..
You are employed to help “migrant children” with their dental issues.
As part of your job you examine the wisdom teeth development of the kids and you notice that 80% of those “kids” have fully formed wisdom teeth, implying they are not kids at all but adults older than the age of 18.
You tell the Swedish Migration Agency and they advise you to put it in writing.
When you send exact details, with examples of specific patients you are suspended, investigated and fired for disclosing private information relating to patients.
This happened to Bernt Herlitz in 2017.
When he appealed the unfair dismissal he ultimately lost and was fined about $50,000.
He and his family faced financial hardship and almost lost their home, until some generous benefactors raised money for him. Bernt remains unemployed today, despite staff shortages for dentists in his area in Gotland.
At the time, Sweden scoffed at the tests and claimed they were “discriminatory” but since then they have quietly brought in mass dental testing, for those whose age is in doubt, by the National Board of Forensic Medicine.
Bernt deserves a medal. Not vilification and unemployment.
Jools retweeted
Channel 4 Dispatches went undercover inside the Financial Ombudsman Service @financialombuds. What they filmed should have shut the place down.
Their own staff said this on camera:
"I'm not proud to admit it but I've done it myself. Just taken a chance and just slung stuff through, with any old decision."
"You're more likely to meet your targets if you're not upholding them."
11,000 cases fell into a black hole for two years. Some of those letters said "I am going to lose my house."
@UKParliament demanded answers. Baroness Ros Altmann called it shocking. MPs threatened a full inquiry.
FOS said the footage was "not representative."
Nothing changed.
Fast forward to today. My own complaint against @rsagroup / @IntactInsurance is now being formally handled by Gary Smith @G8GWS of @MeridianLegals.
Gary is the lawyer leading the FOS Litigation Group, a group built on over 1,000 documented FOS failures. He is preparing a judicial review of the FOS.
My case has been submitted by Meridian as my regulated representative because what happened to me fits the same pattern Channel 4 filmed.
If you have had a complaint dismissed by the FOS and you believe it was handled without proper scrutiny, contact Gary directly at Meridian Legal Services.
0121 516 0675
@MeridianLegals
The full transcript of what @C4Dispatches filmed inside the FOS is in the comments.
Read it and tell me this is not exactly what is still happening today.
Jools retweeted
All of us at Marvel Studios are deeply saddened by the passing of Sir Patrick Stewart. Sir Patrick brought Professor Charles Xavier to life with extraordinary grace, intelligence, and humanity, defining the character for generations of fans, from "X-Men" to "Logan" to "Avengers: Doomsday." He was a singular talent, a generous collaborator, and a true gentleman. Our hearts go out to his wife Sunny, his children, his friends, and the countless fans around the world whose lives he touched with his art.
Jools retweeted
Sparkbrook, Birmingham.
Talk about importing the third world and becoming the third world.
Jools retweeted
Unpopular opinion, but I believe groceries would be cheaper if 30 million illegal immigrants stopped getting them for free! Who else agrees with me on this?
Jools retweeted
🚨BREAKING: SECRET £150 MILLION FOR MIGRANTS
They didn't mention it in the budget today
But tucked away in the small print
"The Government have set aside a further £150 million for large scale asylum seeker accommodation"
All paid for by the British Taxpayer
ABSOLUTE DISGRACE
Jools retweeted
Replying to @PolitlcsUK
@UKLabour have now given £10b to Ukraine as the people of Britain suffer the worst cost of living crisis & national debt in recent history
No negotiation of peace just constant war & conflict
Europe is destroying itself while our politicians play dangerous games at the expense of our economy & children's future
Jools retweeted
A great rant from a friend:
“I don't know who's running the British newspapers at the moment, but I reckon somebody's accidentally given the editorial jobs to a bunch of fucking doomsday preppers.
Have you seen the absolute state of the news lately?
World War Three. Nuclear Armageddon. Russian cyberattacks. Chinese hackers. Emergency survival kits. How to prepare for the end of civilisation.
Every bloody newspaper seems to be running the same story.
You'd think Vladimir Putin had been spotted at Dover services with a tank and a packed lunch.
And apparently, the most important thing we can do to prepare for all this is go shopping.
Seriously.
We're being advised to stockpile food, water, torches, batteries and enough toilet roll to survive the collapse of Western civilisation.
Do they genuinely believe we're all going to read these articles, leap off the sofa and charge down to Asda like there's a fucking trolley dash on?
I reckon somebody's looked at the Christmas retail figures and thought, "How can we get these bastards to spend another two hundred quid?"
"Tell them the Russians are coming."
"Brilliant. We'll shift those seventeen pallets of corned beef we've had sitting in the warehouse since Easter."
And what exactly am I supposed to do with all these emergency supplies if there's a nuclear attack?
Imagine it.
You're sitting in your living room, minding your own business, when suddenly there's an enormous flash outside.
The windows explode. The roof comes off. There's a nuclear shockwave tearing through the city, flattening everything in its path.
And there you are, crawling across the kitchen floor, desperately trying to get the fucking tin opener out of the drawer.
"QUICK! SOMEBODY GET THE BEANS!"
What fucking difference are beans going to make?
You're about to be vaporised at several thousand degrees. I don't think the nutritional benefits of baked beans are going to be particularly relevant.
But the politicians are the funniest part of all this.
Angela Rayner was asked what she'd be stockpiling.
Sauvignon Blanc and mascara.
Sauvignon Blanc and fucking mascara!
I love that.
The world's coming to an end, millions could die, civilisation might collapse, but Angela's making sure she's got a decent bottle of white and her eyelashes done.
Then Andy Burnham comes along telling people not to stockpile alcohol because they need to keep a clear head.
Well, thank Christ we've got that sorted.
One politician's preparing for the apocalypse like she's going to an all-inclusive resort in Tenerife, and another's telling everybody to drink responsibly.
And apparently Andy's emergency supplies include Twiglets.
Fucking Twiglets.
I mean, at what point did the national security discussion turn into everybody comparing what they've brought to a children's birthday party?
We're supposedly facing the possibility of World War Three, and our political leaders are having a conversation that wouldn't sound out of place in the middle aisle of Aldi.
And then there's the cyberattack warnings.
Apparently, Russia or China could launch a massive cyberattack and bring down our communications, electricity supplies and essential services.
Right.
And what am I supposed to do about that?
Unplug the kettle?
Put the laptop in a biscuit tin?
I can just imagine some highly trained Russian cyberwarfare specialist sitting in Moscow, surrounded by millions of pounds' worth of sophisticated computer equipment.
"Comrade, we have penetrated the British national infrastructure."
"Excellent. Shut down their electricity."
"We cannot, sir."
"Why not?"
"Some bastard in Ellesmere Port has wrapped his Virgin Media router in fucking Bacofoil."
It's a good job Churchill isn't around to witness this.
"We shall fight them on the beaches. We shall fight in the fields and in the streets. We shall never surrender."
"Unless we've run out of Pot Noodles, in which case we're absolutely fucked."
What a fucking pantomime.”
Jools retweeted
She knew of the allegations against her father for 8 years. With all the resources in the world available to her, she could have followed up, asked questions, tried to protect children who might possibly be harmed if the allegations were true.
She didn’t. 8 years passed and she did nothing. Her main concern was having public vindication for disowning her father, although the letter of accusations came to her a year after she actually disowned him for selling pap shots to the media.
Now the media wants to make her the victim??
Jools retweeted
I’m very sorry her father is an alleged paedophile and that she knew this while falsely accusing the Royal Family of being callous racists.
Jools retweeted
If the allegations against Thomas Markle Snr. prove true, charges should be laid and the full force of the law applied. If false, a full retraction and apology are in order. Should Thomas Markle Jnr. be culpable, the same standard must apply. Nobody deserves immunity or special treatment.
The allegations against her father are deeply disturbing, but they do not magically erase Meghan Markle’s own history of dishonesty, contradictions and conduct many consider cruel. One does not cancel out the other. The media and Sussex Squad would do well to grasp the elementary distinction between two entirely separate issues. Compassion for a potential victim does not require the suspension of scrutiny elsewhere, nor does it confer retrospective sainthood upon anyone.
If Meghan has known about these alleged crimes for years and deliberately remained silent, serious questions must be asked about her responsibility. As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, I find the prospect of someone possessing such knowledge yet failing to act to protect potentially vulnerable children utterly abhorrent. Whether that silence constitutes a criminal offence is for the law to determine. Morally, however, the implications are profoundly disturbing.
Childhood sexual abuse is not a public relations inconvenience, a weapon to be kept in reserve or a story to be dusted off when expedient. It is a devastating violation whose scars can endure for a lifetime, affecting almost every aspect of a survivor’s existence.
If you possess credible information that a child may be at risk, the responsibility to act must transcend personal grievances, reputation and self-interest. A child’s welfare must come first. Always. Not when convenient, not when public sympathy beckons, and certainly not when the revelation serves one’s own narrative.
If Meghan has possessed this information for years, the questions are simple. What did she know, when did she know it, and what did she do to protect those potentially at risk?
To remain silent whilst children may be vulnerable, only to invoke such horrors when they serve one’s own purposes, would represent a staggering failure of moral responsibility. Treating a matter this grave as another opportunity to occupy the moral high ground is repugnant.
Child abuse is not a stage upon which to perform victimhood. A child’s suffering is not a prop, their safety is not a bargaining chip, and their trauma does not exist to furnish anyone with a more compelling personal narrative.
If these allegations are true, let there be justice. If false, let there be accountability for the damage done. And if anyone knowingly allowed children to remain at risk when they could have raised the alarm, let that conduct be examined with the seriousness it deserves.
I speak as a survivor. The consequences of childhood sexual abuse do not disappear when the world stops talking about them. That is precisely why this matter demands the utmost seriousness, not exploitation for personal advantage.
Children deserve protection, not silence. Advocates, not spectators. Adults prepared to do what is right, however inconvenient or personally costly.
Anything less is an appalling betrayal of those who most desperately need protecting.
Jools retweeted
Thomas Markle's Scandal Is NOT Meghan Markle's Redemption Story.
The British media's sudden rush to rehabilitate Meghan is breathtaking.
The allegations against her father are deeply disturbing, but they don't magically erase her own history of dishonesty, contradictions, and cruelty. The media and Sussex Squad must stop conflating two entirely separate issues.
MY LATEST SUBSTACK: linklauren.substack.com/p/th…
Jools retweeted
Long read!
It took Scotland Yard less than 24 hours to detonate Montecito’s most shameless attempt at historical revisionism.
Friday:
Out came the imperious, violin-backed proclamation: she severed ties with her father in 2018 for “one reason only: to protect our children” after Scotland Yard supposedly briefed her on appalling allegations and assured her an investigation was underway. The staged pap photos? The tacky wedding leaks? Banished. Retroactively scrubbed into an act of spotless maternal martyrdom.
Saturday morning:
Scotland Yard pulled the actual, time-stamped receipts:
• Not 2018—January 2019.
• No active investigation.
• No foreign force alerts.
• No child welfare referral.
Protection Command essentially took one look, marked it ‘outside our jurisdiction’, and dumped a copy onto Harry’s desk “for awareness.”
Saturday afternoon:
Enter the frantic, humiliating climbdown. Suddenly, the woman who preserved forensic drafts to prove she was "meticulous in my word choice" for the High Court—and who famously kept a UK journal—wants everyone to believe a five-month black hole on the single most explosive allegation of her life was just a harmless senior moment because she didn't check a “diaried record.”
It’s an insult to everyone’s intelligence.
In August 2018, she sent her father a calligraphy-scripted, five-page FedEx letter weeping about him breaking her heart over staged photos and press interviews. Are we genuinely expected to believe royal protection handed her a grave criminal warning, and her response was to write him a tear-stained reprimand about tabloid interviews?
She didn’t cut him off to protect phantom children in 2018; she cut him off because he ruined her royal wedding aesthetics.
She saw Tom Jnr’s sordid, unverified claims as a golden ticket to rewrite seven years of brutal family vindictiveness into a heroic rescue mission. Instead, she sprinted headfirst into a Met Police timestamp.
If Thomas Snr walks away cleared of this, there isn't a PR firm on earth capable of digging her out of the crater she just willingly dove into.
Jools retweeted
"Do you feel more English or Bangladesh" - "Bangladesh"
"Do you miss Bangladesh?" - "Yes"
"What do you do for work?" - "I don't work"
"How do you make money and survive?" - "I get benefit"
There are millions more like him in the UK...
Jools retweeted
'enough drama' he says, after ten years and, what?... 100 million dollars 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗮 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗲? 🧌 what a foul shameless worm
Jools retweeted


































