Jules Dancing 🇬🇧

Hope Not Hate is a far left activist group that works with the Labour Party and British intelligence services to smear Labour’s opponents (and anyone to the right of Stalin) as “far right”. One of its senior staff members, Liron Velleman, was sentenced last week for child sex offences. (The others have not yet been caught). As well as being part of Hope Not Hate, Liron was also a Labour Party politician. I mean you can’t say the warning signs weren’t there. The only thing he’s missing from the full paedophile CV is being a BBC presenter. Despite being a demonstrable danger to children, Liron Velleman wasn’t given a jail sentence; his sentence was suspended, so he walked free from the court (he was spotted in the pub afterwards having a celebratory drink with his parents). This is an unusually lenient sentence for such crimes. I have so many questions. > Hope Not Hate specialise in online monitoring - they monitored my online presence, until they realised I’d hit puberty. Did Liron use the techniques and equipment provided to him by Hope Not Hate to commit his crimes? > Why is an organisation that’s so blatantly a political smear campaign group run by the Labour Party able to present itself as a non-partisan “anti fascist” organisation? > Why does an organisation that positions itself as a moral arbiter have so many sex offenders and violent criminals on its books? Other Hope Not Hate staff members have admitted to crimes such as attacking women with hammers. > Why is taxpayers’ money given to this shower of shite? But I’m going to look at why so many left-wing activists are paedophiles. Remember when Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself during a Black Lives Matter riot and shot three random left-wing rioters who were attacking him? It turned out that one of them was a convicted paedophile and another one was convicted of violence against women. Why were two out of three of the left-wing activists, the purest of the pure, who call themselves Antifa fighting against the scourge of “fascism”, objectively terrible people? THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST DEVIANCE There’s a psychological term “moral licensing”, where people who think that they’re doing good feel that their virtuosity gives them some sort of credit, a deposit of good karma, that then entitles them to do something bad later, as if the universe owes them. Similarly, psychologists use the term “moral cleansing”, the psychological tendency of people to engage in good deeds to restore their moral self-worth after committing an immoral act or correct some malevolent fault. So paedophiles like Liron Velleman think that working for Hope Not Hate will offset their crimes. By doing what they perceive as “good” or presenting themselves as virtuous, they will reset the balance, or build up credits they can spend noncing kids. It goes deeper than that. The essence of leftism is to prioritise the communal above individual rights, so nobody has autonomy over their bodies. We use our bodies to work, to earn money. Leftists don’t believe that the individual should own the fruits of their labour. They think that this effort, anything produced by it, is the property of the state. Extreme leftists see themselves as emblems of the state, so feel entitled to take this for themselves, whether that’s as money, as slavery (as we see under communist regimes) or, at the extreme end, as child abuse. Look how unconcerned leftists are about paedophilia, how they talk about grooming gangs. They excuse the crimes and accuse anyone who campaigns on behalf of the girls of being “grifters” because nobody on the left can even envisage that somebody might authentically be repulsed by these crimes. They think that the only possible motivation is financial. And we should remember that left-wing people are all spiteful communist mutants motivated by envy and hatred and are disgustingly ugly. Look at the boss of Hope Not Hate, Nick Lowles, who employs paedophiles, communists, men who attack women. As Wittgenstein said, morality and aesthetics are the same. PAEDOPHILES SEEK ESTABLISHMENT POWER And we also need to look at why Liron Velleman got such a lenient sentence. We know that the establishment is biased towards itself, and Liron was part of the establishment. Paedophiles - such as Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris and those in the church - tend to move themselves close to power and authority to give themselves the opportunity to commit their crimes, and also the influence to cover those crimes up. Liron Velleman was so embedded in the establishment that he even helped draft the government’s Online Safety Bill, a piece of legislation aimed at keeping children safe on the internet. This is like Jeffrey Epstein drafting a babysitting bill. If you want to keep children safe online, you’d statistically have a higher impact if you locked up everyone who helped draft the Online Safety Bill. While sentencing, Liron’s judge even said that a mitigating factor was that he was a Labour councillor? How is that a mitigating factor? That’s a big red flag right there, and that red flag has a hammer and sickle on it. Look how entitled Liron felt to protection from the establishment. After his trial, he went for a celebratory drink with his parents in a local pub. Someone spotted him and confronted him. Liron’s party immediately called the police on the man filming adults in a public place. They know the police will take this very seriously. That’s exactly what the police are there for. Not for protecting children in Rotherham, but for protecting an establishment nonce being spoken to in public. Look at the bizarrely, incongruously harsh sentences handed down to people on the right, such as Sam Melia, who was jailed printing and distributing stickers that said such awful things as “It’s OK to be white”. And Lucy Connolly, who tweeted then deleted her indifference to hotels containing migrants being burnt down “for all I care”. This insane focus on the supposed “far-right” doesn’t make sense. I’d feel much more comfortable leaving my children in the care of an average far-right bigot than the average far-left activist. I think we need to recalibrate our morality.