Silence from @WesleyLHuff is literally the loudest part of all this. So many instances exposed about his plagiarism, fraud, lies, and stating known misconceptions authoritatively as Dr. Matthew Larsen recently exposed too.
Huff's Masters Degree should be suspended pending due process and subsequently revoked.
Even if no action is taken, Huff needs to, as a "christian" never be involved in public ministry again, he needs to confess to the public and seek penence.
Accusations againt Huff arent just older, many are recent. Does he still think this is ok?
UPDATE:
WES HUFF RESPONDS
Claims to take responsibility for everything, says EVERY ARTICLE on the site is bad.
Then, makes a video filled with nothing but excuses, and ignores other instances.
@Alex_Ortodoxie was right, Wes needs to release everything and just come clean
Replying to @ErickYbarra3
@ErickYbarra3 had a 1 hour conversation with @JPuncut and @HHS3239 on The Gospel Truth ( @tgtengage ) on intercession of Saints and early church evidence.
I give credit where credit is due, y'all: Erick did so well, guys, he COOKED them so bad, he made a new recipe out of them
Seriously though, it's a good conversation, I wanted to see it go on longer.
Here is 9 minutes of the hour to look at. Full conversation linked:
youtube.com/live/GrAvUaN7Obo…
Replying to @C2Antiquity
@C2Antiquity awesome short about Shelley saying we dont need to love Jesus.
A ton of these easy-believists think this way. Here is @needGod_net saying the SAME THING: you dont need to love Jesus, in fact, loving Jesus "is a work."
@JesusandWhatnot
youtube.com/shorts/IRTgzktAS…
I love how I took the original and edited it, then Thaddeus, then others and its going back and forth 🤣 hilarious
1
5
346
Literally. Who tf starts a war months out of an election??
Tonight’s outcome isn’t about placing faith in Democrats or socialist principles; it’s about holding Republicans accountable for betraying their promises.
All Republicans had to do was:
1. put Americans First
2. not start another war
3. prosecute sex traffickers
2
251
Replying to @StephenBoyce333
@StephenBoyce333 and @Alex_Ortodoxie should have a show together explaining the entire timeline and pattern of events from both of yalls angles
Well, there it is again. @Alex_Ortodoxie is vindicated, and once more, @gavinortlund has gotten a source wrong.
No offense to Gavin, but this has become a pattern. At this point, when he cites a source, we should all check the full context for ourselves. I had a similar back-and-forth with him a few years ago over Shoemaker. I personally had to reach out to Shoemaker himself to settle the dispute.
In his exchange with Alex, Gavin kept appealing to Hurtado while ignoring Alex’s corrections concerning the other scholars he had cited. He doubled down on defending the one scholar he thought still supported his position. Now it’s clear that appeal doesn’t hold up either.
Gavin is wrong about the invocation of the saints, and he’s wrong about the scholarship. He needs to kindly concede the point and move on. Doubling down just makes it look worse.
1
10
233
Pope LEO appointed Archbishop of Vienna calls for ordination of women... where is his scolding? Nope, won't come.
El arzobispo de Viena dice en la radio pública que desearía la ordenación de mujeres
infovaticana.com/2026/11/03/…
107
Catholics, what do we say about this?
Archbishop of Vienna calls for ordination of women.
SCANDAL: Pope Leo-appointed Archbishop of Vienna supports the "ordination of women," wishing for it but calling a council decision unrealistic for now.
Archbishop Grünwidl is also pushing for the abolition of priestly celibacy.
lifesitenews.com/news/leo-ap…
1
3
342
More than Halloween, today is #ReformationDay
An annual remembrance that Luther and all the Reformers would believe that all the Protestants and Evangelicals today are heretics, and would advocate for your torture and executions.
They would want nothing to do with your pro-abortion skittle & women lead ministries.
1
130
Exactly, how Protestants reply to Orthodox are pasted arguments meant for Roman Catholics.
The Canon is a good example of this. Protestants are obsessed with it because its a major part of the RC-Prot debate.
The definition of the very word "canon" is different for us. We dont define it as a list of books that must be physically put together. We define it as the books that we read from in the Liturgy, and then tier them within the single category. Its more abstract the lower you go in tier. Even Prots admit that the Gospels are more authoritative than James for instance. Even many Prot Bibles contain the Apocrypha. "But just because its physically in the Book doesnt mean its included in the canon!" Uhhhh, exactly.... idiots.
So when we say we have one canon, they, like @JPuncut and @KellyPowersBPA call us liars. But they are just ignorant of the differences and totally unqualified to be talking to us. Totally unqualified to be talking to EO. And they dont hold themselves to their same standard.
9
280
Thank you @Craig_Truglia and @Alex_Ortodoxie for the stream!
A better treat than any of this commerically poisonous Trick or Treat candy for sure
10
312
EARLY CHURCH ICON OF MARY,
Catacombs of Priscilla, 200-220AD
1st MILLENIUM BYZANTINE ICON
Still used today by Orthodox
⭐️ Show this to anyone who says Icons weren't in the Early Church
ITS THE SAME CHURCH!
NOT the Church of Prots & Evangelicals
2
8
209
In my research for today, I found and read about this Irish-derived Liturgical Document used in the Celtic Orthodox Church. This is the page I found (it was hard reading the Latin font but I did it) showing the 2nd page of the Nicene Creed.
This is a manuscript of a document that actually spans centuries. I read one scholar that suggested its a copy of the oldest Celtic Orthodox Liturgy. But that's debated. This particular Manuscript was written in the 780s. Much of the wording is abbreviated Latin, my guess is to save space on the page.
On the 10th line, it reads "dominum & vivificantem qui ex patre procedit" which means "Lord and Giver of life, who proceeds from the Father"
Above the word Patre in the margins, you can see someone added a note. That note says "FilA. p.cedit." An 'A' abbreviation means "-que" in medieval Latin. So it means "Filioque procedit."
That's right. Latin Monks in England took a manuscript copied from an Ancient Celtic Orthodox Liturgy, and molested it with heresy by writing the filioque in the margins. Disgusting. Its debated when this was inserted, some scholars say just 20 years after this copy was made, some say a hundred years after. But it's irrelevant, really.
I bet the Monk who inserted that was a real Papist TradCatBro 100%
This also shows they knew the Creed originally didnt have filioque, and the Celtic Church preserved the Orthodox faith as St. Bede asserted, and they were making every effort to insert this heresy any chance they got.
"When will it be clear as day" - David Wood
Also David Wood:
(studder studder, think think, uhhh uhhh) *Fails to list the essentials of the gospel*





















