we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner) header
we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner) profile picture

Affordable housing nerd. Woman shaped agender being. Takes too many pictures. Lives in a weird little city. All opinions are my own. They/them, please

Alexandria, VA
Joined April 2012
Photo by we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner)Photo by we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner)Photo by we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner)Photo by we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner)Photo by we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner)Photo by we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner)Photo by we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner)Photo by we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner)Photo by we fight for roses too (@KCadenaPlanner)
things get a little difficult when you're putting a miracle together
6
we fight for roses too retweeted
Zoning in America is what you’d get if every old crank with an axe to grind got to write a law to limit something they didn’t like. I appreciate the work of dismantling these walls to prosperity and equity brick by brick, but at what point do we just tear the whole thing down?
We're making childcare WAY more accessible (🧵) For decades, building childcare facilities hasn't been allowed in most of Austin (yellow/red). My first item of 2023 is changing this. Now, nearly our entire city will be zoned for childcare development (green).
9
27
1
205
18,512
it's incredible that so many people refuse to use perhaps the greatest, most life-saving invention of all time because they're afraid of needles
18
7
5
374
32,526
we fight for roses too retweeted
Cars hit buildings, 7-11 in particular, so frequently and with such force, it is incumbent on the business to protect themselves with real bollards. Yet the message for people on foot/bikes is to prevent their own deaths with eye contact, foam hats and bright colors.
Replying to @Boenau
7-11 just had to pay 91 million because they had no bollards and a guy lost both legs when a car hit him. This type of accident and lawsuit is common
5
67
1
551
27,882
we fight for roses too retweeted
I don't think people realize the dangers they put disabled people in when expecting us to ask for "nicely" for accommodations. Not only can they refuse it. It puts a target on our backs. And they can later attack us by mentioning that they gave us accessibility once.
8
186
3
884
20,067
we fight for roses too retweeted
How to become wealthy in the USA: * Never get sick * Never have a sick spouse, or divorce them immediately if they get sick * Don't allow your children to get sick * Don't take care of your parents or siblings if they get sick * Inherit a home or enough money to buy a home
5
18
158
8,584
we fight for roses too retweeted
Retweet if you think all hospitals should #BringBackMasks
31
3,363
109
4,026
187,112
we fight for roses too retweeted
Replying to @amoralorealis
i just dont get why people think single family homes have to be coddled like these flustered chickens and need these big tall buildings wrapping the perimeter like the castle walls and to have such admiration of the classical city and not realize none taper density like that
1
48
2,247
we fight for roses too retweeted
the legacy environmental movement had some big wins fifty years ago but today it's exactly this pastoralist sentiment *within the democratic coalition* that's standing in the way of solving many of our problems from carbon to housing
1
12
234
4,817
we fight for roses too retweeted
👏 ALL 👏 REPUBLICANS 👏 SUPPORT 👏 A 👏 NATIONAL 👏 ABORTION 👏 BAN. 👏 PERIOD.
3
1
10
2,932
So, I really like this post because it describes sensory overload in a nutshell.
10
1,353
79
8,586
224,271
we fight for roses too retweeted
Design regulation: theory versus practice.
23
50
3
1,060
88,001
Allowing Trump to lie on @MeetThePress and leaving “fact checking” to the website is not how we should be treating a man who launched an insurrection. It’s 2023, we should have learned this lesson over 7 years. Ratings aren’t worth our democracy
3
5,295
447
27,072
547,403
we fight for roses too retweeted
Key point here: The effort by Senate Dems to examine Starlink's contracts with the Defense Department are perfectly consistent with the sort of oversight Congress often does. Don't let the Musk distortion field obscure that truth.
Elon Musk runs a US defense contractor. He's shown himself to be an unreliable partner, at best ignorant of international affairs and susceptible to Russian propaganda. Executive branch oversight and defense procurement are part of Congress's job. They're looking into it. Good.
20
654
5
2,462
243,994