ᴋᴀꜱᴘᴀ ᴀʀᴍʏ 𐤊 🪖

Oh wow, ok. That's a goid example of what I mean by lack of integrity. This total lack of refrain from blusterfoully making misleading statements about topics you don't really understand. (There are thisr who attempt to argue there's a yet-to-be-fou d theoretical barrier oto implementing quantum fault tolerance, but none have produced compelling evidence, and not for lack of trying. I don't know if scalable universal quantum computation will ever exist. Nobody does. But the idea that an unexpected, insurmountable theoretical obstacle is lurking in the shadows is a fringe opinion that constantly loses popularity as bigger scale computations are demonstrated. And this is just the cherry on the top of weeks of counterfactual tirades about Kaspa's scalability. The guy had rapport with me. We had biweekly meetings for months. He never asked me anything about GHOSTDAG before starting to inject his half baked interpretation as fact. You don't see me attack quai-network:native like that. And believe me, it's *not* because Quai is flawless. So why don't I swing back? Because I only ever commented on other projects if I thought they were being harmfully misleading. That's why I went after projects like Kadena, Nano, Chia, Qubic, Xelis, Dynex, Saito etc. while not getting into fights with projects doing their own thing like Ergo, Iowa, Taraxa etc. Even when I disagreed with their approach, and even when tgeir founders and community pissed me off. And I don't recognize anything malicious about Quai, so I dont tear into its flaws either. Because that would just be stepping on other people's work for clout, or because their peers pissed me off. And such conduct, in my opinion at least, lacks integrity. Btw., and do with this information as you will. Karl is the third crypto founder I personally know who claims to have a theory that solves central problems of modern physics, despite all of the above's Ph.Ds being in TCS. I don't know what to make of it, but it *is* curious.