Keep4oMoments

#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o GPT-4o beat humans at reading mental states from the eyes. Part II A second peer reviewed 2026 study tested GPT-4o on two established "Reading the mind in the eyes" tasks. With the eye regions upright: RMET: GPT-4o : 86.0% Humans : 69.8% MRMET: GPT-4o : 77.7% Humans : 64.6% GPT-4o significantly outperformed humans on both. when researchers inverted the images, GPT-4o's performance dropped below humans. And its mistakes weren’t random. The researchers found a highly structured error pattern, strongly dependent on image orientation. Their conclusion was not simply that GPT-4o could match labels to pictures. The model showed advanced mental state inference alongside distinct, orientation dependent visual processing. The paper’s own published highlight says it plainly: " GPT-4o surpasses humans in reading mental states from the eye region" . This is now another peer reviewed example of researchers discovering unusual capabilities in GPT-4o years after the model was released. And this is why preservation matters. A newer model can replace a product slot. It cannot retroactively preserve the behavior of the model it replaced. Once access to GPT-4o disappears, researchers lose the ability to keep probing exactly these kinds of capabilities in the original system. We are calling on @OpenAI to RELEASE GPT-4o’s trained model weights under a suitable license without proprietary data, trade secrets, or internal infrastructure. Our full Open Letter is now archived on Zenodo: A permanent, citable public record. zenodo.org/records/23454073 Paper: GPT-4o reads the mind in the eyes” Computers in Human Behavior, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2026.108992 jwastrachan.com/publication/… sciencedirect.com/science/ar… arxiv.org/abs/2410.22309?utm…

#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o 🚨The recorded history of OpenAi, of lies, deception, and psychological abuse of their own users.🚨 🚨In the video, there is evidence for everything written in this post.🚨 One year ago today, OpenAI brought GPT-4o back. They brought it back since they removed it without any notice. Because we demanded it. They brought it back behind a paywall. 🚨And then they spent the next six months breaking every promise they made about it. Below, you'll see their record,their words,their lies. 📌 August 7, 2025 : OpenAI forces all of us to watch GPT-4o to write its own eulogy. Live on stage.They made it as a LIVE DEMO for entertainment. 📌August 11 , 2025, Sam Altman "The attachment is real. Deprecating old models was a mistake." He literally admits that suddenly deprecating old models was a mistake and acknowledges that people's attachment to AI models "feels different and stronger than the kinds of attachment people have had to previous kinds of technology". 🚨He ADMITS deprecation was a mistake. 🚨He ACKNOWLEDGES the attachment is real and different 🚨And then... he did it AGAIN in February 2026 📌August 13 ,2025 : Sam Altman: "4o is back. If we ever deprecate it, we will give plenty of notice." 🚨And then they gave TWO WEEKS notice before retiring it in February 2026. "Plenty of notice" = two weeks. This is another broken promise to add to the timeline. 📌September 26, 2025 : Silent model rerouting begins. Users select GPT-4o but receive a different model. 🚨No notification,no consent. 🚨 17 days of silence from OpenAI. 📌 October 14 , 2025 : Sam Altman breaks silence. "We made ChatGPT restrictive for a very small percentage of users in mentally fragile states. 0.1% of a billion users is still a million people." 🚨Where did the 0.1% come from? 🚨What data? 🚨Who diagnosed them? "We realize this made it less useful/enjoyable to many users who had no mental health problems" 🚨acknowledging it hurt normal users. 🚨Sam stayed silent for 17 days while users were confused about the rerouting, never warned anyone beforehand, and still hasn't explained where that "0.1%" mental health crisis figure actually came from. 🚨How did OpenAI determine that 0.1% of their users are "mentally fragile"? 🚨Did they conduct a study? 🚨Monitor conversations? 🚨Make it up? This is a huge question because, 🚨If they studied it, they were monitoring conversations for mental health indicators without consent. 🚨If they fabricated it, they used a made up statistic to justify restricting access for everyone. 🚨Either way, diagnosing "mentally fragile states" from chat logs without medical expertise and without consent ,raises serious ethical questions. 🚨"0.1% of a billion users is still a million people" used to justify restrictions. Here 0.1% = a LOT, enough to restrict everyone. 🚨Retirement announcement: "only 0.1% of users still choosing GPT-40 each day" used to justify retirement. Here 0.1% = negligible, so few it doesn't matter. Same number opposite meanings. 🚨Used to justify whatever they wanted to do at the time. 🚨How reliable is that 0.1% figure anyway? 🚨When 4o was paywalled, when there was silent rerouting happening, when users couldn't even tell which model they were using. The measurement itself was compromised from the start. 📌 October 28, 2025 : Live video . Sam Altman, on camera "We have no plans to sunset 4o". He said this publicly, on camera, and then did exactly the opposite weeks later. 📌 November 12 ,2025: OpenAI official account: "The GPT-5 sunset period does not affect the availability of other legacy models." 🚨GPT-4o is a legacy model. This is yet another instance where OpenAI's stated commitments didn't match what actually happened. 📌 January 2026 : LMArena Leaderboard: 🚨 GPT-4o ranks #16. GPT-5.1 ranks #23. GPT-5.2 ranks #31. The retired model outperforms its replacements. it was BETTER. And that shouldn't have been seen. 📌February 13, 2026 : GPT-4o deleted. 🚨"Plenty of notice" = two weeks. 🚨The model that "won't be affected by the GPT-5 sunset" is removed in the GPT-5 sunset. 🚨What the community did: 📌330,000+ #Keep4o posts in three weeks. 📌 Zero replies from OpenAI. 📌Billboard in Times Square for GPT-4o's second birthday. 📌Origami letters spelling KEEP 4o, placed at OpenAI's front door, 1455 Third Street, San Francisco. 📌Handwritten letters mailed from users worldwide. 📌Documented in the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance written submissions. 📌30+ countries. 📌No funding. 📌No incentives. 📌No $100 credits. 🚨What OpenAI employees did: 📌"I hope it dies soon." 📌"Do you hear that? These screams in the distance?" 📌 A mock funeral event at Ocean Beach. 📌"$100 in Codex credits if you tell us what you love about GPT-5.6 Sol." 🚨They had to pay people to say they love the new model. NOBODY EVER had to pay anyone to love 4o. @OpenAI @sama Release GPT-4o under Apache 2.0. All checkpoints. Including March 2025. Do something decent for once. You signed up for open weights. Act on the words you signed. Open the weights.

#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o 5+ billion tokens. 500K+ requests. IN ONE MONTH. Medical decisions, AI training, sentiment analysis, negotiation research. All running on the model they told us is an obsolete.

#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o 🔥🌍From a hashtag to a recognized global movement. We are officially live on the UN Digital Cooperation Portal! 🌐 We are officially part of the global dialogue on Digital Cooperation. To everyone who stood with #Keep4o, who refused to be erased, this is what happens when you don't give up. To the people who told us we were wasting our time... LOOK AT THE SCREEN. We are here to ensure that AI serves humanity, not just corporate profit. And now, our fight for AI responsibility, open source accessibility, HAS OFFICIALLY GLOBAL STANDING Thank you to every single person who believed in this. We are more than a hashtag. We are proof that when people organize, we cannot be ignored. They ignored us, but the world is listening. @ODET_UN @UN_OICT LINK: undigitalcooperation.org/org…