Look at this cunt, just repeating whatever shit he read without knowing what he says. 40 000km is HUGE and what the fuck is "4 meter drop over 10km"?
That's not how this works but if you're dumb, that's enough right?
If we lived on a rotating globe of the deep, then every sea, lake, marsh, canal, and other large standing body of water would have to have an arc or semicircle that curves from a central apex.
For example, if the circumference of the globe is 40,000 km, as NASA and modern astronomers say, then spherical trigonometry dictates that the surface of all standing water should curve downward by 7.5 cm per square kilometer of distance.
This means that along the canal of 10 km of standing water, the ground will drop almost 4 meters at both ends from the central peak. To the benefit of real science, and to the detriment of the pseudoscience of modern astronomy, such an experiment can be tested.
And guess what? The earth is not a ball👌
ALT If we lived on a rotating globe of the deep, then every sea, lake, marsh, canal, and other large standing body of water would have to have an arc or semicircle that curves from a central apex.
For example, if the circumference of the globe is 40,000 km, as NASA and modern astronomers say, then spherical trigonometry dictates that the surface of all standing water should curve downward by 7.5 cm per square kilometer of distance.
This means that along the canal of 10 km of standing water, the ground will drop almost 4 meters at both ends from the central peak. To the benefit of real science, and to the detriment of the pseudoscience of modern astronomy, such an experiment can be tested.
And guess what? The earth is not a ball!
