Ab Klink (@KlinkAb) profile picture

Scientific Council for Government Policy/prof VU Amsterdam. Formerly Minister of Health Care, Senate/Board Health Insurance Co VGZ/,PwC Strategy& EU/Middle East

Amsterdam, Nederland
Joined September 2011
Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)Photo by Ab Klink (@KlinkAb)
Voorzag Twitter, denk ik
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
2
4
1
15
„For the Quest is achieved, and now all is over. I am glad you are here with me. Here at the end of all things, Sam.“ J.R.R. Tolkien: The Lord if the Rings: The Return of the King (Book 6, Chapter 3: Mount Doom)
58
265
11
2,238
63,080
Ab Klink retweeted
Who is the political leader America needs right now? It's not Zohran Mamdani or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu tells Mishal Husain. Listen at bit.ly/4fwjedT or watch The Mishal Husain Show at bloomberg.com/videos
7
32
14
229
151,351
I received a report – we carried out two missile strikes, destroying two Russian Su-34s and hitting an Iskander launcher. Thank you, guys, for this result! Another aspect of our anti-ballistic work is the packages of interceptors, primarily for Patriots, that our partners can provide us. They must protect lives. We now have intel about the Russians preparing new ballistic missile attacks. We need the capabilities to shoot down this Russian evil and are awaiting the decisions. Thank you to everyone who really helps us!
1,149
4,813
141
27,347
460,721
Die SPD Berlin sollte spätestens jetzt auf die Koalition mit der Linken verzichten. Antisemitismus in deren Reihen reicht eigentlich schon aus. Aber wenn die Partei bei Polizei und Sicherheit sparen will, und selbst Angst vor den Clans hat, sollte sie in Berlin nicht regieren. spiegel.de/politik/deutschla…
500
235
42
2,504
88,659
Ab Klink retweeted
Wow, wow, wow.
47
92
6
883
57,205
I am not able to read the article, but this thread is very interesting.
Sharing a new piece in Foreign Policy with the fantastic Ma Xiao from PKU, unpacking some of the local govt dynamics behind China's industrial policy, and why they make Beijing's efforts to rein in overcapacity so difficult! (By the way Xiao has done, in my mind, some of the most insightful research on this topic… Add his work to your reading list if you have not already done so!) The general idea: we tend to talk about “China’s industrial policy” as if it is coherent. Many already understand that local governments have their own incentives and that implementation differs. But how do they actually bargain, compete, improvise(!), and sometimes push much further than Beijing intended? We start with two puzzles: Beijing planned for 12,000 km of high-speed rail by 2020; China ended up with roughly 40,000 km. Beijing's auto ambition was to have a small number of large SOEs and JVs. Instead, many of the real stars like Geely, BYD, Nio, etc. are private firms backed by local governments, often finding ways around regulatory restrictions with local help. Our key argument: local governments are (opportunistic) policy entrepreneurs. They have few formal ways to push their interests at the top, so they cultivate allies, bargain through ministries, back private firms, launch things first and seek approval later… and compete intensely for one scarce resource: top leadership attention! That “attention economy” is key. Hence the focus on showcase projects. And hence, when it comes to stuff that looks good on camera, e.g., EVs, drones, robotics, etc., they pile in. The fiscal angle has of course been discussed too, but is also key: Local governments still have every incentive to prop up firms, protect employment, avoid bankruptcies, etc., especially in places with few alternatives. The Shenzhens of China can afford to let a zombie EV firm fail; an already fiscally constrained city heavily dependent on one or two industries has very different options. Then there is the cadre system. Officials get credit for launching a mega project, then often rotate elsewhere before the costs / waste / downside risks show up. The average tenure of provincial and city leaders is only about three and a half years, so achievements have to show up fast. We then use this framework to explain why rebalancing toward consumption is so hard: consumption is slow-moving, difficult to measure as a local KPI, and hard to credit to a particular locality… and why reining in local debt is so difficult, since debt-led growth shows up before the consequences do. Full article below: China’s Overcapacity Has a Mind of Its Own Beijing can’t rein in its own industrial machine. foreignpolicy.com/2026/10/26…
6
12
2
95
24,147
Ab Klink retweeted
This paper answers why confident idiots run the world. Cornell University published a psychological paper that explains every terrible boss, every loud influencer, and every broken corporate hierarchy. It’s called “Unskilled and Unaware of It.” they tested participants across logic, grammar, and humor to measure the gap between actual performance and self-perception. And the results are wild. participants scoring in the bottom 12th percentile consistently believed they were operating in the 62nd percentile. they were not lying. they were literally incapable of recognizing their own incompetence. the paper revealed a brutal paradox: the exact skills required to master a domain are the exact same skills required to accurately evaluate your own competence in that domain. if you lack the skill, you inherently lack the cognitive capacity to realize you are failing. this creates a dangerous systemic loop. the incompetent are blessed with absolute, blinding certainty. their brain protects them from their own ignorance, allowing them to speak first, demand authority, and never second-guess their decisions. meanwhile, the actual experts suffer the exact inverse. top performers in the study consistently underestimated their rank. because a task was easy for them, they falsely assumed it was easy for everyone else. they hesitate. they obsess over nuance. they assume they have nothing unique to add. we are biologically wired to confuse confidence with competence. the loudest person in the room gets promoted, gets funded, and gets the microphone, not because they know what they are doing, but because they are physically incapable of seeing what they don't. the only defense mechanism is building systems that stop rewarding absolute certainty and start demanding proof of work.
533
4,302
712
16,785
778,201
It so interesting that there is no one in the Democratic party (or anywhere else in the world that I am aware of) who can do this. Pedagogic, extremely clear, brutal. He is still, by far, the best.
Barack Obama decided to hit Pete Hegseth with the elbow from the top rope. Absolutely brutal takedown.
77
294
16
3,465
257,296
Professor Daniel Schwartz of Hebrew University has just published in the Journal of Jewish Studies a 24-page review article on my book, *Josephus and Jesus*. liverpooluniversitypress.co.… Professor Schwartz is the first academic reviewer, to my knowledge, to state his disagreement with my conclusions about the authenticity of Josephus's testimony about Jesus (the Testimonium Flavianum), but he is still complimentary, he writes: “To conclude: although Schmidt's erudition and arguments are impressive, I still tend to believe that the TF proclaims Christian beliefs.” He also adds that I provide “a detailed and well-informed study of some details of Judaean prosopography of the first century, one that is valuable for its own sake.” I am honored that such eminent scholars have taken so much time in responding to my book. Daniel Schwartz, Steve Mason, and James Carlton Paget have combined to write over 50 pages in their academic reviews. What is more is the fact that all three have approached the task with admirable clarity and charity, having understood and fairly portrayed my arguments. Mason stated that my arguments for authenticity were “strong” and Paget wrote that my argument is the “best case” hitherto made for authenticity. I am gathering and going through all the reviews thus far written and am finding them very stimulating. I hope to incorporate them into some kind of second edition or follow-up article in the future.
4
16
151
6,069
**You need to watch Zelenskyy's interview with Steven Bartlett.** Sitting in front of the camera is an utterly exhausted, at times visibly broken man who has spent almost five years personally managing a war, making critical decisions day and night. From the very first minutes, you can see just how drained he is. When asked the routine question, "How are you?" he replies that he barely sleeps because he spends his nights in military group chats, moving the last remaining air defense systems from one region to another. Two stories are particularly heartbreaking. The first is about a missile that struck a children's playground within seconds, while parents watched from their apartment windows as their children were torn apart. The second is about presenting posthumous military awards to the families of fallen soldiers: "You present an award to a father, feel his strong hand, and then he quietly asks, 'Can we hug?' At that moment, I simply cease to exist inside. These people are gone. They will never be the same again." When the host tries to take him back into his past, showing old photographs from Kryvyi Rih, his student comedy performances, his voice acting as Paddington Bear, and scenes from *Servant of the People*, Zelenskyy looks at them with detachment, almost as though he is watching someone else's life. He also recalls February 2022 without any attempt to portray himself as a hero. He says that for the first 20 days, he simply ran from office to office on adrenaline, calling everyone he could and trying to organize deliveries of water and food to Kyiv. Fear and the full realization of what had happened only caught up with him three weeks later, when Bucha was liberated and mass graves containing hundreds of murdered civilians were discovered. Using Bucha as an example, he explains why advice from outsiders to simply negotiate a quick deal causes him such deep frustration: "Imagine that in the United States or Britain, a mass grave is discovered containing 500 tortured people with their hands tied. How could you simply forgive everything after that?" The rest of the conversation revolves around the deadlock in which Ukrainians, and indeed everyone involved, now find themselves. Zelenskyy explains the causes of the war in simple terms: Moscow is trying to forcibly rebuild the Soviet empire because Ukraine's integration into Europe would finally bury that project. But when the conversation turns to the present, there is unmistakable bitterness in his words. Almost one-fifth of Ukraine's territory is occupied. The east is under relentless bombardment. Cities are left without electricity. People are dying every single day. Meanwhile, every discussion about a ceasefire runs into the same demand: Kyiv must withdraw even farther from its fortified positions, without any guarantees that Russia will not launch another offensive a year later. Toward the end, the conversation turns to Trump and Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil facilities. Trump publicly reprimands Zelenskyy over attacks on Russian refineries because he fears rising diesel prices for American farmers ahead of the elections. And this is where you can see just how deeply that approach affects Zelenskyy. His country is burning. Moscow has rejected his proposal for a mutual halt to attacks on energy infrastructure. Patriot missiles paid for by Europe are being redirected by the Americans to the Middle East. And somehow, Zelenskyy is the one being blamed for fuel prices in the United States. The entire interview leaves you with a profoundly bleak feeling. Here is a man trapped between the daily deaths of people in his own country and the pragmatic bargaining of allies who have their own elections, their own interests, and their own political calculations. And yet, he can no longer step away from this responsibility. **Watch it.**
267
2,045
109
6,987
220,917
Nee, natuurlijk niet, kleinere klassen zijn leuk voor de werkdruk van de leraar, maar qua leerrendement werken ze alleen in de eerste schooljaren (zoals ze in Frankrijk doen, kinderen in achterstandswijken in de eerste jaren maximaal 12 leerlingen. Kunnen wij nog wat van leren).
3
5
37
2,318
This is sick shit.
OH MY GOD!!! This just played as Trump walked into his rally in North Carolina. This is not normal. "So God gave us Trump." "So God made Trump." "So God gave us Trump." "So God made Trump." MAGA is a cult.
203
332
45
2,778
431,229
👇👇👇
President Trump’s decision to waive sanctions against Russia as Putin continues his brutal war of aggression against Ukraine dishonors the legacy of the late Senator Lindsey Graham and is decidedly not in the national interests of the United States and should be reversed. Putin is a war criminal and only understands strength. Waiving Graham Act sanctions on Russia signals weakness at a moment that demands American strength. Now is the time to stand strong against Russian aggression, just as we did during the years of the first Trump Administration. A victory in Ukraine would be a victory for freedom and is squarely in the national interests of the United States. If Putin overruns Ukraine, I have no doubt it will only be a matter of time until Russia’s military crosses a border that our troops will have to deal with him. For the cause of freedom, for America’s national security and that of our allies including Ukraine, President Trump should Restore sanctions under the Graham Act immediately, Rescind the diesel deal with Russia and Rally our Allies to ensure Ukraine has the military support it needs to repel and defeat this Russian invasion once and for all. Slava Ukraini🇺🇸🇺🇦wsj.com/politics/policy/trum…
17
63
285
4,676
Ich befürchte, dass Frau Le Pen die Präsidentschaftswahlen gestern gewonnen hat.
375
262
33
3,691
141,907
affreux
FRANCE 🇫🇷 : A heartbreaking scene😢. A business owner desperately pleads with looters and vandals to leave her shop alone. Her livelihood is being destroyed before her eyes. No business owner should have to endure this.
18
27
2
213
22,343
pretty much clinches it for le Pen
This looks more like an Islamist insurrection than a protest for nicer classrooms.
178
330
27
3,757
143,248
Ab Klink retweeted
„STATTDESSEN stärken wir die Demokratiebildung an unseren Schulen“ - weil Bundeswehr natürlich nichts mit Demokratie zu tun hat. Und Grüne und SPD grinsen dazu. Ich kann gar nicht so viel….
5
4
1
165
5,387
Lieber Boris, „Die Kooperationsvereinbarung der Bildungsverwaltung mit der Bundeswehr werden wir beenden“ Mit herzlichen Grüßen Deine @spdberlin
214
542
68
3,271
265,600