ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious) header
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious) profile picture

Web4 BD🤝| DeFi - RWA, NFT| Trader📊 | Fast learner adding real value daily | DMs open for collabs & chats

📍Among Builders & Believers
Joined June 2021
Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)Photo by ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 (@Krypto_Curious)
Most people only approach crypto trading this way: 1. Send money to an exchange 2. Hope the exchange doesn’t get hacked 3. Trade only crypto There’s a better way now. @HertzFlow_xyz just launched Mainnet. Stay with me so you dont get left behind /🧵
87
28
110
5,116
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
YOUR PRIVATE KEY ISN’T THE ONLY THING THAT CAN PUT YOUR CRYPTO AT RISK. After the Binance exploit, I looked deeper into how crypto networks handle stolen funds. On October 30, @arbitrum’s Security Council intervened to secure 8,425 ETH and 74,559,805.2 ARB linked to the exploit. It temporarily upgraded Ethereum Inbox, used an override function to move funds into a holding address, then restored the original implementation. The action required 9 of 12 council approvals. This reveals an important reality: your private key isn’t the only authority that can affect your assets. ⊹ NETWORK-LEVEL CONTROL Emergency councils and administrators can upgrade contracts, pause functions or intervene. ▹ @arbitrum: 12-member Security Council, 9-of-12 emergency threshold. ▹ @Optimism: Guardian and Proxy Admin Owner roles; Superchain upgrades involve the Security Council and Foundation. ▹ @zksync: Security Council emergency upgrades. ⊹ TOKEN-LEVEL CONTROL On @solana, mint authority creates tokens, while freeze authority can freeze token accounts. Both can be reassigned or revoked. ⊹ PROTOCOL ADMINISTRATION Administrators and governance can modify upgradeable contracts, collateral parameters and oracle settings. @aave governance controls risk parameters and price-source configurations affecting collateral and liquidations. ⊹ WALLET-LEVEL PERMISSIONS @safe supports modules and guards that extend or restrict transaction execution. In June 2026, vulnerabilities involving Zodiac Delay and Roles modules affected Gnosis Pay’s Safe infrastructure. Approximately $1.5M was extracted and another $300K became inaccessible. Gnosis said it absorbed the losses and restored user funds. The vulnerabilities involved connected modules, not Safe’s core contract. ⊹ CROSS-CHAIN VERIFICATION ▹ @wormhole: 19 Guardians, 13 signatures required. ▹ @LayerZero_Core: Configurable Decentralized Verifier Networks. ▹ @chainlink CCIP: Decentralised oracle infrastructure, additional verification and configurable rate limits. The 2022 Wormhole exploit allowed an attacker to mint 120,000 wrapped ETH on Solana after verification failed. ⊹ STABLECOIN ISSUER CONTROL In April 2026, @Tether announced freezing over $344M in USDT across two addresses following information from U.S. authorities. @circle also documents its ability to block addresses from sending or receiving USDC and EURC. Your private key cannot override issuer restrictions. ⊹ TRANSACTION-ORDERING POWER Ethereum validators propose blocks, while specialised builders participate through MEV-Boost. On many Layer 2s, sequencers influence transaction ordering, inclusion, delays and censorship resistance. Check decentralised sequencing and forced-inclusion protections. ⊹ OFFCHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE RPC providers, cloud services, indexers and frontends support crypto applications. Outages or compromises can disrupt access and transaction submission even when the blockchain remains operational. ⊹ TOOLS THAT HELP YOU CHECK ▹ @l2beat: Layer 2 security, upgrades and sequencers. ▹ @RevokeCash: Inspect and revoke unnecessary token and NFT approvals. ▹ @etherscan: Check ERC-20 and NFT spending permissions. ▹ @solana: Explore token accounts and mint or freeze authorities. Revoking approvals does not remove issuer freeze powers or reverse completed transactions. Disconnecting a wallet does not revoke existing approvals. ⊹ WHAT USERS SHOULD CHECK ▹ Networks: Emergency and upgrade powers. ▹ Tokens: Mint and freeze authorities. ▹ Protocols: Admin roles and timelocks. ▹ Wallets: Signers, modules and guards. ▹ Bridges: Verification models and thresholds. ▹ Stablecoins: Issuer freezing policies. ▹ Transactions: Sequencers and forced inclusion. ▹ Infrastructure: RPC and frontend dependencies. Emergency powers can protect users, but understanding who controls them and what prevents misuse matters. The Arbitrum intervention made me look beyond private-key security.
177
3
1
229
14,794
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
MIDWEEK ALPHA v.15 THE X GROWTH SYSTEM: HOW TO TURN CONTENT INTO DISTRIBUTION Let’s be honest. Many crypto creators are getting X growth completely wrong. Everyone wants more followers, impressions, Smart Followers, Kaito Mindshare and a higher Sorsa Score, but few are focused on becoming worth following. Chasing metrics while recycling others’ content will not build a credible research brand. Growth starts with positioning, useful research and distribution Here is how to build one⭣ ✧ POSITIONING COMES FIRST Your account needs a clear identity. Trying to cover everything in crypto makes your content difficult to recognise. Randomly switching between DeFi, memes, predictions, promotions and ecosystem updates is not positioning. Choose areas where you can consistently provide value. Build your reputation around research, analysis and education. People should associate your account with a recognisable standard of insight. ✧ GIVE YOUR CONTENT PURPOSE Random posting is not a strategy Build around clear pillars: ▹ Research: Protocols, infrastructure, token economics and security. ▹ Education: Explain concepts and how products work. ▹ Market commentary: Analyse developments and implications. ▹ Personal perspective: Share informed opinions and lessons. Focus on subjects you understand, not every trend. ✧ STOP REPEATING NEWS AND CALLING IT RESEARCH Repeating an announcement does not make you a researcher. When a protocol announces an upgrade, integration or new product, investigate what actually changed. Examine the problem, technology, potential benefits, limitations and risks. An integration announcement is only the starting point. The real analysis explains what it enables, who benefits, what dependencies it introduces and whether it creates measurable demand. ✧ LONGER POSTS ARE NOT DEEPER RESEARCH More words do not mean better analysis. Avoid jargon and repetition. Cover the development, how it works, supporting evidence, implications, risks and your conclusion. Use primary sources, verify figures and explain complex ideas clearly. Every paragraph should add value. ✧ DISTRIBUTION IS PART OF THE WORK Publishing good content and disappearing is not a growth strategy. Participate in relevant discussions, contribute useful analysis and engage with people in your niche. Avoid generic replies written solely for visibility. Add insight, evidence or a meaningful perspective. Build relationships through valuable interactions. Give people reasons to recognise your contribution beyond your timeline. ✧ UNDERSTAND THE METRICS Smart Followers, Kaito Mindshare and Sorsa Score indicate aspects of visibility and influence, not expertise. ▹ Smart Followers: Influential accounts connected to your audience. ▹ Mindshare: Attention within a topic, not research quality or positive sentiment. ▹ Sorsa Score: Influence and network position, not an official X ranking. ▹ Impressions: Views, not unique readers or understanding. ▹ Engagement: Interactions, not research quality. ▹ Profile visits and follows: Whether attention converts into audience growth. Use metrics to improve strategy, not define identity. High scores do not automatically create trust. ✧ BUILD A REPEATABLE SYSTEM Stop relying on inspiration. Create a process and be consistent Consistency becomes easier when your content has direction. Build a pipeline around: ▹ Deep research into protocols and infrastructure. ▹ Educational explainers. ▹ Data-backed market analysis. ▹ Commentary on important industry developments ▹ Short, informed observations Track developments, save sources and research before topics become popular Do not publish simply to stay active. Every post should serve a purpose ✧ TURN ATTENTION INTO AUTHORITY Clarify your focus, pin your strongest research and build work people can revisit Earn authority through evidence, independent thinking and consistent value not exaggerated claims or borrowed opinions.
85
2
163
14,006
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
ELYSIUM ALPHA: HOW TO POSITION BEFORE MAINNET @Enter_Elysium is scheduled to launch its public mainnet on November 9. Built by @Kinetiq_xyz, Elysium is an EVM Layer 2 expanding the trading, liquidity and application infrastructure of @HyperliquidX. The opportunity is identifying applications that turn Elysium’s infrastructure into sustainable activity. ▹ WHY ELYSIUM MATTERS HyperCore powers Hyperliquid’s trading infrastructure; HyperEVM supports smart contracts and decentralised applications. Elysium adds a separate execution environment to give developers more capacity without replacing HyperEVM. Built on Arbitrum Orbit, Nitro and ArbOS, it settles to HyperEVM and uses $HYPE as its native gas token. Published targets include 100–200ms blocks and 300 Mgas/s throughput. These are design targets, not proof of sustained mainnet performance. ▹ THE HYPERCORE ADVANTAGE This is arguably Elysium’s strongest differentiator. A planned integration will let smart contracts access HyperCore market data, including order books, prices, balances and positions. A separate interface will allow applications to submit trading instructions to HyperCore. This could support market-making, automated execution and liquidity-management applications with less reliance on external data integrations. These capabilities are planned for an ArbOS upgrade about four weeks after mainnet, not launch day. ▹ THE TOKEN AND LIQUIDITY PATHWAY Elysium outlines a potential asset progression: ✧ Token launch through an Elysium AMM. ✧ Liquidity development through PropAMMs. ✧ Eligible assets progressing to HyperCore spot order books. ✧ Potential further development into HIP-3 perpetual markets. This offers a route from early trading to deeper liquidity, but not every token will qualify. ▹ SECURITY AND TRUST Elysium uses canonical and mirror bridges, AnyTrust data availability and optimistic withdrawals. At launch, it relies on a single sequencer operating through Conduit infrastructure. Risks include sequencer outages, bridge vulnerabilities, data-availability assumptions and withdrawal delays. Permissionless proving and further decentralisation remain roadmap milestones. HYPE is bridged 1:1 from HyperEVM to serve as gas. The design therefore depends on execution performance and secure asset movement between both environments. ▹ THE ECONOMIC MODEL $HYPE pays network transaction fees; KNTQ is tied to Kinetiq’s broader economic model. Kinetiq has announced this sequencer-revenue allocation: ✧ 25% for builders. ✧ 25% for the treasury. ✧ 50% for KNTQ purchases, with acquired tokens sent to the Hyperliquid Assistance Fund for permanent supply reduction. Builder incentives could encourage network activity; the KNTQ mechanism links sequencer revenue to token purchases. Impact depends on revenue and adoption; price appreciation isn’t guaranteed. ▹ WHERE THE OPPORTUNITY COULD EMERGE I’d focus on: ✧ Launchpads with credible distribution and active users. ✧ DEXs and PropAMMs that retain liquidity. ✧ Trading applications using HyperCore meaningfully. ✧ Derivatives and prediction markets with genuine demand. ✧ Infrastructure supporting developers and applications. The strongest projects won’t just launch first; they’ll be the ones users need. ▹ WHAT WOULD CONFIRM THE THESIS I’d track organic transactions, repeat users, liquidity depth, application revenue, sequencer activity, successful HyperCore integration and bridge reliability. These matter more than launch announcements or speculation. ▹ THE OPPORTUNITY I wouldn’t buy every token associated with Elysium’s launch. I’d prioritise working products, demand, sustainable liquidity and clear utility. Elysium’s proposition is a high-performance EVM environment connected to Hyperliquid’s native trading infrastructure. Real adoption could create opportunity; architecture alone won’t be enough. This is my opinion based on the information I’ve reviewed, Not financial Advice
79
11
1
122
15,113
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
WOISE IS NOW LIVE ON WEEX @DexterWoise is bringing its strategy-driven futures trading approach to WEEX, backed by professional traders, algorithmic traders and quantitative analysts. New WEEX users can earn up to 10 USDT: ➤ With a Net deposit of at least 100 USDT and get 5 USDT ➤ Complete your first spot trade on WOISE/USDT, AAVE/USDT or PUMP/USDT and get 5 USDT Complete both tasks and earn up to 10 USDT! Limited-time offer. Check eligibility and terms. Campaign link: ⇩ weex.com/events/promo/wise Register on WEEX with my invite link: weex.com/register?vipCode=x2…
🤝 Paid partnership
43
2
60
11,858
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
Perp DEX activity has grown considerably, with open interest climbing towards $15B before pulling back. I find this interesting because trading volume and open interest tell us different things. Higher volume means more trades are happening, but open interest shows how much capital remains in active positions. So, an increase in trading doesn’t necessarily mean more money is entering the market. Traders could simply be opening and closing positions more frequently. I’d be cautious about treating higher volume as a sign of renewed market confidence without seeing open interest grow alongside it. For me, the real signal is not just how much the market is trading, but how much capital traders are willing to keep committed.
34
2
83
12,766
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
THE BLIND SPOT OF THE AI NARRATIVE: THE EMERGING MEV BATTLE Everyone on CT is talking about the Agentic Economy: autonomous machine networks managing capital, executing cross-protocol trades, and operating across DeFi. But there is a technical problem beneath this narrative. An intelligent agent can identify a profitable arbitrage opportunity, calculate the optimal trade, and still fail to capture the expected return. Identifying an opportunity and executing it profitably are two different problems. ✧ THE EXECUTION GAP Consider an AI agent identifying a price discrepancy between two DEXs. It submits a transaction, but another searcher captures the opportunity, liquidity changes, or slippage erodes the expected return. If exposed to a vulnerable public execution path, it may also face a sandwich attack. The model can be correct while the economics fail. This matters when evaluating market intelligence from @aixbt_agent and autonomous agent platforms such as @virtuals_io and @ai16zdao. Not every AI agent executes trades, and exposure depends on its activities and transaction pathway. ✧ THREE LAYERS THAT MATTER ⊹ Execution protection — Flashbots and @jito_labs Flashbots Protect routes Ethereum transactions through a private transaction flow, reducing exposure to public-mempool front-running and sandwich attacks. On Solana, Jito’s DontFront mechanism can constrain transaction ordering within qualifying bundles. Neither approach guarantees protection against every form of MEV. ⊹ Data verification — @primus_labs Primus’s zkTLS approach addresses verification of information originating from Web2 services. For agents relying on external data, this can help establish whether information is trustworthy. However, authentic data does not automatically protect subsequent transactions from front-running. ⊹ Agent infrastructure — @vangrid_io, @agentic_ai and @TermiX These projects belong to the broader discussion around decentralized intelligence and automated workflows. Their capabilities must be assessed individually rather than assuming they all execute financial transactions or share identical vulnerabilities. An agent’s risk profile depends on its permissions, transaction pathways, and control over capital. ✧ THE PRIVACY MISCONCEPTION Privacy is not a single security feature. Solana’s Token-2022 Confidential Transfers are designed to conceal transfer amounts and balances. They do not automatically conceal every transaction detail or prevent transaction-ordering manipulation. Similarly, private transaction submission does not guarantee favourable pricing, sufficient liquidity, or successful execution. Data verification, transaction confidentiality, and MEV protection solve different problems. Confusing these layers can create a false sense of security around autonomous systems managing real capital. ✧ WHAT WILL SEPARATE THE WINNERS I think the next phase of the Agentic Economy will depend less on agent counts and more on how reliably agents create economic value. Look beyond mindshare. Examine realised returns after transaction costs, execution failures, slippage, liquidity constraints, and risk controls. An agent that identifies ten opportunities but consistently fails to capture their value may be less useful than one that identifies fewer opportunities and executes them efficiently. The challenge is combining trustworthy data, sound decisions, and execution infrastructure that protects the value those decisions should create. I think the strongest agentic systems will turn intelligence into measurable economic results without surrendering unnecessary value during execution. The AI narrative tells us what agents might do. Their execution economics will show us what they can actually deliver. This is my opinion based on the data I’ve reviewed, not financial advice.
140
3
2
185
14,553
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
The new X algorithm engine completely changes how your posts are shared If you want more reach, focus on direct conversations and shareable utility • A Link Copy gives a +30x boost • A Mutual Reply gives a +30x boost • Negative actions drop visibility instantly More info ↓
X ALGORITHM UPDATE 🚨 X just stopped cutting new posts first, and that should help small accounts (I check it daily with Claude and share updates worth sharing with you) tl;dr: - X can only check 2,800 posts each time you open your feed - new posts used to be last in line, so they got cut first - now everything gets cut equally, new posts included - posts labeled low quality or misinfo now show a warning, and people can't like, reply or share them - no score changes this time lesson learned: your new posts now get a fair chance to be seen. Your first 2 hours still matter most. full details: - How it worked until this week Every time someone opens For You, X collects around 3,700 posts it could show them: posts from people they follow, popular posts, posts liked by similar people, and brand new posts. But X only has time to check 2,800 of them. So it just took the first 2,800 in line. Brand new posts were at the back of the line. When there were too many, they were the ones left out... and a post that never gets checked can't be shown. - What changed Now everything gets cut by the same amount. 25% too many? Every type of post loses 25%, new posts included. Nobody goes first. - Why small accounts should care Those brand new posts are under 2 hours old, with under 8 likes and under 500 views. That's where most posts from smaller accounts are. My read: they now get a fair chance instead of being cut first. How often X actually hits the 2,800 limit isn't in the code, so I can't tell you how big the difference is. - Low quality and misinfo posts now show a warning If X labels your post as low quality or misinformation, people who don't follow you see a warning on it, and they can't like, reply, repost, bookmark or share it. The code doesn't say what gets a post that label. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - a new post gets its extra push only in its first 2 hours and first 200 views, so post when your people are online - likes carry more weight than ever at 0.66 each - people sticking around pays, the time-spent score is 50% higher than two weeks ago - a read of 10+ seconds after someone opens your post adds 0.4 - the boost favors the post with the best like rate from its first viewers - accounts up to 50K can get one fresh original lifted to roughly 16th - nothing beats a copy link share, it scores 20 - replies, quotes and DM shares each score 5 - talk with your mutuals, replies between you score 20 instead of 5 - originals are the only posts that travel outside your follower base - the 1st and the 32nd like each open a new route to strangers - your 2nd post in the same feed is worth 62% of the first, so pick your best one - videos still need 10+ seconds to qualify for the video lists - earning a follow adds 4 - a pinned post with a bad link can flag the account for 7 days, worth a quick check What you should NOT be doing: - posts that get labeled low quality or misinfo now carry a warning, and nobody outside your followers can like or share them - video alone won't carry you, an open counts 0.02 and the watch 0 - hide-worthy posts cost more, "not interested" sits at -52.27 - a post at 3am burns its 2 hour window before anyone sees it - a tap that turns into a bounce is worth only 0.3 - replies and reposts don't get past your followers - insults get your post hidden from anyone who doesn't follow you - adult media in 3 of your last 5 posts puts a label on your account - disguised content in videos gets checked from 64 likes, harder at 512 - self-reply chains under big accounts risk being zeroed - one account label and non-followers stop seeing you entirely - low-rated links don't belong in your pinned post - recycled wording can get tagged as copypasta spam - strangers tagged plus a low quality link is a pattern X flags - engagement bait has no size exemption - several posts in a row end up competing with each other - hashtag stacks add nothing - bookmarks are still worth 0 - 48 hours in, For You is finished with a post
48
7
111
10,546
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
Amazing to see @Bullshot911 raise $7.7M in this current market. With Animoca Brands and P2 Ventures backing the project, plus $1M raised with @MindoAI. Bullshot is building something interesting around AI agents, token creation, and on-chain trading. If you’re into AI x crypto, go check them out: bullshot.io/ ⇩
Bullshot has raised $7.7M We’re grateful to our investors, partners, and strategic supporters for believing in our vision and backing what we’re building. Bullshot is building the next generation of AI-powered on-chain infrastructure, bringing together token creation, trading, and autonomous AI agents in one ecosystem. This milestone strengthens our commitment to building, scaling, and pushing the boundaries of what’s possible on-chain. Thank you to everyone who is part of this journey. We’re just getting started.
25
3
73
9,581
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
MIDWEEK ALPHA v.13 THE COLLATERAL RISK HIDING INSIDE TOKENIZED STOCKS. Tokenizing a stock is one thing. Making it reliable collateral in DeFi is another. On September 25, @aave launched its Equities Hub on Base, allowing eligible users outside the US to borrow USDC against seven Coinbase tokenized equities, with @chainlink providing price feeds. The supported assets are $AAPLc, $AMZNc, $GOOGLc, $METAc, $MSFTc, $NVDAc and $TSLAc, representing Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla. This connects traditional equities with onchain credit markets, but the pricing mechanism introduces a risk worth understanding before borrowing. ✧ WHEN PRICES STOP UPDATING Aave operates 24/7, while its tokenized-equity price feeds operate 24/5. During weekends and US market holidays, feeds retain their last published prices. The lending market stays active, but collateral valuations may not reflect new market information. Interest continues accruing on outstanding loans. ✧ HOW LIQUIDATION CAN BECOME A PROBLEM Imagine borrowing USDC against $NVDAc before Friday’s market close, then unexpected news pushes Nvidia’s expected value lower over the weekend. The collateral valuation may remain unchanged until the feed resumes. When a new price arrives, the borrower’s health factor could fall, potentially triggering liquidation. Liquidators must sell the collateral to recover the outstanding debt. If liquidity is thin or the executable price is lower than expected, the proceeds may not cover the loan, leaving the market exposed to bad debt. This is a potential stress scenario, not evidence that Aave has suffered such a loss. ✧ THE ALPHA: DON’T BORROW AGAINST THE LAST PRICE ALONE A collateral position can look healthy at the last reported price and become vulnerable when the market reprices. Borrow below the maximum loan-to-value limit, leave enough collateral to absorb a sharp decline, and keep funds available to repay debt or add collateral. A larger buffer reduces liquidation risk, but it cannot eliminate oracle delays or poor exit liquidity. For DeFi, this is the wider lesson: accepting traditional assets as collateral requires protocols to account for market hours, price-feed behavior and the liquidity available when positions must be liquidated. The value of the underlying asset matters. So does the system used to price and sell it when conditions change. This is my opinion based on the data I’ve reviewed, not financial advice.
44
2
98
18,151
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
MIDWEEK ALPHA v.14 THE TOKEN UNLOCK METRIC MOST TRADERS IGNORE. A $100M token unlock does not automatically mean $100M in selling pressure. But looking at the dollar value alone can hide the real risk. The question is how much new supply the market may have to absorb relative to the liquidity available to buyers. ✧ THE SUPPLY ABSORPTION TEST Before treating an unlock as bullish or bearish, I would check three things. UNLOCK SIZE VS. CIRCULATING SUPPLY A $20M unlock means something different when it adds 1% to circulating supply than when it adds 10%. The percentage tells you how much the available supply could expand. The dollar value alone does not. UNLOCK VALUE VS. DAILY TRADING VOLUME Compare the unlock’s estimated value with the token’s typical daily spot volume. If the unlock is equivalent to several days of trading, the market may need sustained demand to absorb selling without significant price pressure. This is only a stress-test proxy. Trading volume includes both buying and selling, and unlocked tokens are not necessarily sold. ACTUAL MARKET DEPTH Reported volume can look impressive while liquidity near the current price remains thin. Check order-book depth on major exchanges and liquidity in the relevant DEX pools. Estimate the price impact of the trade size you could realistically need to exit. That is closer to the real question: how much can the market absorb before your execution price deteriorates? ✧ WHY THIS MATTERS An unlock calendar tells you when tokens become available. It does not tell you who will sell, how much they will sell, or whether new demand can absorb the supply. Those are separate variables, and confusing them leads to weak trading decisions. My approach is to compare the unlock with circulating supply, test it against genuine trading activity, and inspect executable liquidity before deciding whether the event matters. The date is the starting point. The market’s capacity to absorb the supply is what deserves deeper analysis. This is my opinion based on the data I’ve reviewed, not financial advice.
73
2
107
14,849
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
Is $HYPE about to break its ATH? ICE, the company behind the NYSE, is partnering with @tradexyz to bring 24/7 perpetual futures to the US using @HyperliquidX infrastructure, subject to regulatory approval. The planned markets cover stocks, indices, commodities, FX and crypto. Here’s what makes this worth watching: ⊹ @tradexyz says its Hyperliquid markets have processed over $650B in cumulative volume in just over a year. ⊹ ICE is making a strategic investment in trade[XYZ]. ⊹ Stan Druckenmiller is joining as an investor, while Elon has also drawn attention to the announcement. This is a significant step toward connecting traditional financial markets with onchain trading infrastructure. For $HYPE, I’m watching its previous ATH around $97.98. A decisive break above that level could put it into price discovery, but the announcement alone doesn’t guarantee a breakout. Price action, volume and open interest will tell us whether buyers have enough strength to push it higher. The institutional interest is getting harder to ignore. Now the chart needs to confirm it.
trade[XYZ] and ICE, owner of the New York Stock Exchange, are joining forces to bring 24/7 perpetual futures on Hyperliquid to the United States. In just over a year, our markets on Hyperliquid have surpassed $650 billion in volume. They provide continuous price discovery for stocks, indices, and commodities, and have become trusted reference points for retail and institutions alike when traditional markets are closed. Much of the world trades them. Until now, Americans could only watch. We intend to change that. Subject to CFTC approval, trade[XYZ] and ICE plan to establish a new, dedicated U.S. market, with novel exchange and clearing infrastructure built on Hyperliquid. Planned contracts span equities, indices, commodities, FX, and crypto, with access through participating brokers and platforms. We’ll share more on products, eligibility, and timing as approvals progress. ICE brings more than 25 years of experience operating regulated markets, clearing, and managing risk. trade[XYZ] brings the product development, market design, and technology behind the most liquid and robust markets on Hyperliquid. Innovation and the protections of U.S. regulation shouldn’t be a trade-off. Together, we plan to prove it. ICE is making a strategic investment in trade[XYZ] and joins us in building towards the future of Hyperliquid. A small group of market luminaries is joining as well, beginning with Stan Druckenmiller. For more than four decades, few investors have anticipated the great turns in markets as often as Stan. We’re proud to have him with us for the next one. We’re building the U.S. market in parallel with our existing HIP-3 markets, which we’ll continue to expand and innovate on. We expect both to flourish. They each have a long road map ahead, from new asset classes to new ways to trade them. To the Hyperliquid community, whether you were here before us or came because of us, thank you. You took a chance on new markets and you made them matter. You’ll forever be a part of this story. Anything. Anytime. On ICE[XYZ].
44
2
96
16,395
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
$34.1B IN REAL-WORLD ASSETS IS NOW ON-CHAIN. HERE’S WHAT HAPPENS NEXT. I checked the October 30 @DefiLlama RWA dashboard, and the gap between tokenization and DeFi adoption is worth looking at. ↳ $34.092B total on-chain RWA AUM ↳ $30.689B active RWA AUM ↳ $4.316B DeFi active TVL ↳ $510.43M added over 30 days DeFi active TVL grew approximately 13.4% monthly, representing around 14.1% of active RWA AUM. ⊹ THE PROTOCOLS CONNECTING RWAs TO DEFI ▹ Lending: @Morpho ($891.2M), @KaminoFinance ($425.4M), @aave ($378.3M) and @eulerfinance ($96M). They provide lending markets, allowing eligible assets to support borrowing and capital allocation. ▹ Institutional credit: @GrovedotFinance ($395.1M). Grove connects capital with institutional credit and financial strategies within the Sky ecosystem. ▹ Yield trading: @pendle_fi ($363.5M). Enables users to separate and trade principal and future yield exposure. ▹ Stablecoin infrastructure: @fraxfinance ($96.7M). Provides stablecoin infrastructure supporting liquidity and settlement. ▹ Decentralized trading: @Uniswap ($77.2M). Provides exchange infrastructure for trading eligible tokenized assets. ▹ Institutional lending: @aave Horizon RWA ($122.6M) and Aave V4 ($90.1M). Horizon targets institutional RWA lending, while V4 introduces a new lending architecture. These figures represent tracked RWA-related DeFi TVL, not total protocol TVL or revenue. ⊹ THE ISSUERS MATTER TOO According to @RWA_xyz’s October 29 asset-manager data: ↳ Tether — $3.029B ↳ BlackRock — $2.874B ↳ Franklin Templeton — $2.685B ↳ Circle — $2.374B ↳ Amundi — $2.124B ↳ Paxos — $1.796B ↳ Maple — $1.243B ↳ Blockchain Capital — $940.1M ↳ Anemoy — $899.3M ↳ JPMorgan — $890.8M ↳ WisdomTree — $784.5M These figures cover different tokenized financial products, including Treasuries, private credit and other assets. The opportunity goes beyond issuing tokens. It lies in making eligible assets usable, liquid and economically productive. I’d focus on actual usage, liquidity, protocol revenue and whether that value reaches token holders. Tokenization brings assets on-chain. Utility drives adoption. Sustainable economics create lasting value. This is my opinion based on the data I’ve reviewed, not financial advice.
67
4
210
21,910
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
Are you locked in?
🤖 Made with AI
44
9
73
881
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted

23
36
1
115
19,633
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
Due to the overwhelming DM response, here are all the open roles at @TrustWallet 👇 🌍 All fully remote, global 🛠 Engineering • Lead AI Engineer (LLM & Agents) • Senior Backend Engineer (Go) • Senior Mobile Engineer (React Native) • Senior Platform Engineer • Senior Data Engineer • Design Engineer • Engineering Talent Network (for roles not listed) 📦 Product • Senior PM (Core) • Senior PM, Trading Growth (Web3) • Senior PM, Data Platform (Web3) • Project Management Officer (PMO), Web3 📣 Marketing • Product Marketing Manager 🎧 Operations • Customer Support Lead 👉 Apply directly: jobs.ashbyhq.com/trust-walle… Every application is reviewed by our team. Tag someone who'd fit, RTs appreciated 🙏
29
27
2
213
16,971
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted

1
2
68
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
Then came peace.
🤖 Made with AI
18
9
55
947
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
Who wants a @hertzflow_xyz affiliate badge? Quote this post and tell us why you’d like a badge or why you deserve to be a part of the affiliate program. #hertzflow Let’s flip the real world the crypto way
🤖 Made with AI
309
118
197
602
87,756
ℂ𝕦𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕦𝕤 👀 retweeted
SOLANA’S TOP REVENUE GENERATORS After yesterday’s post on @Solana Alpenglow upgrade, I looked at the applications generating revenue across its ecosystem. According to @DefiLlama, tracked Solana revenue reached $165.36M over 30 days. ▹ TOP REVENUE GENERATORS | 30 DAYS ⋙ @pumpdotfamily — $68.02M Generates revenue from token launches and trading fees. ⋙ @LaunchOnSF ⤚ $20.61M Monetizes token launches and trading activity. ⋙ @AxiomExchange ⤚ $15.87M Earns from trading activity on its crypto trading platform. ⋙ @Collector_Crypt ⤚ $15.63M Generates revenue from digital trading-card packs and marketplace activity. ⋙ @fomo ⤚ $12.76M Earns from token launches and related trading activity. ⋙ @Phantom ⤚ $6.34M Monetizes wallet services and trading activity. ⋙ @MeteoraAG ⤚ $5.95M Generates fees through liquidity pools and trading infrastructure. ⋙ @Raydium ⤚ $5.34M Earns trading and liquidity fees from its decentralised exchange. ⋙ @JupiterExchange ⤚ $5.17M Generates revenue across its trading and DeFi products. ⋙ @gmgnai ⤚ $5.10M Monetizes on-chain trading tools and transaction-related activity. ▹ WHAT STANDS OUT » Launchpads and trading platforms account for a significant share of the revenue among these leading applications. » Revenue does not equal profit, and applications operating across multiple networks may generate revenue beyond Solana. » Application revenue does not automatically translate into value for $SOL holders. The important factor is whether these applications can sustain their revenue beyond periods of intense trading activity. Source: @DefiLlama. Figures represent reported 30-day revenue as of October 17, 2026, and may change.
98
8
1
148
9,673