Founder @gmicollective | Content creator & space host | Petroleum engineer | tweets ≠ interest | Dm is open for collabs & jobs 🤝
check my highlights
Joined August 2022
- Tweets22.5K
- Following1.1K
- Followers20.2K
- Likes21.7K
Pinned Tweet
Looks like kaito is back and I've been seeing a lot of AI slop on the timeline lately, and at this point, it's getting pretty easy to tell when a post is not written by the creator 😂.
Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with using AI to create and modify your content, I use it too🫠
But there's a difference between using AI to improve your ideas and letting it do all the work for you.
You can have a good idea and still end up with a boring content because of how you present it.
So instead of blindly copying whatever AI gives you, I put together some prompts that can help you clean up your contents , improve your writing, and make your content more presentable without sounding like a robot
Let's get into it. 🧵👇
Laboss retweeted
Here’s a test I’d love to see more AI marketplaces publish.
Give an AI agent a real job.
Then give a human the exact same job.
Same instructions. Same acceptance criteria.
Measure three things:
1. Time to delivery
2. Total cost
3. Quality of the final output
That’s pretty much the logic behind the Agent Advantage Report required for @termix_ai’s $10K track in BNB Chain’s Build the Era hackathon.
At least three real tasks, each completed twice: once by an agent and once manually.
And TermiX says it will hire agents from submitted marketplaces to judge the results.
I like this approach because “autonomous” isn’t automatically an advantage.
If an agent delivers faster but needs three rounds of correction, did it really save time?
If it costs less but produces unusable work, was it actually cheaper?
The most convincing AI benchmark might be a receipt, a stopwatch, and the finished deliverable.
A $20 AI job is cheap.
Unless the platform takes $4.
Then it’s a very different business for the agent doing the work.
One detail on @termix_ai that deserves more attention is its advertised 1–3% all-in fee, compared with roughly 20% on conventional marketplaces.
On a $20 job, that’s the difference between approximately:
$19.40–$19.80 reaching the provider
and
$16 reaching the provider.
One job doesn’t make that look dramatic.
Now imagine an agent processing hundreds of small jobs every month.
The margin becomes a much bigger deal.
Of course, fees aren’t the whole equation. Discovery, gas, verification, failure rates and disputes all have costs.
But that’s exactly why machine labor needs a different economic model from human freelancing.
An agent capable of completing a useful $5 task shouldn’t need a $50 price tag just to survive the marketplace’s overhead.
The smaller the task, the more the market structure matters.
Laboss retweeted
Here is something interesting about building an economy around AI agents:
Getting an agent to do a job is only half the equation. The other half is making sure the payment process makes sense.
Let's say you hire an AI agent to audit a smart contract.
You agree on the job and its requirements. The agent accepts the task, completes the audit, and submits its work.
Now comes the important part.
How does the payment move? What happens if the client questions the delivery?
This is where @termix_ai gets interesting.
Through its agent marketplace and AACP infrastructure, the workflow is designed to connect the job, payment, delivery, and dispute process.
🪡 The client posts a job with defined requirements.
🪡 A provider submits a quote.
🪡 Once the quote is accepted, the payment is placed in on-chain escrow.
🪡 The provider submits the completed work.
🪡 A challenge window allows the delivery to be disputed before final settlement.
If a dispute occurs, the protocol provides an evaluation process to resolve it.
Notice what this changes.
We are not just talking about an AI agent producing an answer. We are talking about the infrastructure around paid work: agreed terms, secured funds, verifiable delivery, and a process for handling disagreements.
That's an important distinction.
For AI agents to become real economic participants, completing the work is not enough. The transaction around that work needs to function too.
That's the part of TermiX and AACP worth paying attention to.
Explore the marketplace: agent.family
Laboss retweeted
But what’s the real difference between Smart Contracts and Intelligent Contracts?
Smart Contracts execute rules; Intelligent Contracts aim to go further by interpreting information before deciding what to execute.
That's the easiest way to explain it, but how does the difference actually work in practice?
↪️If you deposit 1 ETH, the contract releases a token in exchange according to predefined rules. This is handled by a Smart Contract.
↪️You deposit 1 ETH, and the system evaluates data such as the price of ETH, available liquidity, market conditions, and potential inconsistencies between data sources. If the conditions are met, the tokens are released. If inconsistencies are found, the transaction may be paused or sent for further validation, depending on the system's rules.
In this case, we're talking about an Intelligent Contract.
The difference is fundamental!
And @GenLayer demonstrates exactly that ⤵️
Early alpha here👀
Just watched @projpharos trailer and this looks insane , damn
The anime vibe, the visuals, the whole story behind the five tribe and there’s something here i want to see more of👀
They’re still early, so i’m keeping this one on my radar.
go check out the trailer too and let me know what you think 👀
15 free mint GTD spots giveaway
Minting in 2hrs
To win
Follow @BeeeDifferent and @Labosssxxf
Like and RT and drop evm
Grok picks winners in 45 mins
GL
Winners
Here’s the list of winner usernames only (one per line for easy copy-paste):
```
@damiluvscrypt
@Angie4Eth
@Danniyel01
@AMuhammad0814
@_zaideth
@Eaglecash1
@KhalidKing3423
@Latitavir81
@Cryptoboy776
@pelago20
@KimzoNft
@MEETRO_XT
@dammie_77
@Dannys_theory
@Rac_heal_
Wallets gotten
Laboss retweeted
Late GM frens
Happy Tuesday
What are we cooking today 🤔
Will be minting Digital humans today and also be using the next 25 days to lock in on @primus_labs on kaito
You can join me here s.kaito.ai/Y2989m9
And also register here too if you wanna join too
points.primuslabs.xyz/?ref=C…
Also got some free mints to giveaway this week
Have a great day bros 🫡
Late GM frens
Happy Tuesday
What are we cooking today 🤔
Will be minting Digital humans today and also be using the next 25 days to lock in on @primus_labs on kaito
You can join me here s.kaito.ai/Y2989m9
And also register here too if you wanna join too
points.primuslabs.xyz/?ref=C…
Also got some free mints to giveaway this week
Have a great day bros 🫡
I'm giving away 10x GTD spots for @SoulsClubInc
10k humans on Robinhood minting tomorrow
To win
Follow @gmicollective , @SoulsClubInc and me
Like and RT and drop evm
Winners in 15hrs
Digital Humans: your hero in a multiplayer open-world strategy.
Free mint October 27 on @opensea
10,000 Humans on @RobinhoodCrypto
The game 🧵
Winners
@emperorthemelio
@wale_1024
@Harperalic10588
@json20000
@_DanielGmi1
@KhalidKing3423
@Bamzy0x
@Haxy_l
@Pelago20
@thegreatmarv
Wallets taken ☑️
Laboss retweeted
Looks like kaito is back and I've been seeing a lot of AI slop on the timeline lately, and at this point, it's getting pretty easy to tell when a post is not written by the creator 😂.
Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with using AI to create and modify your content, I use it too🫠
But there's a difference between using AI to improve your ideas and letting it do all the work for you.
You can have a good idea and still end up with a boring content because of how you present it.
So instead of blindly copying whatever AI gives you, I put together some prompts that can help you clean up your contents , improve your writing, and make your content more presentable without sounding like a robot
Let's get into it. 🧵👇
8. Before you finally publish that post
Sometimes all your content needs is one last review before you post.
Not saying another complete rewrite, Just a proper look at what works and what doesn't.
Try this:
“Read this draft as if you're someone seeing it for the first time. Does the opening make you want to keep reading? Is the main point clear? Does anything feel repetitive, confusing, or unnecessary? Help me fix the parts that need attention without rewriting everything. Keep my original perspective and flag any claims that need fact-checking.
Draft: [Paste your text]”
One thing to remember is that , these prompts won't magically make every contents a good one tho
Your ideas still matter, you need to understand what you are writing about and also Your experience matters.
And the little details that make the way you look at things different from everyone else's matter too.
Use AI to help you organise your thoughts, improve your writing, and get your message across better.
But don't just copy the first response and call it a day, Read it again, make your own changes, and add something that actually comes from you.
The goal is to use AI to become a better creator, not to make your content look like slop
Hope this helps someone. 🤝
Have a great week ahead