David Lane (@LaneReport) profile picture

Grew up in Cleveland, OH.

Houston, TX
Joined April 2009
Photo by David Lane (@LaneReport)Photo by David Lane (@LaneReport)Photo by David Lane (@LaneReport)Photo by David Lane (@LaneReport)Photo by David Lane (@LaneReport)
Important paper. Maybe now we can move beyond the ubiquitous bar chart.
this is fantastic - keep your readers engaged and informed!
2
215
Excellent point. Maybe more direct measures of effect size based on estimates of probability a randomly-chosen score from 1 group would exceed one from another group could aid in interpreting differences. Excellent review of common-language effect size: psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?d…
Replying to @FredOswald
• correct answer is ~45% (45.8%) • it is your best guess, but you're correct less than half the time • and this was with large d; this % would be lower for means closer together take-home message: even large group differences leave plenty of room for individual differences
2
329
Had a great chat -- thank you, Cole and Scott (Scotty!) for your engaging podcast, Directionally Correct. @Orgnostic Ep. 53 Jul 2nd, 2023 - Dr. Fred Oswald - Generative AI & The Future of Selection, by @directcorrectpa open.substack.com/pub/direct…
1
211
Sad but true.
Good statistical practice can increase your chances of being correct while decreasing your chances of being published. Conflict of interest.
1
1
149
Excellent article and everyone creating error bars should read it. Standard methods in constructing error bars often convey very little relevant information. One very poor practice among many is using between-subject error in graphics and within-subject error in inference.
1
177
Love to teach grad-level psychology quant courses, or know someone who does (please share/retweet)? Apply (by July 1) to this 2-year Visiting Assistant Professor position in our amazing Department of Psychological Sciences! apply.interfolio.com/126003 @RiceSocSci
18
26
3,896
The FDA document "Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials: Guidance for Industry" is an excellent overview of why it is important to correct for multiple comparisons when making claims based on data, and how to do so: fda.gov/media/162416/downloa…
1
17
44
11,520
Don’t do the Wilcoxon statmodeling.stat.columbia.e…
5
10
6,897
Happy Pi Day: 3/14 —> 3.14 —> 3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 . . . . . .
36
95
2
493
51,432
Unjustified assumptions of independence are the root of statistical evil.
18
4
61
16,797
correlation vs. regression PSA :)
6
15
1
115
14,176
David Lane retweeted
Methodology Trial xkcd.com/2726
27
694
75
7,900
542,965
'Begin with very simple methods. If possible, end with simple methods.' -- Sir David Cox
16
1
64
14,852
Causal quartets: Different ways to attain the same average treatment effect - goo.gl/scholar/dVbYo5 #ScholarAlerts
1
1
358
Accuracy, precision, and recall johndcook.com/blog/2018/09/0…
5
11
Sad but true.
Good statistical practice can increase your chances of being correct while decreasing your chances of being published. Conflict of interest.