Consciousness research often looks like status hierarchy, not clear science. We’ve seen this before—Marxism taught us to spot it. Nobody learns from history.
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
Will you be at the Memory Disorders meeting in Toronto. Or in Toronto? Come see Pavlov’s Dogz, the legendary brain punks you've heard so much about. Friday night at The Pilot. Get yr tix NOW!
Pavlov's Dogz
Date: Oct 23 • 19:00
eventbrite.ca/e/pavlovs-dogz…
Humanity never learns from history. Now Chalmers plays Lenin in the trade union debate—well-paid nonsense published by Nature. So it goes. #AI #Consciousness
IIT measures a correlate, not a cause of consciousness. Low Φ in AI proves nothing—nobody knows how consciousness is implemented. Don’t confuse correlation with causation.
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
"What" and "where" in frontal cortex, together again. In this case, in a relational code that ties objects to their arrangement.
A Relational Code for Objects in Primate Frontal Cortex
doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.17.…
#neuroscience
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
"WaveSpace is a modular Python toolbox for the
simulation and analysis of traveling wave dynamics in multichannel recording arrays."
joss.theoj.org/papers/10.211…
#neuroscience
IIT is pseudoscience: brain processes info physically; integrated info ≠ consciousness. Tononi’s Φ explains nothing about subjectivity. #neuroscience #IIT #consciousness
Chalmers pondered: light & sound arrive at different speeds, yet the brain perceives them simultaneously.
“Why waste a life on 50-sentence jargon and 'the hard problem'?
Dennett: “Reflecting? Occam’s razor says thoughts don't exist. It’s all just neurons.”
#philosophicalparables
We struggle to publish in Annals of Urupinsk University; Seth & co. land in Nature arguing AI can't be conscious. Intelligence≠consciousness, silicon≠meat, IIT says no. Reads like human exceptionalism. Tononi's IIT needs no vitalism. nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
Preprint author on X claims a neural correlate of consciousness. eLife editor: “proper peer review.” Author: it’s on an archive—anyone can review. Editor: not proper. Irony: eLife’s editorial culture—friends publishing friends—has credibility issues. 🧵 #eLife #PeerReview
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
Mechanistic and predictive modeling of cortical adaptation during prolonged intracortical microstimulation (in mice) abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/2… #SfN2026 #ICMS #neuroscience
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
Is it OK for an MIT professor with own lab to publish 3 review articles in 5 years and no original research? Now that we know that @DMSabatini was innocent it may not be so inappropriate to ask. Would I hurt anyone's feelings? scholar.google.com/citations…
Memories.
I demonstrated a hand-based center-out task to Russian collaborators. They implemented it but never published, so it remains up for grabs.
Lebedev: BCIs help paralysis & locked-in syndrome. Typing → Kennedy’s invasive electrodes → Utah arrays for robotic arms. Biocompatibility limits recording. AI drives decoding, feedback & auditory prostheses; Neuralink’s first implant failed in a month. youtu.be/WnoKx3ZH8VI?si=XoXC…
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
Very excited to share the most important discovery of my career yet: your brain switches between a conscious and an unconscious mode ~15 times every second. Consciousness may depend not on where in the brain activity occurs but when.
Find out more below.
bit.ly/3WvA6di
1/ We discovered something totally unexpected about the neural structure of consciousness that overturns decades of thinking on its biological basis and brings us significantly closer to the recipe for generating conscious awareness.
New preprint: biorxiv.org/content/10.64898… (led by @HesseJanis, with @FrankLanfranchi, @_conor_mcgrory, @Yuelin_Shi, and @EngelTatiana)
New preprint: neuronal avalanches—power-law cascades of synchronized activity—occur in awake macaque V1/V4, not just motor cortex. In 1,024-channel data, scaling held >10-fold and survived threshold changes but not shuffling. biorxiv.org/content/10.64898…
Activating 1–16 neurons in awake mouse visual cortex: responses follow a power law (~0.285) as single neurons—no ensemble amplification. The network still decodes who fired. Ensembles convey "who," not "how much." Near criticality, cortex scales input. biorxiv.org/content/10.64898…
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
This paper changed my life: A first glimpse into the ‘middle’ of brain processing
thetransmitter.org/this-pape…
#neuroscience










