Neuroscientist

Chapel Hill, NC
Joined March 2013
Consciousness research often looks like status hierarchy, not clear science. We’ve seen this before—Marxism taught us to spot it. Nobody learns from history.
73
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
Will you be at the Memory Disorders meeting in Toronto. Or in Toronto? Come see Pavlov’s Dogz, the legendary brain punks you've heard so much about. Friday night at The Pilot. Get yr tix NOW! Pavlov's Dogz Date: Oct 23 • 19:00 eventbrite.ca/e/pavlovs-dogz…
2
6
1
19
1,873
О нейропротезах для ног
86
Humanity never learns from history. Now Chalmers plays Lenin in the trade union debate—well-paid nonsense published by Nature. So it goes. #AI #Consciousness
147
IIT measures a correlate, not a cause of consciousness. Low Φ in AI proves nothing—nobody knows how consciousness is implemented. Don’t confuse correlation with causation.
1
2
202
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
"WaveSpace is a modular Python toolbox for the simulation and analysis of traveling wave dynamics in multichannel recording arrays." joss.theoj.org/papers/10.211… #neuroscience
1
10
19
2,117
IIT is pseudoscience: brain processes info physically; integrated info ≠ consciousness. Tononi’s Φ explains nothing about subjectivity. #neuroscience #IIT #consciousness
110
Chalmers pondered: light & sound arrive at different speeds, yet the brain perceives them simultaneously. “Why waste a life on 50-sentence jargon and 'the hard problem'? Dennett: “Reflecting? Occam’s razor says thoughts don't exist. It’s all just neurons.” #philosophicalparables
100
We struggle to publish in Annals of Urupinsk University; Seth & co. land in Nature arguing AI can't be conscious. Intelligence≠consciousness, silicon≠meat, IIT says no. Reads like human exceptionalism. Tononi's IIT needs no vitalism. nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
107
Preprint author on X claims a neural correlate of consciousness. eLife editor: “proper peer review.” Author: it’s on an archive—anyone can review. Editor: not proper. Irony: eLife’s editorial culture—friends publishing friends—has credibility issues. 🧵 #eLife #PeerReview
This is just a market for favour-currying, personal incentives, and attention-grabbing, like twitter, no? I understand that not everything requires actual peer review, but if you claim to have found consciousness, it seems like it might be a good idea.
251
Мысли вслух
112
Mechanistic and predictive modeling of cortical adaptation during prolonged intracortical microstimulation (in mice) abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/2… #SfN2026 #ICMS #neuroscience
3
1
5
377
Is it OK for an MIT professor with own lab to publish 3 review articles in 5 years and no original research? Now that we know that @DMSabatini was innocent it may not be so inappropriate to ask. Would I hurt anyone's feelings? scholar.google.com/citations…
72
115
12
1,928
529,872
Memories. I demonstrated a hand-based center-out task to Russian collaborators. They implemented it but never published, so it remains up for grabs.
1
363
Lebedev: BCIs help paralysis & locked-in syndrome. Typing → Kennedy’s invasive electrodes → Utah arrays for robotic arms. Biocompatibility limits recording. AI drives decoding, feedback & auditory prostheses; Neuralink’s first implant failed in a month. youtu.be/WnoKx3ZH8VI?si=XoXC…
168
Mikhail Lebedev retweeted
Very excited to share the most important discovery of my career yet: your brain switches between a conscious and an unconscious mode ~15 times every second. Consciousness may depend not on where in the brain activity occurs but when. Find out more below. bit.ly/3WvA6di
100
319
51
2,531
163,605
New preprint: neuronal avalanches—power-law cascades of synchronized activity—occur in awake macaque V1/V4, not just motor cortex. In 1,024-channel data, scaling held >10-fold and survived threshold changes but not shuffling. biorxiv.org/content/10.64898…
3
442
Activating 1–16 neurons in awake mouse visual cortex: responses follow a power law (~0.285) as single neurons—no ensemble amplification. The network still decodes who fired. Ensembles convey "who," not "how much." Near criticality, cortex scales input. biorxiv.org/content/10.64898…
154