Ruby

Hi dear! I'm going to reply to all three of your comments in one, because I think there are a few important things we need to clarify. First, the number of followers is not the same as the number of views or likes. These are three completely different metrics. Take my own Instagram account as an example: I have relatively few followers, yet some of my posts reach far more people than my actual follower count. That's how social media works. Content can reach audiences far beyond an account's followers ! As for your comment about Orm Kornnaphat, A video can reach millions of people without everyone liking or interacting with it. Views can include repeated plays, while reach refers to unique accounts. Lefty's also considers estimated impressions. And you can't buy impressions And personally, I don't think I'm in a position where I need to defend Orm Kornnaphat. Her name and achievements already speak for themselves. This young woman has an incredibly promising future, and I believe she's going to achieve so much more. Remember my words! Now, I'm not saying fake likes, or bots don't exist. They absolutely do, across different fandoms, including K-pop! That's precisely why platforms such as Lefty use methods to assess audience authenticity and suspicious activity. Not every suspicious interaction is necessarily eliminated, but these platforms don't simply treat every like as equally valuable. So even if someone purchases likes or views, that doesn't mean all those interactions translate into measured EMV. Second, regarding the number of posts, more posts do not mean a higher ranking. You can actually look at Lefty's London Fashion Week report. The talent ranked #2 published fewer posts than the talent ranked #4. That's a perfect example of why quantity alone doesn't determine EMV rankings. You can publish 100 posts and still generate less measured value than someone who publishes 10. What matters is the performance, reach, engagement and estimated value generated by the content, not simply how many times someone posts. Third, regarding K-pop, with all due respect, I'm a K-pop fan myself! Their global influence and position within the luxury industry are already well established. But that doesn't mean Thai celebrities cannot achieve significant international recognition too. And let me ask you something: Can bots make international magazines feature LingOrm? No. Can bots make their concerts sell out? Well, maybe bots can buy tickets too, but either way, SOLD OUT is SOLD OUT! 🤣🤣 Can bots increase Dior's or any other brand's sales because of LingOrm? No! Bots can generate likes, but they can't become real customers! And lingorm influence with sales is more than anyone imagine And remember, MIV isn't calculated based on likes alone. It measures the value of media coverage, considering who publishes the content, their influence, reach and engagement. SOV measures how much of the overall conversation belongs to them within the measured coverage, not simply how many posts they have. And already also they are on the top 😉 As for Dior, the brand has its own marketing strategy and works directly with LingOrm on their partnership. It's not my place, or anyone else's here, to lecture them or tell them how to manage it. That's not our job. I believe Dior and LingOrm understand their own partnership better than any of us. Of course, fans have played an enormous role in LingOrm's success, and we should be proud of that. Every artist has their own identity, journey and influence. K-pop artists deserve their achievements, and Thai celebrities, especially LingOrm, deserve their recognition too. Bots can inflate numbers, but they cannot manufacture editorial credibility, industry relationships or cultural relevance. And that's exactly the point of my original post. 🤍