Social and ecosystem @StarkWareLtd Crypto survivor from the 2017 wave views are my own, nfa, dyor, stay safu
Everything on Starknet 👉
Joined March 2022
- Tweets14.2K
- Following591
- Followers11.6K
- Likes27.9K
Pinned Tweet
1/ Privacy, quantum security, and Bitcoin: three of crypto’s hardest problems, representing trillions in potential economic value.
Starknet is going after all three with $STRK sitting at the center of it.
I put the entire thesis into one place:
starknetthesis.io/
Ekubo is becoming the infrastructure other AMMs build on.
Fynd’s new AMM runs on Ekubo and adjusts its fees after seeing competing quotes, aiming to win more trades and maximize LP revenue.
Already live on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and Robinhood Chain.
For Ekubo: a new channel for order flow, potentially more volume and fees, and a concrete example of teams choosing its tech to build new AMM models.
The ticker is $EKUBO.
xitter.cf/PropellerSwap/status/2…
Opus is one of the very few Starknet protocols sharing revenue with users: 75% goes to stakers.
Now you can earn your share privately, currently offering 28% APY on stablecoin.
The most underrated DeFi protocol on Starknet.
Privacy is live on Opus.✨
Borrow privately. Stake privately.
Do everything privately.
Switch on private mode and your positions sit under a shadow account, not your main wallet.
Built on Starknet’s STRK20 🥷
app.opus.money
Brother Lyskey 🥷 retweeted
propAMM on top of Ekubo
Why? If you are undercutting the competition, might as well do it on the most capital efficient DEX
Extensions make this trivial to build. You can wrap your swap in any kind of function and use a different ABI, using Ekubo's secure foundation
LPs risk very little by depositing in these custom pools on top of Ekubo (at most you lose swap fees) and it inherits Ekubo's efficient AMM infrastructure
Ethereum's Glamsterdam upgrade timeline:
→ Initially targeted H1 2026
→ Delayed to September 2026
→ Delayed again to December 2026
→ Now likely pushed to 2027
And that's just ONE upgrade.
How can anyone realistically expect Ethereum to become fully post-quantum secure by 2029 at this pace?
Especially when post-quantum security requires fundamental changes to Ethereum's cryptography.
No wonder Starknet is exploring becoming an L1, especially in an era where AI is accelerating everything.
xitter.cf/nero_eth/status/211463…
Last week, core devs had to delay forking the Hoodi testnet to Glamsterdam to study a report by @chain_security which revealed some problems with how EIP-8037 interacts with a few contracts.
Over the weekend, ppl tried to get a better picture of the impact and by now it's quite well understood. So here's what you need to know:
What's been known is that contracts which hardcode forwarded gas are affected by repricings, e.g. making state writes (SSTORE) more expensive.
What's new is that some coding patterns rely on specific invariant which were broken with EIP-8037.
Gas already spent can come back mid-tx, so gasleft() can go up. This causes two problems:
(1) a before / after gas counter underflows and reverts
(2) a failed sub-call hands gas back, so a path that should've been unreachable runs, and the tx looks like it succeeded
Related but different: (3) measuring the gas usage of a call using GAS - before and after the call - might undercount because the state gas reservoir is not visible during execution (e.g. gas_left).
It's now about deciding how to proceed. Delaying hoodi bought time but won't resolve the issue. This week, we have to dig deep into contracts and make sure nothing is missed. Eventually, this might just need some coordination among the involved parties (dapps, core devs, auditors, people running nodes, etc.), or worst-case, spec changes.
If you're an app dev or auditor, check your contracts for issues with EIP-8037/EIP-8038, and report them.
Also, share this with your favorite app dev to spread awareness.
Catch me if you can.
xitter.cf/strkworld/status/21150…
Brother Lyskey 🥷 retweeted
Market Bubble ep.24: my full conversation with @EliBenSasson - CEO of StarkWare
a post-quantum L1, the quantum threat, Zcash, the future of digital money and why Satoshi would have loved ZK
0:00 - Starkware, ZK and Starknet as an L1
3:36 - The quantum threat and Starknet's ark
7:12 - Zcash and the future of digital gold
12:16 - Supervega, Bitcoin and agent payments
16:10 - Post-quantum security, STARKs and Satoshi
Starknet has the most complete programmable privacy ecosystem in crypto.
This time, we've added support for private points trading on @arcxtrade.
Privacy everywhere, one integration at a time.
Your wallet is public. Your activity doesn't have to be.
Anyone using a Starknet wallet like @ready_co can now keep their ArcX transactions private.
Live now: app.arcx.trade
Brother Lyskey 🥷 retweeted
starknet is a dead chain with :
> close to 20% of circulating ethereum:0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766 supply natively staked and 600+ BTC staked on starknet.
> 12+ programmable private applications live on mainnet with shielded TVL.
> built from first principles based on zk starks which are post quantum secure
> stwo: the fastest prover in the world in production
> the best in class ux all possible through native account abstraction allowing web2 like ux.
> covered on google quantum labs paper.
seems dead to me tbh.
trillions
According to this bot, over 225M ethereum:0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766 was bridged to Starknet overnight.
What is happening, chat?
31,487,545 #STRK (1,454,724 USD)
0x78a...d4e3 bridged to Starknet
0x309b88f55e2a859550957d6eee027f552c3db7959e1dbbe9232e156a167b9f5
Billy, this is Starknet. It has all the attributes of an elite blockchain.
ZK-native, massively scalable, native account abstraction, programmable privacy, and aiming for full post-quantum security.
Its only defect is that CT still prices it like a random L2.
