Englishman, Writer, Lawyer, Cantab. Co-author of the @asi Freedom of Speech Bill (2026). Redrafting our constitution to fit our people, at: @ReinersProject.

Lincolnshire, England
Joined November 2018
Michael Reiners retweeted
Indistinguishable from England in 2026 The key difference being the illegality of the VPN. Half of the population are using them presently, twice the uptake of the global average to continue using services unfettered by the OSA 2023; this will Increase. Worth noting this is essentially a tax on free net use, and throttles speeds considerably in the process. Half of the population are paying, and enjoying remedial speeds as a result.
再强调一遍,浏览外网或翻墙被派出所传唤,根本不用慌。 首先是网警从流量监控系统中标记了你,然后会通知你当地的派出所片儿警将你传唤问话。 你的不当言论,会被打印出来,放在你面前。 你的手机,会要求解锁,他们会检查你在群里,聊天软件里还说了什么。 民警是很忙,但如果接到系统派发的工单,再忙也要处理,不然就一直挂在系统里,影响KPI了。 处理这种事,民警作为体制内打工人,他的自由裁量权很大的。你其实是增加他们工作量的一个小麻烦。只要好好配合,他们没必要跟你计较太多。 所以只要保证流程合规,上交资料完整,应付检查就行了。但你如果要装逼,摆出不合作的姿态,那不好意思,想整你的途径和方法太多了,哈哈。 去了之后,态度好一点,姿态低一点,开口说:“领导,不好意思,给你添麻烦了。” 然后最重要的是问话环节,他问你答。你不要没事找事,自己多说乱说。不知道、不了解、没做过的,直接就说不知道,别的一概不说。但你确实做过的,而且白纸黑字的放在你面前,那就不要抵赖。 不要说任何对抗性的言论。比如什么什么做的不对,所以我要批判。 如果你是因为不当发言被传唤,就说:“我理解错了意思,以为他在说什么,所以我才说了什么,表达有偏差。其实我不是这个意思。” 如果你是因为浏览了网站被传唤,就说我是不小心点到的,我一点开它就推送了,我也不知道为什么。 只要你态度好,把事情往小了说,一般也就是记录一下。没人愿意增加自己的工作量,对不对? 笔录确认没问题,签字盖章,这事儿就翻篇儿了。 千万不要装逼硬刚。 还有,虽然翻墙了,但什么该说、什么不该说,作为一个成年人,生在红旗下,长在春风里,接受了国家这么多年的教育,自己心里应该有点逼数。 毕竟你爸不是李刚,就算是,也不行。
1
18
73
3,122
Michael Reiners retweeted
Replying to @MCRReiners
And probably why they speak such dark warnings about “populism”. They are terrified the grift might end. And even more so that someone might hold them accountable
1
16
306
Michael Reiners retweeted
The British state has functionally outlawed being an Englishman in public, framed as combatting anti social behaviour. Ironically, it almost guarantees a further withdrawal from social behaviour. I note that there are no defences of: -joie de vivre -savoir faire As such, we might now expect rehabilitative orders and sentences of up to 2 years for being outdoors, pint in hand, and attempting to have a chat with a stranger (being an Englishman). You can all but guarantee these powers will be abused. On 4th October 2026 we saw abuse of similar in Gosport; Section 34 dispersal orders (created by the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014) gives the police and PCSOs the power to direct individuals to leave a designated area for up to 48 hours – designed for vagrants, rough sleepers and drunks/crackheads in public spaces. In Gosport, those powers were applied to the entirety of the area (population 82,000). Essentially giving police the power to move an entire town along, from their own residences. We haven’t seen such an abuse of legislation beyond its intended purpose since the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 – designed to contain remote airport and hospital disease outbreaks – was used to place the entirety of Britain under house arrest (lockdown, of 2020).
🚨 NEW: Respect Orders are now live across England and Wales People who cause harassment, alarm or distress to others can receive bans from town centres, anger management courses or unlimited fines Anyone who breaches an Order can be arrested and jailed for up to 2 years
5
28
172
10,778
Time to post my biannual “how artificially compressed are British wages”. Rising minimum wage and a 50k+ p/a tax bracket that runs to 40% of earnings, and hasn’t adjusted for inflation. This form of artificial wage compression has turned everyone in Britain into low productivity tax cattle - you have zero incentive to become anything other here. This is also a form of ambition and productivity compression. Source, ONS, Fig 5: ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabo…
🚨 NEW: John Healey will increase the minimum wage for over 21s from £12.71 to around £13.20
43
184
13
1,209
78,161
Couple that with the various layers of censorship which exclude people from public life, and oftentimes work entirely, for addressing the necessary issues, and you will start to understand what is occurring in Britain's malaise. A summary of that, here: xitter.cf/MCRReiners/status/2030…
Britain’s speech landscape has a few circles of hell that are worth note; Dante Alighieri would have blushed. It is abundantly clear why someone would operate pseudonymously in a country that is a complete stranger to the Freedom of Speech, I outline those circles of speech-hell here: 1) The Criminal law: Our most famous, is the realm of Criminal speech – here lies the Public Order Act (s.4 onward), Communications Act & OSA offences. It carries penalties ranging from depravation of liberty (as with Connolly, Wayne O’Roarke, G Linehan), to life altering fines. It is frequently exploited by activists. 2) Regulatory & Employment law: Below it lies the lesser known realm of professional regulation, with around 60 regulated professions - regulators hungrily venture into the private lives and out-of-work speech of professionals, looking to leverage the middle class into silence. For those not in a profession, your HR department functions as a micro-regulator - the tribunals will agree with them, and the FSU will often not touch anything besides an easy win (in terms of PR and law). The state of the law is not kind to their mission - given our lack of meaningful legislative protection - your speech is not protected. This eye of Sauron covers everything from MPs to unskilled care workers - our entire institutional landscape. A calculated political foe can use this against you to inconvenience your professional life and means of generating a living – the protocol of professional regulation, and the employment tribunal, will likely even thank them. 3) The final layer of this inferno; smear, calculated ostracism (defamation) and loss of opportunity. Often called cancel culture - but it is worse than that. Here lies the realm of betrayal and exploitation of the British convention of squeamishness toward any deviation from the mean. It includes, doxxing & outsourcing of harm to the mob. It is the special-interest activity of plainly partisan NGOs such as Hope Not Hate & professional activists, typically with nothing to lose themselves. It sits outside of most legal remedy available to the Englishman (defamation suits can run to 6 figures with ease in complex instances, and the Englishman is categorically a poor man now). This is why only those with tepid beliefs are able to speak without consequence, and, are invited into the limelight. The demons who who exploit this legal framework to dispose of the courageous, and exploit the natural squeamishness of the British public in doing so, would gladly kill you if they could do so and get away with it.
1
2
38
4,498
Earning 41k in a public sector role which requires no prior training (not even a requirement to become registered nurse) Somehow paying subsidised rent, so low it appears to be from the 1990s (Please refer to the ONS wage compression chart on the right)
'I'm a single mum on £41,000 and limit my weekly shop to £40.' What do you want from the Budget? bbc.in/3W7Qkt9
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Chloe earns roughly the UK median full-time salary and her south London maisonette rent is subsidised via a housing association. London private rents average £2,338 per month while general needs social rents average around £670 per month. bbc.com/news/articles/… ons.gov.uk/employmentandl… gov.uk/government/new… ons.gov.uk/economy/inflat…
23
35
3
468
37,701
Michael Reiners retweeted
House of Lords hearing today on the Online Safety Act; witnesses recommend stripping "safe harbor" immunity for compliance Kabuki + using enforcement powers more aggressively. Years ago, big American platforms rolled over when they should have fought. parliamentlive.tv/event/inde…
1
10
30
1,035
US department of education (@usedgov) has officially posted malfoid before we received any comment from @jk_rowling
There’s Magic in Learning! 🪄
1
2
5
244
Michael Reiners retweeted
Earning 41k in a public sector role which requires no prior training (not even a requirement to become registered nurse) Somehow paying subsidised rent, so low it appears to be from the 1990s (Please refer to the ONS wage compression chart on the right)
'I'm a single mum on £41,000 and limit my weekly shop to £40.' What do you want from the Budget? bbc.in/3W7Qkt9
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Chloe earns roughly the UK median full-time salary and her south London maisonette rent is subsidised via a housing association. London private rents average £2,338 per month while general needs social rents average around £670 per month. bbc.com/news/articles/… ons.gov.uk/employmentandl… gov.uk/government/new… ons.gov.uk/economy/inflat…
23
35
3
468
37,701
Two words; Human Resources Our most censorious (and indeed, censorial) are responsible for hiring & firing. Britain is tied with the Netherlands for having the largest HR sectors in the world relative to the size of its workforce.
Women being more censorious than men is a remarkably stable finding. US general social survey data from the 1970s to 2014 shows that men were around 8 percentage points more likely than women support letting a communist speak publicly, and almost 10 points more likely for a racist.
1
4
27
640
Michael Reiners retweeted
It is essential this is hammered into the minds of people who deny the existence of Britain’s sophisticated censorship framework, a framework which flows in one direction. It would take one bill to fix. Two if you wanted to deal with the NGOs. reiners.org.uk/liberty-lost-…
2
4
50
882
Michael Reiners retweeted
Britain’s speech landscape has a few circles of hell that are worth note; Dante Alighieri would have blushed. It is abundantly clear why someone would operate pseudonymously in a country that is a complete stranger to the Freedom of Speech, I outline those circles of speech-hell here: 1) The Criminal law: Our most famous, is the realm of Criminal speech – here lies the Public Order Act (s.4 onward), Communications Act & OSA offences. It carries penalties ranging from depravation of liberty (as with Connolly, Wayne O’Roarke, G Linehan), to life altering fines. It is frequently exploited by activists. 2) Regulatory & Employment law: Below it lies the lesser known realm of professional regulation, with around 60 regulated professions - regulators hungrily venture into the private lives and out-of-work speech of professionals, looking to leverage the middle class into silence. For those not in a profession, your HR department functions as a micro-regulator - the tribunals will agree with them, and the FSU will often not touch anything besides an easy win (in terms of PR and law). The state of the law is not kind to their mission - given our lack of meaningful legislative protection - your speech is not protected. This eye of Sauron covers everything from MPs to unskilled care workers - our entire institutional landscape. A calculated political foe can use this against you to inconvenience your professional life and means of generating a living – the protocol of professional regulation, and the employment tribunal, will likely even thank them. 3) The final layer of this inferno; smear, calculated ostracism (defamation) and loss of opportunity. Often called cancel culture - but it is worse than that. Here lies the realm of betrayal and exploitation of the British convention of squeamishness toward any deviation from the mean. It includes, doxxing & outsourcing of harm to the mob. It is the special-interest activity of plainly partisan NGOs such as Hope Not Hate & professional activists, typically with nothing to lose themselves. It sits outside of most legal remedy available to the Englishman (defamation suits can run to 6 figures with ease in complex instances, and the Englishman is categorically a poor man now). This is why only those with tepid beliefs are able to speak without consequence, and, are invited into the limelight. The demons who who exploit this legal framework to dispose of the courageous, and exploit the natural squeamishness of the British public in doing so, would gladly kill you if they could do so and get away with it.
Why do so many ethno-obsessives on this site operate under fake names? I mean, if they really believed their arguments were mainstream and respectable, why wouldn't they post under their own names? Could it be that they know deep down that their views are seen as extreme by the real mainstream?
7
73
6
314
20,586
Michael Reiners retweeted
“Congress should pass it now.” -@NetChoice on the GRANITE Act
The EU just fined X $140M for content that's fully legal to post in America, and nothing currently stops that judgment from being enforced in a US courtroom. The GRANITE Act would close that loophole. Congress should pass it now. 👏
1
17
81
1,578
Michael Reiners retweeted
Britain’s new minimum wage: £27,456 a year. Higher-rate income tax kicks in at £50,270. Wage compression the Soviet Union could only have dreamed of.
🚨 NEW: John Healey will increase the minimum wage for over 21s from £12.71 to around £13.20
148
736
76
9,691
892,120
Michael Reiners retweeted
With the minimum wage rising yet again, we have ended up in the position where minimum wage workers are better off financially than university graduates. The system is broken. My latest for @theipaper: inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/…
2
6
1
12
2,572
And so on, and so forth
LHA rates are not a subsidy
1
1
7
359
Michael Reiners retweeted
The worst part of that is the tiny managerial class escapes the compression. This is the late Blairism equivalent of the nomenklatura having access to the special shops that sold foreign goods.
Time to post my biannual “how artificially compressed are British wages”. Rising minimum wage and a 50k+ p/a tax bracket that runs to 40% of earnings, and hasn’t adjusted for inflation. This form of artificial wage compression has turned everyone in Britain into low productivity tax cattle - you have zero incentive to become anything other here. This is also a form of ambition and productivity compression. Source, ONS, Fig 5: ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabo…
8
18
216
6,353
In a strange case of role reversal, Mr Farage is now being forced to experience what it was like to be David Cameron in the 2015 election – wholly outflanked by UKIP who had set the agenda on the EU question – Cameron was forced to concede it to retain electoral relevance. This time, Farage has been outflanked by a successor to his own strategy – Restore –on the issue of remigration/demographic security. If Farage does not concede on it, he will go the way of Cameron in 2016. (Albeit without ever having entered office).
2
6
18
525