Republicans who refused to vote for Republicans voted for THIS:
Martin Harry retweeted
This morning, a federal court upheld Florida’s Domestic Terrorist Organization law and rejected CAIR’s attempt to stop the designations.
Great win by our Solicitor General's office and for the people of Florida!
Martin Harry retweeted
短短两年时间，川普在2024年拼出来的那套赢家联盟怎么突然散了？
所罗门把出口民调拆开看，发现两股力量正在同时往外抽血。
第一股是摇摆主力倒戈。2024年大举倒向川普的年轻男性、拉美裔选民和独立选民，这次集体向左转，甚至愿意把手里的选票投给社会主义候选人。
第二股是保守派基本盘拒绝出门。出口民调显示，长期为共和党兜底的福音派选民投票率大幅下滑，年轻保守派选民以及2024年被查理·柯克动员起来的青年选民，数据全都明显往下掉。
看到左翼候选人接连报捷，MSNBC等左派媒体立刻在节目里欢呼，说美国人终于开始拥抱社会主义了。
所罗门指出了一个完全相反的底层事实。全美民调和出口数据都表明，美国大众依然反感社会主义。特别是今晚大批离开共和党的拉美裔选民，在家庭观念、堕胎议题和小企业经营上依然非常传统，骨子里对社会主义抱有极强的不信任。
既然讨厌社会主义，为什么要选社会主义者上台？
答案只有两个字：账单。选民根本没有爱上左翼意识形态，他们只是觉得眼下的经济没有修好，用选票向执政党发泄愤怒。
把这群选民推向对立面的第一记重锤，是中东战火引发的高油价。
所罗门在复盘时直言，川普凭直觉介入中东冲突的决定，直接推高了美国国内的汽油价格。再加上部分地区新建数据中心推高了下游用电与生活成本，冲着改善生活而来的工薪阶层、拉美裔和年轻男性最先感受到钱包缩水。当初承诺要压低物价、结束海外泥潭，一旦日常加油和生活成本失控，这批对价格最敏感的选民转身就走。
如果说油价打散了摇摆选民，那候选人提名上的失误就直接冻住了党内基本盘。
最典型的例子就是南卡罗来纳州的参议员席位。如果让拥有扎实基层网络、受保守派选民认可的拉尔夫·诺曼出战，共和党原本可以稳稳拿下州长和参议员双席。但福克斯新闻主持人肖恩·汉尼提等人非要力推另一名参选意愿勉强的候选人，以此向建制派参议员林赛·格雷厄姆致敬。
问题是，格雷厄姆因为极力主张卷入中东战事，早就和党内的反战保守派闹得水火不容。把一个带着格雷厄姆标签的候选人硬塞给选民，直接浇灭了基层保守派和青年选民出门投票的热情。
所罗门由此给出了一个判断：靠福克斯新闻的电视名嘴定调、靠传统福音派选民无条件买单的旧共和党时代，已经彻底结束了。
这场蓝潮并没有永久改写美国的政治版图，它只是选民对当前生活成本和背离竞选承诺的一次集中抗议。距离2028年大选还有时间重整旗鼓，但前提是共和党必须听懂今晚选票传递的信号：停掉拉高油价的海外冲突，放弃电视圈内定候选人的老路，重新回到以工薪阶层、拉美裔和年轻人账单为核心的经济优先路线上来。
Martin Harry retweeted
Lmao. The @statesman is a fraud.
I’m actually a lifelong Democrat who voted Republican this time for the first time in my life. Not to “save” my party—I’m done with the left and there’s absolutely no saving it.
@TexasGOP 🫡
Her husband is an advisor to the Texas Democratic Party.
Open Secrets shows Kurt Bardella has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Democratic Party.
Why didn't you disclose this information, @statesman?
Martin Harry retweeted
Hi @UMich i just want to be absolutely explicitly clear that NO, this video of your student committing Assault & Battery, resisting arrest, making death threats, & engaging in Anti Semitism ON CAMPUS is NOT coming down.
In fact, on behalf of @camhigby & others who were assaulted & threatened on your campus with your consent, & protection, I’m going to reshare it here.
And I’m going to tag some friends with reach to make sure it keeps going. Here. On telegram. On facebook. On Rumble. On YouTube. On Truth Social.
Remember, you asked for it.
@drawandstrike @willchamberlain @MattMorseTV @AAGDhillon @AndrewKolvet @AGToddBlanche @MrAndyNgo @catturd2 @EricLDaugh @FBIDirectorKash @EagleEdMartin @elonmusk @NickJFreitas @KurtSchlichter @libsoftiktok @nicksortor @RonColeman @StephenM @jenvanlaar
Its only fairthe rest of the world learns you’re desperately trying to hide this, @UMich especially from the Justice & Education departments.
cc @EDSecMcMahon @usedgov
🚨🚨 I have just been informed by @ReawakenUSA CEO @realjamesowen that he was called by @UMich and asked to have my video of yesterday’s attack removed due to negative blowback on lunatic, Temulun Togochog
I’ll repost it every day until she’s expelled and charged.
Martin Harry retweeted
No matter what happens today in Texas, we won't have this thing in the Swamp anymore.
Martin Harry retweeted
Yeah, I don’t think John Cornyn would win had he been the nominee. AtlasIntel or not, 17% approval rating is downright brutal.
Vote for Paxton tomorrow so we have a mandate to keep ousting weak Rs in 2028. You don’t win by losing!
4⃣ TEXAS APPROVAL RATINGS
All six political leaders and congressional delegations tested register net-negative approval ratings in Texas.
Approve / Disapprove
🇺🇸 Donald Trump: 44% / 53%
🔴 Greg Abbott: 43% / 53%
🔴 Ted Cruz: 45% / 53%
🔴 John Cornyn: 17% / 67%
🔴 Texas House Republicans: 43% / 52%
🔵 Texas House Democrats: 41% / 50%
Martin Harry retweeted
PLEASE SHARE:
@KUT, if you’re going to publish a story titled “What really happened?” perhaps you should start with what the courts actually ruled.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals did NOT find Allen Causey actually innocent. The courts explicitly stated that actual innocence had not been established. His conviction was overturned on a different legal basis involving the State’s unknowing use of false testimony. Those are two very different things.
Mr. Ware (Innocence Fraudject), four separate courts have now rejected the claim that Allen Causey established his actual innocence. Yet you continue presenting your fairy tale version of events as though it were an established fact. It isn’t. At what point does your narrative give way to what the courts actually ruled?
KUT should have known better than to publish these assertions without checking the court record.
The district court judge described the evidence against the other individual as compelling, but made clear that this did not negate Causey’s possible participation. He was an additional suspect, not proof of Causey’s innocence.
The Polanco coercion claim was dropped by Causey’s own defense. It was not pursued and was not considered by the court. Why include it without explaining that???
And DA @JosePGarza’s subsequent dismissal of the murder charge was a prosecutorial and political decision, NOT a judicial finding of innocence.
These aren’t minor technicalities. They are fundamental facts of this case. Anita Byington and her family deserve accurate reporting, not a selective retelling that blurs the distinction between an ordering of a new trial and a finding of actual innocence.
If you’re going to tell readers what really happened, report the whole story.
Also, considering that this article was about me and the ad I participated in, why was I not contacted for a response to DA Garza’s claims? This is unacceptable, and I am demanding that the appropriate corrections be made ASAP.
I expect to hear directly from KUT management or an appropriate editorial decision-maker regarding these serious concerns. @England_Weber @corriemac @BenPhilpottKUT
Gov. Greg Abbott says Travis County's district attorney failed to keep a murderer behind bars. An opinion from the state's conservative Court of Criminal Appeals paints a different picture. kut.org/crime-justice/2026-1…
ALT Gov. Abbott cites 1991 Austin murder case in 'tough on crime' campaign ad. What really happened?
KXAN must run an apology and correction immediately. Their biased report is egregious.
PLEASE SHARE:
KXAN, is it normal journalistic practice for your publication to give DA Jose P. Garza a platform while not giving the other party an opportunity to respond?
Also, there are numerous factual errors in your story that must be corrected as soon as possible.
For starters, you call Allen Causey “exonerated.” That never occurred. A new trial was ordered. That does not equal exoneration.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals explicitly said it did NOT find evidence that Causey was actually innocent. It set aside his conviction and ordered a new trial—not a judicial declaration of innocence.
Strangely, KXAN claims the court deemed his confession “false testimony” because of Sgt. Polanco. That is not what the court’s ruling says. And CAUSEY’S OWN DEFENSE DROPPED THE POLANCO ISSUE before the decision. Any cursory review of the court records would make this clear. So, you FLAT-OUT LIED in this article. You believed DA Garza’s blathering story without bothering to check the facts. Yikes.
These errors and omissions fundamentally distort the case and change the meaning of what actually happened. Rather than independently examining the court record and presenting an accurate account, you are repeating DA Garza’s fairy tale version of events as fact.
Journalism requires verification, not simply providing a platform for one side to tell its story unchallenged. And I resent that nobody was contacted to speak up for Anita Byington and for justice.
I don’t know who is in charge of KXAN’s reporting on this matter, but I expect to hear from someone at your publication very soon. These inaccuracies must be addressed, and your readers, and especially Anita Byington, deserve a correction.
@taylorgirtman @HarleyTamplin @chelsea_dear @NeasNews @KXAN_News
PS. Is @hollyshansen from @TheTexanNews the only reporter capable of covering this case correctly? 🤔
Finally, some judicial restraint.
news.bloomberglaw.com/litiga…
Martin Harry retweeted
I've known @jamestalarico for nearly 20 years. When we were at @UTAustin in 2009, he ran the University Democrats and I ran the College Republicans. Although we disagreed, I once considered him a friend. But then he betrayed the entire student body for his own political gain.🧵
Luna, a small dog missing for over a month in Yellowstone, is reunited with her owners apnews.com/article/yellowsto…
These Texas media are openly Dem partisan, propaganda, sources pretending to be professional news reporters. They'd rather conceal the truth than report it if it harms their political interests.
Hi @FBugenhagen_ and @adjectivejules since you “caught up” with James Talarico I’m curious why your story has the exact same excerpts as @kissphoria (Houston Choronicle) which are Talarico saying he attends ACL every year and is super excited to see Natasha Bedingfield. It seems to me like the Talarico campaign reached out to the Austin American Statesman and Houston Chronicle, told you to come take a staged photo opp of Talarico shaking hands at ACL, he then didn’t take any questions or do any interviews with you guys and instead gave you all the same dumb statement about loving ACL and what musical act he’d like to see.
Does that feel like journalism to you?
A nominee for the U.S. Senate in Texas was off the campaign trail for 13 days with less than a month until the general election and you guys represent the largest papers in Texas and you just show up and follow Talarico around like he’s Bono, get to ask him no questions and then put out the exact same reporting from what appears to be a 1 minute joint encounter with Talarico where he took no questions.
chron.com/politics/article/t…
statesman.com/news/article/j…
How is it that demands for retirees to lose benefits to which they are entitled is reasonable but asking younger Americans to contribute more to sustain the program is an outrage?
Martin Harry retweeted
Gina Hinojosa’s campaign is spiraling – they're trying to censor our TV ad uncovering Gina’s 40 votes to RAISE your property taxes by sending cease and desist letters to Texas TV stations.
Gina can try to censor her record, but she can’t erase it.
This is the ad Gina doesn’t want you to see ⬇️
Martin Harry retweeted
Five years ago, Attorney General Merrick Garland issued an infamous memorandum at the urging of the National School Boards Association and White House officials, directing the FBI and United States Attorneys to consider looking for a federal hook to prosecute parents exercising their right to free speech.
Today, we are releasing the “Report to Expose the Weaponization of Government Against Parents in Schools” which details Weaponization of the Department against these parents — from attempting to get the National Security Division involved to ignoring repeated warnings from employees that leadership’s actions could be unconstitutional.
Along with the report, we’ve released hundreds of exhibits and emails that make official and verify what many Americans had guessed: the Garland DOJ worked hand in hand with WH officials and the National School Boards Association to chill free speech and parental rights while they threatened to prosecute parents and label them domestic terrorists.
Read the full report and our remedies here: justice.gov/opa/media/146420…
Fink adds "context" to the Paxton ad but simply quotes Talarico. The bias is obvious. @cbs11jack
UPDATE: @jamestalarico responds to new @AngelaPaxtonTX ad. “Asking Texans to close their eyes and vote for a political party instead of the best person for the job is exactly what’s wrong with today’s politics… My team isn’t any political party. My team is Texas.”
@CBSNewsTexas