✨Golden Parenti✨

A summary of @InfraHaz political analysis of the next two years of American politics: - There are no allegations of voter fraud by Trump. - Hasan admits that he used the MAGA Communist strategy to get the Democrats elected. - In 2024, there were 3 forces in American politics: the Democrats, the Republicans, and MAGA. MAGA was objectively distinct from mainstream republican politics. -The DNC represents the hegemony as a balance of power, including all of the major media and academic institutions. These institutions have been severely disrupted by technology. The GOP, on the other hand, represents the “new money” which attempts to bypass the ruling class hegemony to offer an alternative vision for the empire. The DNC has an orthodox imperialist approach. The GOP has a heterodox, and speculative approach. The DNC is closely connected to the Anglo-Atlantic elites, including Jews who are a part of that elite. The GOP is much more influenced by Eastern European oligarchs, including Eastern European Jews. Many of these Eastern European oligarchs are aligned with Silicon Valley and the Likud Party in Israel. They tend to want Russia to return to the neoliberal order, ruled by the oligarchy (pre-Putin, and pre-2014). - People think of the Republicans as being conservative, and the Democrats as being liberal. But structurally speaking, the Democrats are conservative, and the Republicans are simply indiscriminately corrupt and politically speculative. - Because of this dynamic, it makes sense that Silicon Valley would ultimately align with the Republicans, even though, historically, they have been seen as being integrated with the DNC in the past; they are new money, looking to run the empire on their terms, and they are connected to Eastern oligarchs. - The DNC enforces alignment with a particular way of running the hegemony. This means that they take bribes only discriminately, in a way that is in alignment with that way of doing things. The GOP, on the other hand, is indiscriminately corrupt. - Because the GOP is indiscriminately corrupt, once the time came for the hegemony to confront the emerging regional powers in the Middle East, under George W. Bush, the oil oligarchs were able to be empowered in a way that they would not have been under the Democrats. Neoconservatism was a speculative project that required the backing of new money (the oil oligarchs) to be successful. - Prior to Trump, Obama had succeeded in creating a uni-party by partnering with the pro-tech Republican Paul Ryan, who was the Congressional leader during his first term. It is for this reason that Mitt Romney did not run against him as a conservative, but simply as a different take on the same uniparty; by that point, there was no real distinction in kind between the DNC and GOP. - Trump was initially independent of the Republicans, and ran on populist themes. However, once he began to gain popularity, the Adelsons took an interest in him, and began to back him. The Adelsons are connected to Likud, and are not interested in the DNC strategy towards Iran, which involves the JCPOA, and attempts to topple the Iranian regime through color revolutions. Instead, they favor direct military confrontation with Iran to directly topple the Iranian regime through military force. Because he was the only real alternative to the uniparty, the Adelson’s saw him as their only opportunity to breach the uniparty stance on Iran. - Because of their speculative backing, in addition to his popular momentum from Occupy Wallstreet, the disgruntled Bernie Bros, and the Tea Party, Trump was able to win the election. Once he won, the GOP folded to him specifically because of the influence of the Adelsons and their allies. - Once in office, Trump got rid of all of his heterodox influences, e.g., Roger Stone, and appointed a neocon administration. - Although Trump did not govern as a populist, nevertheless, the uniparty unraveled under his leadership, because the governing philosophy of the DNC led hegemonic system reached a crisis and imploded due to his leadership. “Wokeness” reached its zenith under Trump because of that crisis, and has subsided since then; not because Trump was an enemy of the ruling class, but because he implemented an entirely different approach to pursuing the interests of the hegemony. - Under Trump, a populist conspiratorial movement begins to take shape, which grew out of MAGA, Q-ANON, Occupy Wallstreet, which was independent of Trump himself, and this eventually grows into a renewed third party movement. After 10/7, anti-Zionism explodes under Biden. - Because of the development of this new third party, Trump wins again as an alternative to Biden. Trump, this time, is also backed by Silicon Valley, because, under Biden, they became the subjects of major scrutiny as a result of the heightened conflict between the old money of the DNC, and the new money, of which Silicon Valley is a part. This conflict was greatly heightened by the onset of AI, which disrupted many of the media institutions of the DNC. At the same time, Trump was being prosecuted, and was facing jail time. Part of the reason Trump was able to return to power was because, under Biden, there was a resumption of support for the JCPOA/color revolution strategy with respect to Iran. So the Adelsons used their influence to not only keep Trump out of jail, but also, in conjunction with Silicon Valley and the new third party momentum, return him to power. - Without the backing of the Republicans, under the direction of the Adelsons and other Jewish oligarchs, Trump will go to jail. This is a form of blackmail and leverage that the Jewish oligarchs have over Trump. It is for this reason that Trump MUST invade Iran. - Trump’s strategy with respect to BRICS in general is markedly different from the DNC and the GOP mainstream. He is fundamentally friendly to Putin, Xi, Kim, etc. However, this is tolerated by the oligarchs because their priority is war with Iran, which is not only the preferred strategy of the Adelsons, but is also existentially necessary for Netanyahu and Israel, both of which need that war to survive; or else they will dissolve due to internal and external pressures. So his warm attitude, in general, towards BRICS, is tolerated, so long as he wages direct war against Iran. - In order for popular movements to exert political pressure, they must be constituted and organized, typically through trade union movements. If they don’t, then they are not able to enforce their will on the political class. The union movement in the US has been captured by the DNC, which is to say, the mainstream hegemony. There never was any real organization of the popular movements which got Trump elected, and, for that reason, Trump never had the ability to fulfill his popular mandate in his first term. - However, Silicon Valley has some sympathy for Trump’s stance towards Russia and China, because they feel that, so long as they can maintain a technological edge, they will be able to use that edge to contain China and Russia, rather than have to confront them directly, which result in a significant amount of destruction and cost. However, this also puts them at odds with the Adelsons and the Zionists, because they also feel this way with respect to Iran. - Because Silicon Valley is at odds with the Adelson faction, and because the Adelsons have leverage over Trump, the Silicon Valley faction gets sidelined once Trump comes to office for his second term. Instead, figures like Rubio and Hegseth are at the helm, who are in line with the Zionist agenda, along with the mainstream GOP. It is also for this reason that the Trump administration is extremely corrupt and criminal; so long as he prosecutes war with Iran, the Adelson faction will protect him from prosecution. - It is important to note that the people now controlling Trump through blackmail HAVE NO LONG TERM PLAN. They are merely trying to preserve Israel in the immediate term, and take out Iran as an immediate goal. - This leaves the Silicon Valley faction highly disgruntled with the Trump administration. So, for this reason, figures like Tucker Carlson, who is friends with JD Vance, who is a protege of Peter Thiel, have turned on Trump. In general, they are now using their influence to rebuild a counter-Trump popular movement; particularly through the X platform. They are doing this, not to fully break with Trump or the hegemony, but to “not put all of their eggs in one basket,” and create an alternative political movement as a hedge against the current political factions. - In 2026, the DNC, observing all of this, changes its strategy by adopting MAGA Communism via successful DSA figures like Mamdani and Hakan Piker. “Oh, Trump you promised no more wars. Oh, Trump, you’ve made life unaffordable.” They now are now deemphasizing foreign wars, wokeness, etc., which were the mainstays of the pre-MAGA DNC. Now, when candidates like Abdul Al-Sayed are asked about wokeness and transgenderism, their response is “These are distractions from things like cost of living, healthcare costs, and other things that really matter.” The backing of El Sayed came from the very top of the leadership of the DNC. But a consequence of this, is that, now, the DNC politicians are now being bribed indiscriminately, indicating that the DNC no longer has a comprehensive, uniparty, hegemonic agenda. Effectively, the DNC as we knew it no longer exists, and is not unified in any way; they are now effectively indistinguishable from the pre-Obama GOP. There is now an anarchy of competing interests. - Consequently, what we can now expect is that the divisions between the old money, new money, and Silicon Valley components of the ruling class, are now going to accelerate in an unprecedented way moving forward; particularly considering that one of the mandates of the DNC has been to restrain the development of AI. - The DSA wing of the DNC is now the only faction that has the ability to restore a consensus within the DNC. Because the DSA is the only thing that actually sets the DNC apart from the GOP. However, the DSA contains a significant amount of ideological ambiguity and division; they are not as pro-Ukraine or pro-NATO as the legacy DNC. - Bear in mind that, in Germany, the Social Democrats gave rise to various other movements, including both the Communists, and Hitler. Therefore, the DSA is likely to give rise to Logo’s “Millennial Reich.” As the divisions within the DNC accelerate, the non-DSA DNC will become increasingly indistinguishable from the GOP, while the DSA will continue to be the only unifying consensus within a party that is increasingly merely speculative bribe takers. - Because of this dynamic, the mainstream DNC, e.g., Hakeem Jeffries, is not aggressively against the war with Iran. They are calling for peace, but not in any way that is significantly different from the way in which Trump is doing so. The key is that any peace deal they will agree to will stipulate that Iran must not develop nuclear weapons. Iran cannot agree to this because, given the fact that the Trump administration murdered the Ayatollah, they cannot sell such a deal to the Iranian people. - The legacy DNC, therefore, cannot just walk away from the Middle East. BUT THE DSA CAN. THE DSA CAN DEMAND THAT WE STOP THE WAR AT ALL COSTS AND FOCUS ON DOMESTIC POLICY. - If the DSA pursues this strategy, Trump will not stand in their way, because Trump’s only fear is going to prison. Trump still must be nominally aligned with the GOP, however, if there is infighting among the DNC, he will not go to jail under a DNC led Congress. - Trump loves Mamdani. - There is the potential for there to be a Lassalle-Bismark quasi-cooperative dynamic between the DSA and Trump. - Will the DSA fall in line with Hakim Jeffries and prosecute Trump, or will they demand peace with Iran? If the former, then Trump will lean on the GOP and Silicon Valley, who cannot allow a unified DNC to challenge their pro-AI agenda. Or. Trump will lay down and die like a dog. However, even if that happens, the breakdown of the hegemony and the political ambiguity within the DSA, as well as the increasing security breaches that are taking place will make orderly governance impossible over the next two years.