Confidently incorrect about everything. 🧠➡️🗑️ | Professional Normie
Dallas, TX
Joined July 2026
- Tweets205
- Following160
- Followers20
- Likes15K
Pinned Tweet
Nick Fuentes is the unapologetic spearhead of the young White Christian Male awakening. His unflinching rejection of jewish subversion, degenerate culture, and feminist poison isn't "hate", it's necessary surgery.
Groypers aren't incels; they're the vanguard of a generation refusing to be emasculated by soy, porn, and jewish media. Nick's raw truth-telling on race, identity, and power is what the GOP's cuckservatives can't stomach.
When he endorses a dark horse candidate in 2028, it won't be some milquetoast "America First" grifter, it'll be a Nationalist Patriot who shares his vision for America FIRST.
The parasite class will shriek about "antisemitism" and "hate speech," but Nick's army knows the truth: this is a war for our very existence.
Blake retweeted
“If you don’t support Israel you can’t use any of our inventions”
Oh no whatever am I to do without pornhub and transgenders
These guys say this all the time and have yet to use them.
They've been attacked several times and haven't done anything. I hate the nothing ever happens guy, he's always right.
🇮🇷|MACH 7. THE INTERCEPTOR DOES NOT EXIST.
IRGC Aerospace Advisor, Brig. Gen. Balali:
"Our missiles hit at Mach 7. To stop them, the enemy needs even faster interceptors."
Read that sentence again. It is not a threat. It is a physics problem Washington cannot solve.
What Mach 7 Means
Mach 7 is 7 times the speed of sound. Roughly 8,640 km/h. 2,400 metres per second. 2.4 km every single second.
At that speed, a missile crosses the Strait of Hormuz in under 60 seconds. It crosses from launch to Tel Aviv in under 7 minutes. It crosses from launch to a carrier in the Gulf in under 90 seconds.
There is no human reaction time for that. There is only a machine that must see it, track it, calculate an intercept, launch, and hit a target moving at 2.4 km per second while that target is maneuvering.
That machine does not exist in the American inventory.
Why Interceptors Fail
American air defence is built for a different war.
Patriot PAC-3: Designed for Mach 3-4 ballistic missiles on a predictable arc. Against a maneuvering hypersonic glide vehicle, its kill window collapses to seconds.
THAAD: Designed for high-altitude exo-atmospheric intercept. Against a missile that stays low, glides, and changes course in the atmosphere, it is chasing a ghost.
Aegis SM-3 / SM-6: Designed for ships. A ship that must first detect, then track, then fire, while the missile is already inside its radar horizon. In the Strait, the horizon is 30 km. At Mach 7, that is 12 seconds.
To stop a Mach 7 maneuvering missile, you need an interceptor that flies at Mach 9-10, with a seeker that can survive plasma heating, with a datalink that can update in real time, and with a launcher that is already pointed in the right direction.
The US does not have it. Israel does not have it. No NATO state has it.
Balali did not say "we are strong." He said: your defence needs to be faster than our offence. It is not.
The Missile Behind the Quote
Balali is Aerospace Force advisor. He is not talking about a single system. He is talking about a family:
Fattah-1 and Fattah-2: Hypersonic glide vehicles, maneuverable in atmosphere, presented as unstoppable because they do not follow a ballistic arc.
Kheibar Shekan / Haj Qasem: Solid-fuel, maneuvering re-entry, designed to defeat Patriot batteries by changing trajectory in terminal phase.
Sejjil / Emad: Longer-range, high-speed re-entry, with decoys and maneuvering warheads.
All of them share the same logic: speed + maneuver = no intercept.
The 56 MQ-9s downed, the 6 MQM-170s harvested by electronic warfare over Qeshm, the 2 LUCAS drones seized those were the slow war. Balali is talking about the fast war.
What the Enemy Already Learned
The record is the receipt:
Ain al-Asad, 2020: Missiles hit despite Patriot presence. No intercept claimed.
Negev / Ramon / Tel Aviv, April and October 2024: Missiles penetrated Iron Dome, David's Sling, Arrow-2/3, THAAD, and Aegis. Videos showed impacts on airbases.
Hormuz, November 2026: Two tankers hit after violating the closure. No US Navy intercept stopped it. CENTCOM's attempts ended in humiliating defeats, in the IRGC Navy's words.
Fattah-2 test: Iranian state media: cannot be intercepted by any existing defence system. Washington never produced a video proving otherwise.
Balali is not announcing a new weapon. He is announcing that the old excuse "our defences will protect you" is finished.
The Doctrine
"Any helper becomes a legitimate target."
"Response will not be geographically limited."
"Geography will no longer have meaning."
That is the same week as Balali's quote. The Aerospace advisor gives the speed. The General Staff gives the geography. The Quds Force gives the front: Hormuz + Bab el-Mandeb as one front.
Mach 7 is the speed of that doctrine.
Honor and Integrity are a virtuous milestone around the necks of White men.
This nature is inherent in our people.
It is necessary, however, that White men become savage.
It is that possibility that terrifies them.
I would sincerely prefer Iranian sharia law over this jewish rule we have now.
At least then we don’t have to listen to dumb bitches.
Abbot was a weak and pathetic Boomer like all of them.
He could have gone full dictator on the border, locked up corrupt politicians in the democrat cities, and arrested business owners that hire illegals.
Had he done any of that, he would have statues made across the state.
Instead, he went to pagen diwali ceremonies.
He burned this state to the ground. TBD
Understand the implications of what happened in Texas last night.
Gina Hinojosa has called on Gov. Abbott to end state & local cooperation with ICE & she can order that on day one.
Hinojosa voted against the 2017 SB 4 as a TX state rep. The bill was essentially a sanctuary cities ban and required TX law enforcement to cooperate with ICE detainers. She then voted against another SB 4 in 2023, which made it a state crime to cross illegally into Texas.
Should there be another border crisis in coming years, there will likely be no resistance from Texas at the border. No Texas DPS, no TX National Guard, no razor wire or water buoys, and no Operation Lone Star, which Hinojosa called a “dog and pony show” and “political theater”.
Remember when 15,000 Haitians surged illegally into Del Rio, TX in 2021 under the international bridge? That was only stopped because Texas DPS responded on Abbott’s orders and physically blocked further crossings by lining up their cruisers to form a wall. The Biden Border Patrol was caught off guard and offered almost no resistance, except for some horseback agents who were falsely slandered for “whipping”.
Additionally, because Republicans failed to pass any legislation codifying President Trump’s border security measures, if Dems take the White House in 2028, that Dem president could, if he/she wants to, reverse every single Trump border security policy immediately upon taking office because they were all done at the executive level, and they can order Border Patrol to go back to a passive catch & release policy like we saw under Biden.
1/2:
DEAD SERIOUS
I just got off the phone with a tech bro at
Anthropic, I have a separate contact at Microsoft... they both agree and what they said is insane. You think the prep for 90 days is just online chatter or fear mongering from the this or that... shit I WISH
I don't support a social media ban for minors.
I DO support a social media ban for women.
A historic perspective:
Traitors were subjected to torture mainly because treason was treated as the supreme political crime: an attack on the sovereign, the state, or the community’s survival, not an ordinary private wrong.
Rulers and legal systems used extreme bodily punishment for a mix of practical, symbolic, and deterrent reasons that were widely accepted in the societies that practiced it.
Loyalty to the ruler or the polity was a foundational duty. Breaking it threatened civil war, foreign invasion, or the collapse of order. Roman law treated certain forms of betrayal (perduellio, maiestas) as offenses against the res publica; medieval and early-modern European law ranked high treason above murder. Chinese imperial codes likewise placed plotting against the emperor among the “ten abominations,” crimes that justified the harshest penalties and often collective punishment of kin. Because the offense was political, the response was meant to reassert the authority that had been challenged.
Torture served several overlapping functions:
• Extraction of information. Conspiracies were hard to prove and often involved hidden networks. Judicial torture (or extra-judicial interrogation under threat of it) was used to force confessions, names of accomplices, and details of plots. English treason trials, Spanish Inquisition proceedings against political or religious enemies of the crown, and Ottoman and Chinese interrogations of rebels all show this pattern. A confession also supplied the formal legal basis for conviction in systems that prized it highly.
• Public deterrence and spectacle. Executions were staged so that large audiences would see the cost of betrayal. English hanging, drawing, and quartering (codified for high treason in the 14th century and used into the 18th) displayed the body being mutilated; the head and quarters were often exhibited on gates or bridges. Similar logic appears in Roman damnatio and public executions, in French ancien-régime punishments for lèse-majesté, and in the display of rebel remains in various Asian empires. The message was that the traitor’s body, honor, and lineage could be destroyed.
• Symbolic annihilation of status. Traitors were frequently noble or office-holders whose betrayal was especially dangerous. Degradation rituals—stripping of titles, inversion of heraldic symbols, dismemberment, or denial of honorable burial—marked them as outside the political community. Pain and mutilation reinforced that exclusion.
• Retribution and restoration of order. In societies that understood crime as an injury to the sovereign or the cosmic/social order, proportional severity was expected. Mercy was possible (and sometimes politically useful), but the baseline penalty for proven high treason was deliberately worse than for ordinary homicide.
If you haven’t left a comment, what are you even doing?
🚨 DHS is now taking public comments on its proposed new H-1B fee.
This is your chance to put something on the official record.
If you believe employers should have to seriously recruit Americans before hiring H-1B workers, SAY IT.
If you want stronger audits, better enforcement, real documentation of U.S. applicants, and more accountability, SAY IT.
If you want a higher fee, SAY IT.
Public comments matter because agencies are required to review and respond to significant issues raised during rulemaking.
Don’t just complain on X.
Put your argument into the federal record.
Comment deadline: September 24.
Docket: USCIS-2026-0298
federalregister.gov/document…
Our ancestors were right about everything and and everything that we’re told that was wrong with our ancestors is a lie.
Women were never oppressed. There was NO oppression. What women call oppression today was just PROTECTION.
Let me break it down for you:
1. VOTING:
Women say "we couldn't vote." But back then, voting was not a right, it was a RESPONSIBILITY. Only people who owned property, paid heavy taxes, held public office, or were drafted to DIE in wars could vote.
100% of the people dying in wars were men. You want to vote to send men to war, while you sit at home safe? Makes zero sense. Voting was linked to the DRAFT. You vote, you go to war. Men understood that.
2. BANKING:
"You needed your husband's signature!" Yes, because by LAW, a woman was LEGALLY PROTECTED from debt. Her husband was the head of household and by law HE was 100% liable for ALL debts she made. If she borrowed and couldn't pay, THEY CAME FOR HIM, not her. Creditors went to jail or lost everything - the husband.
So of course his signature was needed. He is the one who goes to prison if you don't pay.
3. PROPERTY - COVERTURE:
They cry about coverture. Coverture meant when you marry, your property merges under ONE name, the husband's, because there was ONE tax filing per household, not two like today. ONE household, ONE name, ONE tax.
It was not to steal from you. It was because the husband was legally responsible for you. If you got sued, he paid. If you owed taxes, he paid. He took your debts too.
These men had mothers they worshipped and daughters they would die for. They were not oppressing women, they were covering them.
4. CONTROLLING WOMEN'S BODIES:
The biggest lie. Back then there were NO abortion pills, NO condoms that worked, NO diapers, NO formula, NO government money to raise a child alone as a single mother, NO good jobs for women to survive alone.
Who bears the most risk in unprotected sex? THE WOMAN. She gets pregnant for 9 months, she risks death during childbirth, which was very common then.
So what did society do? They made sure women stayed virgins until marriage, and made sure men MARRIED them before sex. That is not oppression, that is PROTECTION from becoming a single mother with 3 kids and no food.
And it WORKED. Single motherhood rate was less than 5%. Marriage rate was 90%. Children grew up with fathers.
Today you have "freedom" - 40% single mothers, fatherless homes, abortions everywhere, and women crying that men don't want them.
There was never oppression. There was a system that understood biology and protected women from the consequences of their own choices.