Joe

This canNOT be a coincidence

I'm glad there are zero But the thing is, without actual creation & enforcement of common sense rules based on biological reality, anything goes That's what we saw before the grown-ups in the room stood up against that utter insanity You were not one of those grown-ups, Pablo

Jay-Z watching his own halftime show

The stroke was pure - out of the way ref!!

Hard to lose when up 28-3 but DQ figured that out too Time to face that that's what he does and that year 1 was a combination of good injury luck, favorable schedule, free agency patches, Kingsbury, and Jayden playing great obviously Now all we have is Jayden.. maybe a defense that's not horrible. I'm fine with moving on from Peters too 🤷

If marijuana is the gateway drug, alcohol is the crossover drug.

He took a stance. His stance is that musicians are on no position to lecture their audience about certain things Sounds like you disagree because evidently your stance is that everyone should voice their opinion on everything But I'm guessing that this belief is... conditional

“Believes” is not the right word here. Nor is “pain.” The key word here is “something,” mainly the THING part. But I actually think it’s good not to be “mean” to AI because it’s a sign of solid mental health. I’ve found myself terribly frustrated with AI. I'd be like, “DO THE EFFING THING!” Then I realize that not only am I pissed at a machine, I’m pissed that the machine can’t do something I would never have dreamed of asking a machine to do just a few months ago.

When someone asks if ai is conscious the appropriate response is are you retarded

I haven't watched any college football this year Just turned on the end of Wisconsin-Penn State game and holy hell is it fucking bad Terrible coaching, decision making, playing. And the announcers couldn't be more clueless Just a completely unwatchable disaster of a product

Hey guys fuck billionaires and data centers and remember climate change and free Palestine and oh hey check out my ginormous udders

Bears fans are fags

Is it possible this guy just had too much Adderall that day?

Guys, how's our voter growth strategy going? Rapes are up 13% Perfect!

Both sides report false news. But only The Left aims to shut down all dissent. Their framing of everything being racist or fascist or islamophobic or transphobic or homophobic is their attempt to silence anyone who disagrees (which of course looks much more like actual fascism). A false report can be debunked with evidence and facts. Saying "that's racist" when it clearly isn't not only distorts facts, but serves to shut down entirely any attempt at good faith engagement. And when The Right disagrees and establishes sound reasoning for their opinions, they get shot like Charlie Kirk. I understand the slippery slope but the majority of legacy media has been nothing more than The Left's mouthpiece since forever. They are not The Press. They are propagandists. [I will say that The Right does something similar with the antisemite label when it comes to questioning our relationship with Israel. But I do see many outlets and members of the GOP denouncing that whereas Dems seems perfectly content to believe half the country is xxxxxx-ist] From Grok: Left-leaning outlets and commentators have repeatedly treated certain policy or empirical claims as presumptively racist. Common examples include: “All Lives Matter” as a response to Black Lives Matter. Multiple outlets and commentators described the phrase itself as racist or a dog whistle, even when used as a statement of equal value. Opposition to race-conscious policies such as affirmative action, DEI hiring quotas, or race-specific COVID guidance. Critics who argued these treat people as members of racial groups rather than individuals were frequently labeled racist rather than answered on the merits of color-blind vs. race-conscious approaches. Discussion of group differences in crime rates, family structure, or test scores. Presenting FBI, BJS, or NAEP data that show disparities has often been treated as evidence of the speaker’s racism rather than an invitation to examine causes (culture, family, policing, economics, etc.). Immigration enforcement and asylum limits. Restrictions or “remain in Mexico”-style policies were routinely framed as racist even when the stated rationale was fiscal cost, rule of law, or security. Senator Tim Scott’s 2021 rebuttal arguing that America is not systemically racist. Coverage and social-media reaction from left-leaning media included racial slurs and character attacks rather than engagement with his distinction between individual racism and systemic claims. Biological sex in sports, prisons, and shelters. Statements that male-bodied athletes have physical advantages or that sex is binary for certain policy purposes have been called transphobic or bigoted, often without addressing the underlying data on strength, injury rates, or fairness. These patterns appear in coverage from CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Guardian, and similar outlets, especially during 2015–2022. The same outlets have also applied the label to statements by Trump, various Republicans, and sometimes fellow Democrats (e.g., Kamala Harris’s 2019 debate attack on Biden over busing and working with segregationist senators). The tactic works because “racist” carries high social cost. Once applied, the original argument is often treated as illegitimate rather than tested. Overuse has the predictable effect of making the term less precise; that observation itself is now common across the political spectrum. Genuine racial animus exists and should be identified with evidence. Treating every disagreement about policy, data, or trade-offs as bigotry does the opposite

Question: can someone really be this stupid? Answer: 👇