Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
The real retard right were the people who told you the war wouldn't matter
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
Me & my boy hate violence so much we are officially condemning Porter Rockwell. “Destroying Angel”? Cringe Bro, do the emotional chungus labor like we do
I was embarrassed for the Church History Matters folks tripping over themselves to dunk on Porter Rockwell.
What’s @adam_ebberts say about being critical of those in our past who built the society we now enjoy (and from where we comfortably throw stones)?
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
The Book of Mormon actually anticipates & integrates Nietzsche's psychological critique of Christianity (which we would say is basically accurate)
Also we already baptized him & Evola & Spengler so, checkmate
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
«This royal path has long been trod
By righteous men, each now a God:
As Abra’m, Isaac, Jacob, too,
First babes, then men, to gods they grew.
As man now is, our God once was;
As now God is, so man may be,
Which doth unfold man’s destiny.»
— Lorenzo Snow
I challenge every Mormon on X to REPOST 🔁 this quote from your own church’s 5th president. Let’s see how many of you are willing to publicly stand behind it.
“As man now is, God once was: As God now is, man may be.”
— Lorenzo Snow, 5th President of the LDS Church
#LatterDaySaints #LDS #ChurchOfJesusChrist #ComeUntoChrist #HearHim #BookOfMormon #BecauseOfHim #RestoredGospel #LDSChurch #MormonFaith
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
“AND THERE IS NONE OTHER NATION ON EARTH THAT WOULD CRUCIFY THEIR GOD”
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
Jesus does not reject or call the Mosaic penalty for adultery unjust.
In John 8 the scribes and Pharisees cite the law requiring that such a woman be stoned. He does not dispute the command and he instead requires that the sinless witness cast the first stone (consistent with the rule that the witnesses begin the execution), the accusers leave, and he tells her to go and sin no more.
In Matthew 23 he also tells the crowd and his disciples that the scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat, so they should observe whatever those leaders teach from the law, while not imitating their hypocrisy.
Both passages treat the civil statutes in the Law of Moses as given and authoritative in their setting
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
modern prophets have consistently taught that Jehovah gave the Law of Moses, including its civil penalties. Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, and later Church leaders affirmed the biblical account that God commanded these statutes for ancient Israel
The fact that the higher law superseded them does not mean the earlier commands were never given
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
The Curse of Ham
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
Except there is a literal letter which exists inviting Randolph Jefferson to Monticello just over 9 months prior to the birth of Eston Hemmings, the only child shown to have a Jefferson Y chromosome, with Randolph and possibly his own sons coming along on said trip, Randolph known for partying with slaves all night and known to have fathered children with them. Randolph was present at Monticello during the conception window.
The attacks against Jefferson on this existed at his own time, claiming that she was a black venus, in reality, Sally was 3/4 White, said to be mighty near white with long straight hair as the only description we have of her contemporary to her life.
Further, the child that was contemporary to these claims named Tom had his descendants tested, and there was no Jefferson Y chromosome. So they decided therefore that he must not have been a child of Sally at all, simply to continue this position.
The entire thing is used to obfuscate his whole legacy and turn Monticello into the Sally Hemmings house. It's pure nonsense and this "new genome" is literally just more of the same, ignoring all historical evidence, and done so to try and push the claim that blacks somehow built America.
The book you're pushing is still under review with anything scientific. They're running this just to reinforce their political narratives, which is what all of this serves and what it is driven by, not by anything remotely valuable but simply to push progressive politics.
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
Dude basically saying Christ can’t be married because he’s already gay married
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
> be
> me die
> enter spirit world
> good enough for paradise
> spirit prison next door
> playing sin.mp4 for ∞ hrs
> they hide from god like that works
> wait in paradise for salvation dad to return with milk
> sometimes go nextdoor to teach about milk
> salvation dad returns with milk
> mfw Christ looking directly at me
> loading celestialglory.exe
> big bro reigns for 1k yrs
> gay satan in timeout for 1k yrs
> satan gets parole
> final war
> dad
> erm i mean adam
> erm i mean michael gives a celestial spanking
> satan flipping dies
> satan has fallen, krillions must party
> prisoners missed the action
> telestial fomo.exe
> they try to get honeymoon dlc
> declined
> insufficient funds
> missing hardware
> no foid
> fuh
> sorting hat time
> celestial: fathers house
> terrestrial: sons house
> telestial: holy spirits liminal space
> sealed couples become like father
> loading eternalhoneymoon.exe
> retards argue with god
> portray themselves as chad
> they wake up in outer darkness
> literal hell
> od in od
> files deleted
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
Jesus Was Married by Ogden Kraut
I'm about halfway through and I'm already convinced
youtu.be/BlrXd9OprDM?si=wd1n…
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
have to start arresting judges
His parents told KETV that the 3-year-old boy is their little cowboy and will survive his injuries. Here's the latest: ketv.com/article/omaha-walma…
Latter-day Monarchist retweeted
The Savior's parable of "leaving the ninety-&-nine" is often used in these contexts, to indicate that the exceptions & outliers must receive special attention, because they alone are at risk
The Lord does not frame his parable as morally revolutionary, but as common sense, universal husbandry practice: "what man of you, having an hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine?"
Leaving the ninety-&-nine is not something a theoretically Maximally Morally Good shepherd *should* do
It's something any of you *would* do - it would be ridiculous not to do it
The parable is advice for metaphorical shepherds - it has to be actual good advice: so what is going to happen if you leave the 99?
Are they that much smarter & better-behaved than the one lost sheep - or are they basically all just sheep? Are five more going to wander off a cliff, or get messily devoured by wolves, while you're hunting down the one?
Because the Lord is speaking of pedestrian things well-understood to his audience, he does not include the obvious fact that shepherds carefully maintain *sheepfolds*
They maintain fences, they guard the sheep communally so there is continual supervision, & (as Jesus notes in other parables) the Good Shepherd is "the door of the sheep", placing his body at the threshold, against predators & thieves
The Parable of the One Lost Sheep is spiritually incoherent unless you take for granted that the ninety-&-nine are actually being cared for - that the Lord's shepherds are carefully maintaining the standards & boundaries from which the One has strayed
The message of the Parable is not to permanently abandon the 99 in favor of the One - it is to energetically bring the One back within the boundaries you have set, within which the 99 are already secure
“I grew up in Arizona, served a mission in Mexico, and went to college thinking I had a pretty clear path for my life. Then I met my now wife Victoria, and everything changed in the best way.
“She always knew she wanted to be a doctor. Pediatric neurology isn’t an easy road, but it’s who she is, compassionate, steady, brilliant, and drawn to help kids and families through the hardest things life hands them. When she got into med school in California, we packed up and moved.
“Stepping into her dream together was an easy choice. I wanted to support her the way she has always supported me. And honestly, watching her work and sacrifice and love people like she does has strengthened my faith more than anything else.
“My path hasn’t been as clear. I’ve tried different directions, learned a lot, prayed a lot. Some days I still feel like I’m figuring it out. But I do know that God doesn’t measure timelines. He measures love, humility, and the way we show up for each other.
“Supporting her doesn’t shrink my purpose—it expands it. Our callings from God can look different, and that’s beautiful. I’m building my future too, but I’m grateful that right now, part of my purpose is cheering for the person I love most as she steps into hers.
“There’s not one 'right way' to build a family or a future. For us, this is ours. And it’s sacred.” — Nate
