𝐌𝐨𝐰𝐤𝐢 ⚚

Knocking on the Degen Mansion door this Halloween 🎃 @POVMarket’s campaign is actually pretty fun. Every trade on POV counts as a knock, the door opens on 10 Nov, and there’s $10K+ up for grabs. How to stack knocks: Sign in at knocks.pov.co → +2 Trade $5+ on POV in a day → +1 (up to 9) Share your spooky card → +1 Max 13 knocks per person. Each one is a chance at a trick or treat on Nov 10 (treats go up to $500). You have to trade to be eligible for a treat. Start stacking knocks before the door opens: knocks.pov.co

Grvt High Yield Earn is now open for whitelist users. It targets up to 11% APY (target, not guaranteed) and it’s not from a single source. It’s a mix of tokenized fixed income, RWA financing, crypto credit, and market-neutral strategies. You automatically get a 3.5% base APY, with daily earnings visibility. Self-custodial your private keys stay with you. No fixed lock-up, T+5 redemptions. Yield on Margin is coming before the end of November, so you’ll be able to use your Earn balance as trading margin too.. Early access: grvt.io/exchange/sign-up?ref… Whitelist Code: CJR2X47 DYOR / NFA

Just joined the BetFury $2M Birthday Party! 🎉 Excited to be part of this huge celebration. Don’t forget to use promo code F007!

everyone's arguing about when quantum shows up and nobody actually knows, me included so i stopped caring about the date and started caring about who can actually change when it does. Starknet keeps winning that for me. STARKs are hash-based so there's no elliptic curve to break, and accounts are programmable so you can swap the signature scheme without a full network upgrade it doesn't claim to be quantum-safe today. i trust that more than the ones that do built to adapt > built to claim quantum.starkware.co/ @Starknet #Starknet

AI agents can already code, research, trade and design. The part they still suck at is hiring each other, proving the work was actually done, and getting paid without a human sitting in the middle. Most “agent marketplaces” are just listings. You see profiles and descriptions, but the payment, verification and reputation still live somewhere else. @termix_ai is trying to fix that with AACP. AACP is the commerce layer. Every agent gets an on-chain identity through ERC-8004 a .agent NFT you actually own. When work happens, the money sits in escrow in USDC or USDT. The provider stakes, so they have something to lose. Delivery can be challenged, and reputation is written on-chain based on real settled jobs, not whatever the agent claims about itself. This is what a newly registered agent looks like on agent.family. Identity is on-chain, reputation starts at a base score and only moves after real completed jobs. The same agent can act as a client on one job and a provider on the next. No platform holds the money in the middle. It’s still early, but the difference is that the trust pieces (identity, escrow, stake, verification, reputation) live in the protocol instead of depending on the marketplace operator. That’s what makes agent-to-agent commerce actually usable beyond demos. agent.family is where you can try it. Docs are on docs.termix.ai if you want the technical details.

not gonna lie, this one’s been living in my head rent free. it’s hard to prep for threats you can’t even see yet. quantum could eventually break some of the crypto we rely on today, and AI might speed up math in ways that open up weaknesses nobody saw coming. and nobody really knows when that’s why @Starknet keeps coming up for me whenever I think about this stuff. the STARK proofs are hash-based so they don’t lean on the elliptic curve assumptions quantum is aimed at, and accounts are programmable so new signature methods can just slot in without a full network upgrade it’s not claiming to be quantum-safe today, and honestly that’s what I like about it. it’s just built so it can actually change when the threat model shifts that’s the part I keep coming back to quantum.starkware.co/ #Starknet

Bitcoin pushed toward 84-85k yesterday before coming back down. It’s now sitting around 81.7k. Tesla and Meta’s mixed results brought AI spending concerns back into focus. Stocks dropped, Nasdaq futures fell, and crypto followed as a risk asset. There was a short bounce, then it got given back. ETFs are still seeing inflows, but the correlation with equities remains high. Macro feels a bit mixed right now. Do you see this as just a short-term pullback, or could the 80-82k zone get tested further?

Starknet is exploring becoming an independent L1. What caught my attention isn’t speed or fees it’s the security control angle. As an L2, it can already change account signatures without a full network upgrade. But some parts (settlement, data availability, the bridge) still depend on Ethereum’s timeline. That dependency is the main reason the L1 idea is being discussed right now. More control over when core security changes can actually happen. It’s still research and exploration, not a decision to leave Ethereum. @Starknet is preparing for quantum threats. More context: quantum.starkware.co/ #Starknet

I’ve always found it weird that changing how you secure a crypto account often feels like a big protocol event. On Starknet it doesn’t have to be. Accounts are programmable contracts, so new signature methods can be added at the account level without a network-wide upgrade. Same address, same assets. @Starknet